assignment of debt by debtor

Assignment Of Debt: Definition & Sample

Jump to section, what is an assignment of debt.

Assignment of debt is an agreement that transfer debt, rights, and obligations from a creditor to a third party. Assignment of debt agreements are commonly found when a creditor issues past due debt to a debt collection agency. The original lender will be relieved of all obligations and the agency will become the new owner of the debt. Debt assignment allows creditors to improve liquidity by reducing their financial risk. If a creditor has taken on a large amount of unsecured debt, an assignment of debt agreement is a quick way to transfer some of the unsecured loans to another party.

Common Sections in Assignments Of Debt

Below is a list of common sections included in Assignments Of Debt. These sections are linked to the below sample agreement for you to explore.

Assignment Of Debt Sample

Reference : Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-10 19 ex107.htm ASSIGNMENT OF DEBT AND SECURITY , Viewed October 25, 2021, View Source on SEC .

Who Helps With Assignments Of Debt?

Lawyers with backgrounds working on assignments of debt work with clients to help. Do you need help with an assignment of debt?

Post a project  in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate assignments of debt. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.

ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.

Meet some of our Assignment Of Debt Lawyers

International-savvy technology lawyer with 35years+ in Silicon Valley, Tokyo, Research Triangle, Silicon Forest. Outside & inside general counsel, legal infrastructure development, product exports, and domestic & international contracts for clients across North America, Europe, and Asia. Work with Founders to establish startup and continuous revenue, sourcing and partnering with investors to attract funding, define success strategy and direct high-performing teams, advising stakeholders and Boards of Directors to steer company growth.

David Alexander advises clients on complex real estate transactions, including the acquisition, disposition, construction, financing and leasing of shopping centers, office buildings and industrial buildings throughout the U.S. An experienced real estate attorney, David reviews, drafts and negotiates all manner of retail, office and industrial real estate agreements, including purchase and sale agreements, construction contracts, leases and financing documentation.

Managing partner at Patel & Almeida and has over 22 years of experience assisting clients in the areas of intellectual property. business, employment, and nonprofit law.

Tiffanie W.

Tiffanie Wilson is a business transactions and personal injury lawyer. She helps clients realize their business goals by expertly drafting contracts, providing sound legal advice, and working for justice for injured clients.

An experienced attorney with a varied range of legal abilities. Focusing on real estate transactions and general commercial litigation.

Doug has over 20 years of private and public company general counsel experience focusing his legal practice on commercial transactions including both software and biotech. He is a tech savvy, business savvy lawyer who is responsive and will attain relationship building outcomes with your counterparty while effectively managing key risks and accelerating revenue. He received his Juris Doctor from Boston University School of Law earning the Book Award in Professional Ethics and after graduation he taught legal writing there for a number of years. Prior to law school, Doug earned a M.A in Mathematics at the State University of New York at Stony Brook, and a B.S in Honors Mathematics at Purdue University. After law school, Doug joined Fish & Richardson, where his practice focused on licensing software, trademarks and biotech. While at Fish & Richardson Doug authored a book on software licensing published by the American Intellectual Property Lawyers Association. Later he joined as General Counsel at FTP Software and led an IPO as well as corporate development. Doug has broad experience with a broad range of commercial agreement drafting and negotiation including SaaS software and professional services, distribution and other channel agreements, joint venture and M&A. Doug continued his leadership, corporate governance and commercial transaction practice at Mercury Computers (NASDAQ:MRCY) leading corporate development. Doug’s experience ranges from enterprise software to biotech and other vertical markets. He joined the board of Deque Systems in 2009 and joined in an operating role as President in 2020 successfully scaling the software business.

I graduated from Georgetown Law in 2009 and have been practicing for fourteen years. I primarily work on commercial contracts. I specialize in drafting, reviewing, and negotiating MSAs for services companies, specializing in SaaS agreements. I have drafted online terms of service, acceptance use policies, and privacy policies for clients across a range of industries. In addition, I counsel clients on NDAs, non-solicitation/non-competition agreements, employment contracts, and commercial and residential leases. Prior to opening my own practice, I worked for four years at one of the most prestigious law firms in the world, an appellate litigation firm, the federal government, and one of the country's most renowned government contracts firms. I live in Boulder but represent clients nationwide. Although I have represented numerous Fortune 500 companies and the Defense Department, my passion is advising startups and small businesses. Like so many of my clients, I am an entrepreneur and have owned and operated three businesses (my law firm and two companies outside the legal field). I understand the needs and concerns of small business owners. I look forward to working with you.

Find the best lawyer for your project

Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.

How It Works

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer

Financial lawyers by top cities

• Austin Financial Lawyers
• Boston Financial Lawyers
• Chicago Financial Lawyers
• Dallas Financial Lawyers
• Denver Financial Lawyers
• Houston Financial Lawyers
• Los Angeles Financial Lawyers
• New York Financial Lawyers
• Phoenix Financial Lawyers
• San Diego Financial Lawyers
• Tampa Financial Lawyers

Assignment Of Debt lawyers by city

• Austin Assignment Of Debt Lawyers
• Boston Assignment Of Debt Lawyers
• Chicago Assignment Of Debt Lawyers
• Dallas Assignment Of Debt Lawyers
• Denver Assignment Of Debt Lawyers
• Houston Assignment Of Debt Lawyers
• Los Angeles Assignment Of Debt Lawyers
• New York Assignment Of Debt Lawyers
• Phoenix Assignment Of Debt Lawyers
• San Diego Assignment Of Debt Lawyers
• Tampa Assignment Of Debt Lawyers

Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.

I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.

I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Find lawyers and attorneys by city

• Insights & events

Assigning debts and other contractual claims - not as easy as first thought

Harking back to law school, we had a thirst for new black letter law. Section 136 of the Law of the Property Act 1925 kindly obliged. This lays down the conditions which need to be satisfied for an effective legal assignment of a chose in action (such as a debt). We won’t bore you with the detail, but suffice to say that what’s important is that a legal assignment must be in writing and signed by the assignor, must be absolute (i.e. no conditions attached) and crucially that written notice of the assignment must be given to the debtor.

When assigning debts, it’s worth remembering that you can’t legally assign part of a debt – any attempt to do so will take effect as an equitable assignment. The main practical difference between a legal and an equitable assignment is that the assignor will need to be joined in any legal proceedings in relation to the assigned debt (e.g. an attempt to recover that part of the debt).

Recent cases which tell another story

Why bother telling you the above?  Aside from our delight in remembering the joys of debating the merits of legal and equitable assignments (ehem), it’s worth revisiting our textbooks in the context of three recent cases. Although at first blush the statutory conditions for a legal assignment seem quite straightforward, attempts to assign contractual claims such as debts continue to throw up legal disputes:

• In  Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp Europe Ltd v Euler Hermes Europe SA (NV) [2019] EWHC 2250 (Comm),  the High Court held that a performance bond issued under a construction contract was not effectively assigned despite the surety acknowledging a notice of assignment of the bond. Sadly, the notice of assignment failed to meet the requirements under the bond instrument that the assignee confirm its acceptance of a provision in the bond that required the employer to repay the surety in the event of an overpayment. This case highlights the importance of ensuring any purported assignment meets any conditions stipulated in the underlying documents.
• In  Promontoria (Henrico) Ltd v Melton [2019] EWHC 2243 (Ch) (26 June 2019) , the High Court held that an assignment of a facility agreement and legal charges was valid, even though the debt assigned had to be identified by considering external evidence. The deed of assignment in question listed the assets subject to assignment, but was illegible to the extent that the debtor’s name could not be deciphered. The court got comfortable that there had been an effective assignment, given the following factors: (i) the lender had notified the borrower of its intention to assign the loan to the assignee; (ii) following the assignment, the lender had made no demand for repayment; (iii) a manager of the assignee had given a statement that the loan had been assigned and the borrower had accepted in evidence that he was aware of the assignment. Fortunately for the assignee, a second notice of assignment - which was invalid because it contained an incorrect date of assignment - did not invalidate the earlier assignment, which was found to be effective. The court took a practical and commercial view of the circumstances, although we recommend ensuring that your assignment documents clearly reflect what the parties intend!
• Finally, in Nicoll v Promontoria (Ram 2) Ltd [2019] EWHC 2410 (Ch),  the High Court held that a notice of assignment of a debt given to a debtor was valid, even though the effective date of assignment stated in the notice could not be verified by the debtor. The case concerned a debt assigned by the Co-op Bank to Promontoria and a joint notice given by assignor and assignee to the debtor that the debt had been assigned “on and with effect from 29 July 2016”. A subsequent statutory demand served by Promontoria on the debtor for the outstanding sums was disputed on the basis that the notice of assignment was invalid because it contained an incorrect date of assignment. Whilst accepting that the documentation was incapable of verifying with certainty the date of assignment, the Court held that the joint notice clearly showed that both parties had agreed that an assignment had taken place and was valid. This decision suggests that mistakes as to the date of assignment in a notice of assignment may not necessarily be fatal, if it is otherwise clear that the debt has been assigned.

The conclusion from the above? Maybe it’s not quite as easy as first thought to get an assignment right. Make sure you follow all of the conditions for a legal assignment according to the underlying contract and ensure your assignment documentation is clear.

Contact our experts for further advice

Necessary cookies . These are cookies which are necessary for the operation of our website. We set these cookies so that they are always on.

Analytics and other third-party cookies . We would like to use analytics and limited other third-party cookies to improve our website and your experience using it. These cookies collect and report information to us about your browsing activity on our website. If you are happy to allow us to use these cookies, please click “all cookies” or you can turn individual cookies on by clicking "manage cookies". You can change your preferences at any time by visiting our cookie details page.

We use cookies on our website, details of which are set out below.

Necessary cookies

These are cookies which are necessary for the operation of our website. We set these cookies so that they are always on, although you may be able to disable these cookies via your browser if you wish. Please note that if these cookies are disabled then you may not be able to use some or all of the functionality of our website.

Ideally over time we would like to be able to improve our website and your experience using it. We would like to deploy analytics cookies to enable us to do this, which would collect and report information to us about your browsing activity on our website. However, we will only use these cookies with your consent and these cookies are switched off until you opt to turn them on. Click here for a full list of analytics cookies used on our website.

Third-party cookies are set by our partners and help us to improve your experience of the website. Click here for a full list of third-party plugins used on our website.

Search our site

Debt Assignment: Understanding the Mechanics, Risks, and Benefits with Real-world Examples

Last updated 03/19/2024 by

Fact checked by

What is debt assignment?

How debt assignments work, special considerations, criticism of debt assignment.

• Enhanced liquidity for creditors.
• Risk reduction by divesting high-risk loans.
• Quick injection of capital for urgent financial needs.
• Opportunity to free up resources from aging debts.
• Potential for unethical practices by debt collectors.
• Allegations of harassment and threats towards debtors.
• Risk of pursuing debts that have already been settled.

Frequently asked questions

Is debt assignment legal, can a debtor reject a debt assignment, how does debt assignment impact the debtor’s credit score, what recourse do debtors have if faced with unethical debt collection practices, key takeaways.

• Debt assignment involves the legal transfer of debt and associated rights to a third party.
• Notification to the debtor is crucial to prevent unintentional default and ensure proper payment channels.
• Third-party debt collectors operate under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).
• Creditors may assign debt to improve liquidity, reduce risk exposure, or deal with aging debts.
• Debt assignment has faced criticism for unethical practices by some debt buyers.

Show Article Sources

You might also like.

How does it work?

1. choose this template.

Start by clicking on "Fill out the template"

2. Complete the document

Answer a few questions and your document is created automatically.

3. Save - Print

Your document is ready! You will receive it in Word and PDF formats. You will be able to modify it.

Debt Assignment and Assumption Agreement

A Debt Assignment and Assumption Agreement is a very simple document whereby one party assigns their debt to another party, and the other party agrees to take that debt on. The party that is assigning the debt is the original debtor; they are called the assignor. The party that is assuming the debt is the new debtor; they are called the assignee.

The debt is owed to a creditor.

This document is different than a Debt Settlement Agreement , because there, the original debtor has paid back all of the debt and is now free and clear. Here, the debt still stands, but it will just be owed to the creditor by another party.

This is also different than a Debt Acknowledgment Form , because there, the original debtor is simply signing a document acknowledging their debt.

How to use this document

This document is extremely short and to-the-point. It contains just the identities of the parties, the terms of the debt, the debt amount, and the signatures. It is auto-populated with some important contract terms to make this a complete agreement.

When this document is filled out, it should be printed, signed by the assignor and the creditor, and then signed by the assignee in front of a notary. It is important to have the assignee's signature notarized, because that is the party that is taking on the debt.

Applicable law

Debt Assignment and Assumption Agreements are generally covered by the state law where the debt was originally incurred.

How to modify the template

You fill out a form. The document is created before your eyes as you respond to the questions.

At the end, you receive it in Word and PDF formats. You can modify it and reuse it.

Debt Assignment and Assumption Agreement - FREE

Country: United States

General Business Documents - Other downloadable templates of legal documents

• Amendment to Agreement
• Loan Agreement
• Loan Agreement Modification
• Release of Loan Agreement
• Non-Compete Agreement
• Partnership Dissolution Agreement
• Notice of Withdrawal from Partnership
• Power Of Attorney
• Debt Acknowledgment Form
• Meeting Minutes
• Request to Alter Contract
• Release Agreement
• Guaranty Agreement
• Joint Venture Agreement
• Contract Assignment Agreement
• Debt Settlement Agreement
• Breach of Contract Notice
• Corporate Proxy
• Mutual Rescission and Release Agreement
• Notice for Non-Renewal of Contract
• Other downloadable templates of legal documents

• How Does Debt Assignment Work?

Chloe Meltzer | December 07, 2023

Legal Expert Chloe Meltzer, MA

Chloe Meltzer is an experienced content writer specializing in legal content creation. She holds a degree in English Literature from Arizona State University, complemented by a Master’s in Marketing from California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo.

Edited by Hannah Locklear

Editor at SoloSuit Hannah Locklear, BA

Hannah Locklear is SoloSuit’s Marketing and Impact Manager. With an educational background in Linguistics, Spanish, and International Development from Brigham Young University, Hannah has also worked as a legal support specialist for several years.

Summary: What are your options when your debt has been assigned to a debt collector? Find out why a creditor might have assigned your debt and how to deal with it.

Debt assignment refers to a transfer of debt. This includes all of the associated rights and obligations, as it goes from a creditor to a third party. Debt assignment is essentially the legal transfer of debt to a debt collector (or debt collection agency). After this agency purchases the debt, they will have the responsibility to collect the debt, meaning you will pay your debt to them.

File a response with SoloSuit to win against debt collectors.

Find Out How Debt Assignment Works

When a creditor or lender no longer wants to be responsible for attempting to collect your debt, they will sell your debt to a third party. When this occurs, a Notice of Assignment (NOA) is sent out to you. This should inform you of who is responsible for collecting the rest of your loan or debt.

Legally you must be notified if your debt is assigned to someone new. This is to ensure that you know where to make payments to. If you are not aware of the new assignment, you may send payments to the wrong location which could force you into unintentional default.

Know How the FDCPA Protects You

Third-party debt collectors must act according to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). This federal law restricts the methods by which a debt collector can contact you, and attempt to collect debts. The FDCPA regulates the time of day or night a collector can make contact, how often they can call, as well as what they say and how they say it.

If you believe that a debt collector has violated the FDCPA, then you may be able to file a suit against that company. You may also be able to sue for damages or attorney fees.

Stand up to debt collection agencies with SoloSuit.

Learn Why a Creditor Assigns Debt

There are a few reasons why a creditor may assign your debt. Typically, the most common reason is to reduce their risk. By assigning and selling the debt it is no longer their liability. They can ensure they recoup some of their money, and appease investors as well.

Discover How Purchasing a Debt Differs from Debt Assignment

The purchase of debt occurs before assignment. Before the assignment of delinquent debt, a collection agency will be required to purchase it. This is often done at a far lower price, while they still attempt to recoup the entire debt. Because of this, it allows you to attempt to settle your debt for less.

Understand Why Debt Assignment Is Often Criticized

The process of assigning debt is often seen as unethical. With threats, harassment, and lies of all kinds, many debt buyers have been accused of violating the FDCPA. Because of this, debt assignment has seen a good amount of criticism. Some cases have even seen consumers charged with debts that have already been settled or paid .

Nevertheless, this shows how important it is to be on top of your debts. The number one choice you should make with any debt or debt assignment is to respond to all correspondence. This will ensure that you stay in compliance, and act when you need to.

What is SoloSuit?

SoloSuit makes it easy to respond to a debt collection lawsuit.

How it works: SoloSuit is a step-by-step web-app that asks you all the necessary questions to complete your answer. Upon completion, you can either print the completed forms and mail in the hard copies to the courts or you can pay SoloSuit to file it for you and to have an attorney review the document.

Respond with SoloSuit

"First time getting sued by a debt collector and I was searching all over YouTube and ran across SoloSuit, so I decided to buy their services with their attorney reviewed documentation which cost extra but it was well worth it! SoloSuit sent the documentation to the parties and to the court which saved me time from having to go to court and in a few weeks the case got dismissed!" – James

>>Read the FastCompany article: Debt Lawsuits Are Complicated: This Website Makes Them Simpler To Navigate

>>Read the NPR story on SoloSuit: A Student Solution To Give Utah Debtors A Fighting Chance

How to Answer a Summons for debt collection in all 50 states

Here's a list of guides on how to respond to a debt collection lawsuit in each state:

The Ultimate 50 State Guide

• Connecticut
• Massachusetts
• Mississippi
• New Hampshire
• North Carolina
• North Dakota
• Pennsylvania
• Rhode Island
• South Carolina
• South Dakota
• Vermont ; Vermont (Small Claims court)
• West Virginia

Guides on how to resolve debt with every debt collector

Are you being sued by a debt collector? We’re making guides on how to resolve debt with each one.

• 11 Charter Communications
• AAA Collections
• Aargon Agency Inc
• Absolute Resolutions Investments LLC
• ACEI Collections
• Account Services
• Accredited Collection Services
• Advanced Recovery Systems
• AFNI Collections
• Alco Capital Group LLC
• Aldous and Associates
• Alliance Collections
• Alliance One
• Alliant Capital Management
• Alpha Recovery Corp
• Alltran Financial
• Alltran Health
• Alorica Inc.
• Amcol Clmbia in Court
• American Coradius International
• American Profit Recovery
• American Recovery Service
• Americollect
• AmSher Collection Services
• Apelles LLC
• AR Resources
• ARC Collections
• ARM Solutions
• Arrow Financial Services
• ARS National Services
• ARSC Debt Collectors
• AscensionPoint Recovery Services
• Asset Acceptance LLC
• Asset Recovery Solutions
• Associated Credit Services
• Atlantic Credit and Finance
• Atradius Collections
• Automated Collection Services, Inc.
• Autovest LLC
• AWA Collections
• Balekian Hayes
• Bay Area Receivables
• BCA Financial Services
• BC Services
• Benuck and Rainey
• Berlin-Wheeler
• Bluebonnet Financial LLC
• Bonneville Collections
• Bull City Financial
• Bureaus Investment Group
• Caine and Weiner
• Capio Partners
• Capital Accounts
• Capital Collections
• Capital Management Services
• Carmel Financial/New Coast Direct
• Cavalry SPV I LLC
• CBCS Collections
• CBV Collections
• CCB Credit Services
• CCS Collections
• CCS Offices
• Central Mediation Services
• Central Portfolio Control
• Cerastes LLC
• Choice Recovery
• Choice Recovery Inc
• CKS Financial
• CKMS Financial
• Client Services
• CMRE Financial Services
• Coast Professional
• Comenity Bank Debt Collection
• Commonwealth Financial
• ConServe Debt Collection
• Consumer Collection Management
• Contract Callers Inc
• Convergent Healthcare Recoveries
• Convergent Outsourcing
• Couch Conville & Blitt
• Covington Credit
• Credco in Court
• Credence Resource Management
• Credit Bureau Systems
• Credit Control Corporation
• Credit Management Company
• Credit Management LP
• Credit Systems
• CTC Debt Collector
• CVCS Debt Collection
• Cypress Financial Recoveries
• D&A Services
• Daniels, Norelli, Cecere & Tavel P.C.
• DCM Services
• Debt Recovery Solutions
• Delanor Kemper & Associates
• Department Stores National Bank
• Direct Recovery Associates
• Discover Collections
• Diversified Adjustment
• Diversified Consultants
• Diversified Recovery Bureau
• DNF Associates, LLC
• Dynamic Collectors
• Eagle Accounts Group, Inc.
• Eastern Account System
• Ellington and Associates Collections
• Encore Capital Group
• Enerson Law
• Enerson Law LLC
• Enhanced Recovery Company
• ERC Collections
• ERSolutions
• Estate Information Services
• Equable Ascent Financial
• Everest Business Funding
• Executive Credit Management
• Faber and Brand
• Factual Data
• Falls Collection Service
• FCO Collections and Outsourcing
• FIA Card Services
• fin rec svc (Financial Recovery Services)
• First Federal Credit Credit Control
• First Financial Bank
• First Portfolio Ventures LLC
• First Progress
• FirstPoint Collection Resources
• Firstsource Advantage
• FMA Alliance
• Forster & Garbus
• Franklin Collection Services
• Freedom Plus
• Freshview Solutions
• Frontline Asset
• Frost Arnett
• Fulton Friedman & Gullace LLP
• Galaxy International Purchasing, LLC
• GC Debt Collection
• GC Services
• General Revenue Corporation
• GLA Collections
• Glass Mountain Capital
• Glasser and Glasser
• Global Credit Collection Corp
• Global Trust Management
• GMAC Financing
• Golden 1 Credit Union
• Grant and Weber
• Grant Mercantile Agency
• Gulf Coast Collection Bureau
• Halsted Financial Services
• Harris and Harris
• Harvard Collection
• Harvest Credit Management
• Helvey and Associates
• Hollis Cobb
• Holloway Moxley
• Hosto Buchan
• Howard Lee Schiff
• H&R Accounts
• Hudson & Keyse LLC?
• Hunter Warfield
• Impact Receivables Management
• Innovative Recovery
• Integras Capital Recovery LLC
• Javitch Block
• JHPDE Finance 1 LLC
• JP Receivables Management Partners
• Kenneth Eisen and Associates
• KeyBank student loans
• Kirschenbaum, Phillips & Levy P.C.
• KLS Financial Services
• Kramer & Frank
• Lakeside Collection
• Lending Club
• Lincoln and Morgan Kabbage
• Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson LLP
• Lockhart Collection Agency
• LJ Ross Associates
• LTD Collections
• Malcolm S. Gerald and Associates
• Malen & Associates
• Mandarich Law Group
• Mannbracken
• Marcam Associates
• MARS Inc. Collections
• MCA Management Company
• McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff
• Meade & Associates
• Mercantile Adjustment Bureau
• Merchants Credit Association
• MGM Collections
• Michael J Adams PC
• Midland Funding LLC
• Mid-South Adjustment
• Monarch Recovery
• Monterey Financial
• Moss Law Firm
• Mountain Land Collections
• MRS Associates
• MSW Capital LLC
• Mullooly, Jeffrey, Rooney & Flynn
• Nathan and Nathan PC
• National Collegiate Trust
• National Credit Adjusters
• National Credit Care
• National Credit Systems
• National Enterprise Systems
• National Recovery Agency
• National Recovery Solutions
• Nationwide Credit
• Nationwide Recovery Services
• Nationwide Recovery Systems
• NCO Financial Systems Incorporated
• North American Recovery
• Northland Group
• Northstar Capital Acquisition
• Northstar Location Services
• NRC Collection Agency
• Oliver Adjustment Company
• Oliphant Financial, LLC
• P&B Capital Group
• PCB Collections Agency
• Palisades Collection LLC
• Pallida LLC
• Paragon Contracting Services
• Paragon Revenue Group
• Payday Loan Debt Collectors
• Pendrick Capital Partners
• Penn Credit
• Perdue Brandon
• Persolve LLC
• Phillips & Cohen Associates
• Phoenix Financial Services
• Pioneer Credit Recovery
• PRA Group, Inc.
• Pressler, Felt & Warshaw LLP
• Prestige Services, Inc.
• Prince Parker and Associates
• Professional Finance Company
• Progressive Management Systems
• Provest Law
• Quaternary Collection Agency
• RAB Collection Agency
• Rash Curtis and Associates
• Radius Global SOL
• Radius Global Solutions
• Rawlings Company
• Razor Capital
• Real Time Resolutions
• Receivables Performance Management
• Regents and Associates
• Reliant Capital Solutions
• Resurgent Capital Services and LVNV Funding
• Revco Solutions
• Revenue Enterprises LLC
• Revenue Group
• RGS Financial, Inc.
• RMP LLC in Court
• RMP Services
• RS Clark and Associates
• RTR Financial Services
• Rubin & Rothman
• Salander Enterprises LLC
• Samara Portfolio Management
• SCA Collections
• Scott Parnell and Associates
• Second Round Collections
• Second Round Sub LLC
• Selip & Stylianou LLP
• Sequium Asset Solutions
• Sessoms and Rogers
• Sherman Acquisition
• Sherman Financial Group
• SIMM Associates
• Source Receivables Management
• Southern Management Systems
• Southwest Credit Group
• Spire Recovery Solutions
• SRS Company
• Stark Collection Agency
• State Collection Service
• Stenger and Stenger
• Stillman Law Office
• Summit Account Resolution
• Sunrise Credit Services
• Superlative RM Debt Collector
• Suttell and Hammer
• Synergetic Communication
• Synerprise Consulting
• The Law Office of Michael J Scott
• Trellis Company
• Troy Capital
• TRS Recovery Services
• Tulsa Teachers Credit Union
• UCB Collection
• Unifin Debt Collector
• Universal Credit Services
• US Bank Collections
• USAA collections
• USCB America
• Valentine and Kebartas
• Valley Servicing
• Vance & Huffman LLC
• Van Ru Credit Corporation
• Velo Law Office
• Velocity Investments
• Viking Client Services
• Wakefield and Associates
• Waypoint Resource Group
• Weinberg and Associates
• Weltman, Weinberg & Reis
• Westwood Funding
• Williams and Fudge
• Wilshire Consumer Credit
• Wolpoff & Abramson
• Worldwide Asset Purchasing
• www.AutomotiveCredit.com
• Zarzaur & Schwartz
• Zwicker & Associates

Resolve your debt with your creditor

Some creditors, banks, and lenders have an internal collections department. If they come after you for a debt, Solosuit can still help you respond and resolve the debt. Here’s a list of guides on how to resolve debt with different creditors.

• American Express ; American Express – Debt Collection
• Bank of America
• Best Buy Credit Card
• Capital One
• Credit One Bank
• Old Navy Credit Card
• PayPal Synchrony Card
• Regional Finance
• Retailers National Bank
• Reunion Student Loan Finance Corporation
• SYNCB/PPEXTR
• Synchrony Bank
• Synchrony Walmart Card
• Target National Bank
• Wells Fargo
• Can I Pay My Original Creditor Instead of a Debt Collection Agency?
• Can I Settle a Debt with the Original Creditor?

Settle your medical debt

Having a health challenge is stressful, but dealing medical debt on top of it is overwhelming. Here are some resources on how to manage medical debt.

• Am I Responsible for My Spouse's Medical Debt?
• Do I Need a Lawyer for Medical Bills?
• Do I Need a Lawyer to Fight Medical Bill Debt?
• Does Bankruptcy Clear Medical Debt?
• How Much Do Collection Agencies Pay for Medical Debt?
• How to Find Medical Debt Forgiveness Programs
• Is There a Statute of Limitations on Medical Bills?
• Medical Debt Statute of Limitations by State
• Summoned to Court for Medical Bills — What Do I Do?
• Summoned to Court for Medical Bills? What to Do Next

Guides on arbitration

If the thought of going to court stresses you out, you’re not alone. Many Americans who are sued for credit card debt utilize a Motion to Compel Arbitration to push their case out of court and into arbitration.

Below are some resources on how to use an arbitration clause to your advantage and win a debt lawsuit.

• How Arbitration Works
• How to Find an Arbitration Clause in Your Credit Agreement
• How to Make a Motion to Compel Arbitration
• How to Make a Motion to Compel Arbitration in Florida
• How to Make a Motion to Compel Arbitration Without an Attorney
• How Credit Card Arbitration Works
• Sample Motion to Compel Arbitration

Stop calls from debt collectors

Do you keep getting calls from an unknown number, only to realize that it’s a debt collector on the other line? If you’ve been called by any of the following numbers, chances are you have collectors coming after you, and we’ll tell you how to stop them.

• 1-800-390-7584
• 800-289-8004
• 800-955-6600
• 877-366-0169
• 877-591-0747
• 800-278-2420
• 800-604-0064
• 800-846-6406
• 877-317-0948
• 888-899-4332
• 888-912-7925
• 202-367-9070
• 502-267-7522

Federal debt collection laws can protect you

Knowing your rights makes it easier to stand up for your rights. Below, we’ve compiled all our articles on federal debt collection laws that protect you from unfair practices.

• 15 USC 1692 Explained
• Does the Fair Credit Reporting Act Work in Florida?
• FDCPA Violations List
• How to File an FDCPA Complaint Against Your Debt Collector (Ultimate Guide)
• How to Make a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act Demand Letter
• How to Submit a Transunion Dispute
• How to Submit an Equifax Dispute
• How to Submit an Experian Dispute
• What Debt Collectors Cannot Do — FDCPA Explained
• What Does Account Information Disputed by Consumer Meets FCRA Requirements Mean?
• What does “meets FCRA requirements” mean?
• What does FCRA stand for?
• What is the Consumer Credit Protection Act

Get debt relief in your state

We’ve created a specialized guide on how to find debt relief in all 50 states, complete with steps to take to find relief, state-specific resources, and more.

Debt collection laws in all 50 states

Debt collection laws vary by state, so we have compiled a guide to each state’s debt collection laws to make it easier for you to stand up for your rights—no matter where you live.

• Debt Collection Laws in Alabama
• Debt Collection Laws in Alaska
• Debt Collection Laws in Arizona
• Debt Collection Laws in Arkansas
• Debt Collection Laws in California
• Debt Collection Laws in Colorado
• Debt Collection Laws in Connecticut
• Debt Collection Laws in Delaware
• Debt Collection Laws in Florida
• Debt Collection Laws in Georgia
• Debt Collection Laws in Hawaii
• Debt Collection Laws in Kansas
• Debt Collection Laws in Idaho
• Debt Collection Laws in Illinois
• Debt Collection Laws in Indiana
• Debt Collection Laws in Iowa
• Debt Collection Laws in Kentucky
• Debt Collection Laws in Louisiana
• Debt Collection Laws in Massachusetts
• Debt Collection Laws in Michigan
• Debt Collection Laws in Minnesota
• Debt Collection Laws in Mississippi
• Debt Collection Laws in Missouri
• Debt Collection Laws in Montana
• Debt Collection Laws in Nebraska
• Debt Collection Laws in Nevada
• Debt Collection Laws in New Hampshire
• Debt Collection Laws in New Jersey
• Debt Collection Laws in New Mexico
• Debt Collection Laws in New York
• Debt Collection Laws in North Carolina
• Debt Collection Laws in North Dakota
• Debt Collection Laws in Ohio
• Debt Collection Laws in Oklahoma
• Debt Collection Laws in Oregon
• Debt Collection Laws in Pennsylvania
• Debt Collection Laws in Rhode Island
• Debt Collection Laws in South Carolina
• Debt Collection Laws in South Dakota
• Debt Collection Laws in Tennessee
• Debt Collection Laws in Texas
• Debt Collection Laws in Vermont
• Debt Collection Laws in Virginia
• Debt Collection Laws in Washington
• Debt Collection Laws in West Virginia
• Debt Collection Laws in Wisconsin
• Debt Collection Laws in Wyoming

Statute of limitations on debt state guides

Like all debt collection laws, the statute of limitations on debt varies by state. So, we wrote a guide on each state’s statutes. Check it out below.

Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection by State (Best Guide)

• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Alabama
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Alaska
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Arizona
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Arkansas
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in California
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Connecticut
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Colorado
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Delaware
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Florida
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Georgia
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Hawaii
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Illinois
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Indiana
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Iowa
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Kansas
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Louisiana
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Maine
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Maryland
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Michigan
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Minnesota
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Mississippi
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Missouri
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Montana
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Nebraska
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Nevada
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in New Hampshire
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in New Jersey
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in New Mexico
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in New York
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in North Carolina
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in North Dakota
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Oklahoma
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Oregon
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Oregon (Complete Guide)
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Pennsylvania
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Rhode Island
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in South Carolina
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in South Dakota
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Tennessee
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Texas
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Utah
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Vermont
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Virginia
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Washington
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in West Virginia
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Wisconsin
• Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection in Wyoming

Check the status of your court case

Don’t have time to go to your local courthouse to check the status of your case? We’ve created a guide on how to check the status of your case in every state, complete with online search tools and court directories.

• Alabama Court Case Search—Find Your Lawsuit
• Alaska Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Arizona Court Case Search - Find Your Lawsuit
• Arkansas Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• California Court Case Search- Find Your Lawsuit
• Colorado Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Connecticut Case Lookup — Find Your Court Case
• Delaware Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Florida Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Georgia Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Hawaii Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Idaho Court Case Search – Find Your Lawsuit
• Illinois Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Indiana Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Iowa Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Kansas Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Kentucky Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Louisiana Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Maine Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Maryland Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Massachusetts Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Michigan Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Minnesota Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Mississippi Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Missouri Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Montana Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Nebraska Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Nevada Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• New Hampshire Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• New Jersey Court Case Search—Find Your Lawsuit
• New Mexico Court Case Search - Find Your Lawsuit
• New York Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• North Carolina Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• North Dakota Court Case Search �� Find Your Lawsuit
• Ohio Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Oklahoma Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Oregon Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Pennsylvania Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Rhode Island Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• South Carolina Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• South Dakota Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Tennessee Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Texas Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Utah Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Vermont Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Virginia Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Washington Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• West Virginia Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Wisconsin Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit
• Wyoming Court Case Search — Find Your Lawsuit

How to stop wage garnishment in your state

Forgot to respond to your debt lawsuit? The judge may have ordered a default judgment against you, and with a default judgment, debt collectors can garnish your wages. Here are our guides on how to stop wage garnishment in all 50 states.

• Stop Wage Garnishment in Alabama
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Alaska
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Arizona
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Arkansas
• Stop Wage Garnishment in California
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Colorado
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Connecticut
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Delaware
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Florida
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Georgia
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Hawaii
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Idaho
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Illinois
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Indiana
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Iowa
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Kansas
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Kentucky
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Louisiana
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Maine
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Maryland
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Massachusetts
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Michigan
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Minnesota
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Mississippi
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Missouri
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Montana
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Nevada
• Stop Wage Garnishment in New Hampshire
• Stop Wage Garnishment in New Jersey
• Stop Wage Garnishment in New Mexico
• Stop Wage Garnishment in New York
• Stop Wage Garnishment in North Carolina
• Stop Wage Garnishment in North Dakota
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Ohio
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Oklahoma
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Oregon
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Pennsylvania
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Rhode Island
• Stop Wage Garnishment in South Carolina
• Stop Wage Garnishment in South Dakota
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Tennessee
• Stop Wage Garnishment In Texas
• Stop Wage Garnishment In Utah
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Vermont
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Virginia
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Washington
• Stop Wage Garnishment in West Virginia
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Wisconsin
• Stop Wage Garnishment in Wyoming

Other wage garnishment resources

• Bank Account Garnishment and Liens in Texas
• Can I Stop Wage Garnishment?
• Can My Wife's Bank Account Be Garnished for My Debt?
• Can Payday Loans Garnish Your Wages?
• Can pensions be garnished?
• Can Private Disability Payments Be Garnished?
• Can Social Security Disability Be Garnished?
• Can They Garnish Your Wages for Credit Card Debt?
• Can You Stop a Garnishment Once It Starts?
• Guide to Garnishment Limits by State
• How Can I Stop Wage Garnishments Immediately?
• How Long Before a Creditor Can Garnish Wages?
• How Long Does It Take to Get Garnished Wages Back?
• How to Fight a Wage Garnishment
• How to Prevent Wage Garnishment
• How to Stop a Garnishment
• How to Stop Social Security Wage Garnishment
• How to Stop Wage Garnishment — Everything You Need to Know
• New York Garnishment Laws – Overview
• Ohio Garnishment Laws — What They Say
• Wage Garnishment Lawyer
• What Is Wage Garnishment?

How to settle a debt in your state

Debt settlement is one of the most effective ways to resolve a debt and save money. We’ve created a guide on how to settle your debt in all 50 states. Find out how to settle in your state with a simple click and explore other debt settlement resources below.

• How to Settle a Debt in Alabama
• How to Settle a Debt in Alaska
• How to Settle a Debt in Arizona
• How to Settle a Debt in Arkansas
• How to Settle a Debt in California
• How to Settle a Debt in Colorado
• How to Settle a Debt in Delaware
• How to Settle a Debt in Florida
• How to Settle a Debt in Hawaii
• How to Settle a Debt in Idaho
• How to Settle a Debt in Illinois
• How to Settle a Debt in Indiana
• How to Settle a Debt in Iowa
• How to Settle a Debt in Kansas
• How to Settle a Debt in Kentucky
• How to Settle a Debt in Louisiana
• How to Settle a Debt in Maryland
• How to Settle a Debt in Massachusetts
• How to Settle a Debt in Michigan
• How to Settle a Debt in Minnesota
• How to Settle a Debt in Mississippi
• How to Settle a Debt in Missouri
• How to Settle a Debt in Montana
• How to Settle a Debt in Nebraska
• How to Settle a Debt in Nevada
• How to Settle a Debt in New Hampshire
• How to Settle a Debt in New Jersey
• How to Settle a Debt in New Mexico
• How to Settle a Debt in New York
• How to Settle a Debt in North Carolina
• How to Settle a Debt in North Dakota
• How to Settle a Debt in Ohio
• How to Settle a Debt in Oklahoma
• How to Settle a Debt in Oregon
• How to Settle a Debt in Pennsylvania
• How to Settle a Debt in South Carolina
• How to Settle a Debt in South Dakota
• How to Settle a Debt in Tennessee
• How to Settle a Debt in Texas
• How to Settle a Debt in Utah
• How to Settle a Debt in Vermont
• How to Settle a Debt in Virginia
• How to Settle a Debt in West Virginia
• How to Settle a Debt in Wisconsin
• How to Settle a Debt in Wyoming

How to settle with every debt collector

Not sure how to negotiate a debt settlement with a debt collector? We are creating guides to help you know how to start the settlement conversation and increase your chances of coming to an agreement with every debt collector.

• American Express
• Capitol One
• Cavalry SPV
• Midland Funding
• Moore Law Group
• Navy Federal
• NCB Management Services
• Portfolio Recovery

Other debt settlement resources

• Best Debt Settlement Companies
• Can I Settle a Debt After Being Served?
• Can I Still Settle a Debt After Being Served?
• Can You Settle a Warrant in Debt Before Court?
• Debt Management vs. Debt Settlement
• Debt Settlement Pros and Cons
• Debt Settlement Scam
• Do I Need to Hire a Debt Settlement Lawyer?
• Do You Need a Debt Settlement Attorney in Houston Texas?
• Do You Owe Taxes on Settled Debt?
• Here’s a Sample Letter to Collection Agencies to Settle Debt
• How Can I Settle My Credit Card Debt Before Going to Court?
• How Do I Know if a Debt Settlement Company Is Legitimate?
• How Long Does a Lawsuit Take to Settle?
• How Much Do Settlement Companies Charge?
• How I Settled My Credit Card Debt With Discover
• How to Make a Debt Settlement Agreement
• How to Make a Settlement Offer to Navient
• How to Negotiate a Debt Settlement with a Law Firm
• How to send Santander a settlement letter
• How to Settle Debt for Pennies on the Dollar
• How to Settle Debt in 3 Steps
• How to Settle Debt with a Reduced Lump Sum Payment
• How to Settle a Credit Card Debt Lawsuit — Ultimate Guide
• How to Settle Credit Card Debt When a Lawsuit Has Been Filed
• If You Are Using a Debt Relief Agency, Can You Settle Yourself with the Creditor?
• Largest Debt Settlement Companies
• Should I Settle a Collection or Pay in Full?
• Summary of the Equifax Data Breach Settlement
• The Advantages of Pre-Settlement Lawsuit Funding
• The FTC Regulates Debt Settlement Through the Telemarketing Sales Rule
• The Pros and Cons of Debt Settlement
• What Happens if I Reject a Settlement Offer?
• What Happens if You Don't Pay a Debt Settlement?
• What Happens When You Settle a Debt?
• What Is A Debt Settlement Agreement?
• What is Debt Settlement?
• What Percentage Should I Offer to Settle Debt?
• What to Ask for in a Settlement Agreement
• Who Qualifies for Debt Settlement?
• Will Collection Agencies Settle for Less?
• 5 Signs of a Debt Settlement Scam

Personal loan and debt relief reviews

We give a factual review of the following debt consolidation, debt settlement, and loan organizations and companies to help you make an informed decision before you take on a debt.

• Accredited Debt Relief Debt Settlement Reviews
• Advance America Loan Review
• ACE Cash Express Personal Loan Review
• BMG Money Loan Review
• BMO Harris Bank Review: Pros and Cons
• Brite Solutions Debt Settlement Reviews
• Caliber Home Loans Mortgage Review
• Cambridge Debt Consolidation Review
• Campus Debt Solutions Review
• CashNetUSA Review
• Century Debt Settlement Reviews
• ClearPoint Debt Management Review
• Click N Loan Reviews
• CuraDebt Debt Settlement Review
• CuraDebt Reviews: Debt Relief Assistance For California Residents
• Debt Eraser Review
• Debtconsolidation.com Debt Settlement Reviews
• Eagle One Debt Settlement Reviews
• Freedom Debt Relief Debt Settlement Reviews
• Global Holdings Debt Settlement Reviews
• Golden 1 Credit Union Personal Loan Review
• Honda Financial Services Review
• iLending Reviews
• Infinite Law Group Debt Settlement Reviews
• JG Wentworth Debt Settlement Reviews
• LoanMart Reviews
• Mastriani Law Firm Review
• Milestone ® Mastercard ® Review
• ModoLoan Review
• Money Management International Reviews
• M&T Mortgage Company Review
• National Debt Relief Debt Settlement Reviews
• New Era Debt Settlement Reviews
• OppLoans Review
• Pacific Debt Relief Reviews
• Palisade Legal Group Debt Settlement Reviews
• PCG Debt Consolidation Review
• PenFed Auto Loan Review
• Priority Plus Financial Reviews
• Roseland Associates Debt Consolidation Review
• SDCCU Debt Consolidation Review
• Speedy Cash Loans Review
• Symple Lending Reviews
• Tripoint Lending Reviews
• TurboDebt Debt Settlement Reviews
• Turnbull Law Group Debt Settlement Reviews
• United Debt Settlement Reviews
• Upgrade Auto Loans Reviews

How to repair and improve your credit score

Debt has a big impact on your credit. Below is a list of guides on how to repair and improve your credit, even while managing major debt.

• 3 Ways to Repair Your Credit with Debt Collections
• 5 Pros and Cons of Credit Cards & How to Use Them Wisely
• 6 Reasons Your Credit Score Isn't Going Up
• Bankruptcy vs Debt Settlement: Which is Better for Your Credit Score?
• Does Debt Consolidation Hurt Your Credit Score?
• Does Wage Garnishment Affect Credit?
• Guide to Disclosing Income on Your Credit Card Application
• How Long Does It Take to Improve My Credit Score After Debt Settlement?
• How Often Does Merrick Bank Increase Your Credit Limit?
• How to fix your credit to buy a house
• How to Handle Debt and Improve Credit
• How to Raise My Credit Score 40 Points Fast
• If I Settle with a Collection Agency, Will It Hurt My Credit?
• Is 600 a Good Credit Score?
• Obama Credit Card Debt Relief Program – How to Use It
• Sample credit report dispute letter
• Should I Use Credit Journey?
• Understanding myFICO: Your Gateway to Better Credit
• What Does "DLA" Mean on a Credit Report?
• What Is A Good Credit Score For Businesses?
• What is American Credit Acceptance?
• What is CBNA on my credit report?
• What is CreditFresh?
• Who Made the Credit Score?
• Why is THD/CBNA on my credit report?

How to resolve student loan debt

Struggling with student debt? SoloSuit’s got you covered. Below are resources on handling student loan debt.

• Budgeting Strategies for Students: How to Manage Your Finances Wisely
• Can You Go to Jail for Not Paying Student Loans?
• Can You Settle Student Loan Debt?
• Do Student Loans Go Away After 7 Years? (2022 Guide)
• Do You Need a Student Loan Lawyer? (Complete Guide)
• Does Student Debt Die With You?
• How to Manage a Student Debt
• How to Get Rid of Student Loan Debt
• Mandatory Forbearance Request Student Loan Debt Burden
• Negative Economic Effects of Student Loan Debt on the US Economy
• Pros and Cons of Taking a Student Loan
• Regional Adjustment Bureau Student Loans – How to Win
• The Real Impact of Student Debt: How Our Brains Handle It
• Why It's Important to Teach Students How to Manage Debt
• 5 Alternatives to Taking a Student Loan
• 5 Tips for Students: How to Create a Realistic and Effective Budget
• 7 College Financial Planning Tips for Students
• 7 Things to Consider When Taking a Student Loan
• 7 Tips to Manage Your Student Loans

Civil law legal definitions

You can represent yourself in court. Save yourself the time and cost of finding an attorney, and use the following resources to understand legal definitions better and how they may apply to your case.

• Accleration Clause — Definition
• Adjuster - Defined
• Adverse Action — Definition
• Affidavit — A Definition
• Annulment vs. divorce – what's the difference?
• Anticipatory Repudiation — Definition
• Bench Trial — Defined
• Certificate of Debt: A Definition
• Commuted Sentence – Definition
• Constructive Eviction - Defined
• Constructive Discharge - Definition
• Defendant - Definition and Everything You Need to Know
• Demurred – Definition
• Dischargeable - Definition
• Disclosures — Definition
• False Imprisonment Defined
• Good Faith Exception – Definition
• Hearsay — A Definition
• HOEPA – Definition
• Implied Contract – Definition
• Injunctive Relief — A Definition
• Intestate–Defined
• Irrevocable Agreement — Defined
• Joint Custody–Defined
• Litigator — A Definition
• Mediation - Definition
• Medical Malpractice — Definition
• Mistrial — A Definition
• Mitigating Circumstances — Definition
• Motion for Summary Judgment — Definition
• Nolle Prosequi – Definition
• Nunc Pro Tunc — A Definition
• Plaintiff - Definition and Everything You Need to Know
• Pro Se - Defined
• Probable Cause Hearing — Definition
• Restitution – Definition
• Sole Custody-Defined
• Statute of Limitations—Definition and Everything You Need to Know
• Summons—Definition
• Tenancy in Common – Defined
• Time Is of the Essence – Definition
• What Is the Bankruptcy Definition of Consumer Debt?
• Wrongful Termination–Defined

Get answers to these FAQs on debt collection

• Am I Responsible for My Husband's Debts If We Divorce?
• Am I Responsible for My Parent's Debt if I Have Power of Attorney?
• Can a Collection Agency Add Fees on the Debt?
• Can a Collection Agency Charge Interest on a Debt?
• Can a Credit Card Company Sue Me?
• Can a Debt Collector Freeze Your Bank Account?
• Can a Debt Collector Leave a Voicemail?
• Can a Debt Collector Take My Car in California?
• Can a Judgment Creditor Take my Car?
• Can a Process Server Leave a Summons Taped to My Door?
• Can an Eviction Be Reversed?
• Can Credit Card Companies Garnish Your Wages?
• Can Credit Cards Garnish Wages?
• Can Debt Collectors Call From Local Numbers?
• Can Debt Collectors Call You at Work in Texas?
• Can Debt Collectors Call Your Family?
• Can Debt Collectors Leave Voicemails?
• Can I Pay a Debt Before the Court Date?
• Can I Rent an Apartment if I Have Debt in Collection?
• Can I Sue the President for Emotional Distress?
• Can the SCRA Stop a Default Judgment?
• Can the Statute of Limitations be Extended?
• Can You Appeal a Default Judgement?
• Can You Get Unemployment if You Quit?
• Can You Go to Jail for a Payday Loan?
• Can You Go to Jail for Credit Card Debt?
• Can You Negotiate with Westlake Financial?
• Can You Record a Call with a Debt Collector in Your State?
• Can You Serve Someone with a Collections Lawsuit at Their Work?
• Can You Sue Someone Who Has Filed Chapter 7 Bankruptcy?
• Capital One is Suing Me – How Can I Win?
• Debt Snowball vs. Debt Avalanche: Which One Is Apt for You?
• Do 609 Letters Really Work?
• Do Debt Collectors Ever Give Up?
• Do I Have Too Much Debt to Divorce My Spouse?
• Do I Need a Debt Collection Defense Attorney?
• Do I Need a Debt Negotiator?
• Do I Need a Legal Coach?
• Do I Need a Payday Loans Lawyer?
• Does a Living Trust Protect Your Assets from Lawsuits?
• Does Chase Sue for Credit Card Debt?
• Does Debt Consolidation Have Risks?
• Does Midland Funding Show Up to Court?
• How Can I Get Financial Assistance in PA?
• How do Debt Relief Scams Work?
• How Do I Find Out If I Have Any Judgments Against Me?
• How Do I Get Rid of a Judgment Lien on My Property?
• How Do I Register on the Do Not Call List?
• How Does a Flex Loan Work?
• How Does Debt Affect Your Ability to Buy a Home?
• How Does Finwise Bank Work?
• How does Navy Credit debt forgiveness work?
• How Does Payments.tsico Work?
• How Important is it to Protect your Assets from Unexpected Events?
• How is Debt Divided in Divorce?
• How Long Do Creditors Have to Collect a Debt from an Estate?
• How long do debt collectors take to respond to debt validation letters?
• How Long Does a Judgement Last?
• How Long Does a Judgment Last?
• How Long Does a Levy Stay on a Bank Account?
• How Long Does an Eviction Stay on Your Record?
• How Many Calls from a Debt Collector is Considered Harassment?
• How Many Times Can a Judgment Be Renewed in North Carolina?
• How Many Times Can a Judgment be Renewed in Oklahoma?
• How Much Do Collection Agencies Pay for Debt?
• How Much Do You Have to Be in Debt to File Chapter 7?
• How Much Does College Actually Cost?
• How Often Do Credit Card Companies Sue for Non-Payment?
• How Should You Respond to the Theft of Your Identity?
• I am being sued because my identity was stolen - What do I do?
• If a Car is Repossessed Do I Still Owe the Debt?
• Is Debt Forgiveness Taxable?
• Is Freedom Debt Relief a Scam?
• Is it Legal for Debt Collectors to Call Family Members?
• Is it Smart to Consolidate Debt?
• Is LVNV Funding a Legitimate Company? - Them in Court
• Is My Case in the Right Venue?
• Is Portfolio Recovery Associates Legit? — How to Win
• Is Severance Pay Taxable?
• Is SoloSuit Worth It?
• Is Someone with Power of Attorney Responsible for Debt After Death?
• Is the NTB Credit Card Safe?
• Is There a Judgment Against Me Without my Knowledge?
• Is transworld systems legitimate? — How to win in court
• Liquidate–What Does it Mean?
• Litigation Finance: Is it a Good Investment?
• Received a 3-Day Eviction Notice? Here's What To Do
• Should I File Bankruptcy Before or After a Judgment?
• Should I Hire a Civil Litigation Attorney?
• Should I Hire a Civil Rights Lawyer?
• Should I Hire a Litigation Attorney?
• Should I Marry Someone With Debt?
• Should I Pay Off an Old Apartment Debt?
• Should I Send a Demand Letter Before a Lawsuit?
• Should I Use My IRA to Pay Off Credit Card Debt?
• Should You Communicate with a Debt Collector in Writing or by Telephone?
• Should You Invest in Stocks While In Debt?
• Subsidized vs. Unsubsidized Loans: Which is Better?
• The Truth: Should You Never Pay a Debt Collection Agency?
• What are the biggest debt collector companies in the US?
• What are the different types of debt?
• What Bank Is Behind Best Buy's Credit Card?
• What Bank Issues Kohl's Credit Card?
• What Bank Owns Old Navy Credit Card?
• What Credit Bureau does Aqua Finance Use?
• What Credit Bureau Does Truliant Use?
• What Does “Apple Pay Transaction Under Review” Mean?
• What Does a Debt Collector Have to Prove in Court?
• What Does BAC Stand For?
• What does HAFA stand for?
• What Does Payment Deferred Mean?
• What Does Reaffirmation of Debt Mean?
• What Happens After a Motion for Default Is Filed?
• What Happens at a Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing?
• What Happens If a Defendant Does Not Pay a Judgment?
• What Happens If a Process Server Can't Serve You?
• What Happens if a Tenant Wins an Eviction Lawsuit?
• What Happens If Someone Sues You and You Have No Money?
• What Happens If You Avoid Getting Served Court Papers?
• What Happens If You Don’t Pay Speedy Cash?
• What Happens If You Ignore a Debt Collector?
• What Happens If You Never Answer Debt Collectors?
• What Happens When a Debt Is Sold to a Collection Agency
• What Happens When a Debt Is Sold to a Collection Agency?
• What If a Summons Was Served to the Wrong Person?
• What If an Order for Default Was Entered?
• What if I default on an Avant payment?
• What If the Wrong Defendant Is Named in a Lawsuit?
• What Is a Case Number?
• What is a Certificate of Judgment in Ohio?
• What Is a Certificate of Service?
• What Is a Civil Chapter 61 Warrant?
• What is a Civil Litigation Lawyer?
• What Is a Consent Judgment?
• What Is a CPN Number?
• What Is a Debt Brokerage?
• What Is a Debt-to-Sales Ratio?
• What Is a Defamation Lawsuit?
• What is a default judgment?— What do I do?
• What Is a Libel Lawsuit?
• What is a Lien on a House?
• What is a Lien Release on a Car?
• What is a Lien?
• What Is a Motion to Strike?
• What Is a Motion to Suppress?
• What Is a Non-Dischargeable Debt in Tennessee?
• What Is a Nonsuit Without Prejudice?
• What Is a Preliminary Hearing?
• What Is a Reaffirmation Agreement?
• What Is a Request for Dismissal?
• What Is a Rule 3.740 Collections Defense in California?
• What Is a Slander Lawsuit?
• What is a Stipulated Judgment?
• What Is a Warrant in Debt?
• What is ABC Financial Club Charge?
• What is ACS Ed Services?
• What is Advanced Call Center Technologies?
• What is Alimony?
• What Is Allied Interstate's Phone Number?
• What is an Affirmative Defense?
• What Is an Assignment of Debt?
• What Is an Attorney Malpractice Lawsuit?
• What Is an Unlawful Detainer Lawsuit?
• What is Bank of America CashPro?
• What is Bitty Advance?
• What Is Celtic Bank?
• What is Consumer Portfolio Services?
• What Is Credence Resource Management?
• What Is Debt Internment?
• What Is Discover's 60/60 plan?
• What is Evading the Police?
• What Is Extinguishment of Debt?
• What is First Investors Financial Services?
• What is Global Lending Services?
• What is homicide?
• What Is Lexington Law Firm?
• What is LGFCU Personal Loan?
• What is Moral Turpitude?
• What is Online Information Services?
• What is Oportun?
• What Is Service of Process in Texas?
• What is sewer service?
• What Is Summary Judgment?
• What is Synchrony Bank's Hardship Program?
• What Is T-Mobile's Phone Number for Debt Collection?
• What Is the Amount of Money You Still Owe to Their Credit Card Company Called?
• What is the Deadline for a Defendant's Answer to Avoid a Default Judgment?
• What Is the Formula for Calculating Closing Costs?
• What Is the Minimum Amount That a Collection Agency Will Sue For?
• What Is the Phone Number for IQ Data?
• What is the Purpose of the Truth in the Lending Act?
• What is the status of my case?
• What Is the Statute of Limitations on Debt in Washington?
• What is the Telemarketing Sales Rule?
• What is Unsecured Credit Card Debt?
• What is WCTCB?
• What is WFDS?
• What is WUVISAAFT?
• What is Zombie Debt, and How Do I Deal With It?
• What Personal Property Can Be Seized in a Judgment?
• What Should I Do If Crown Asset Management Suing Me?
• What Should I Do If OneMain Financial Is Taking Me to Court?
• What Should You Do if You Can't Pay Your Mortgage?
• What states require a professional licensing number for debt collectors?
• When Does Exeter Finance Repo Cars?
• When Is My Rent Due Legally?
• Where’s My Amended Tax Return?
• Which Bank Does Macy's Credit Card Use?
• Who is EOSCCA?
• Who is Over the Loan Forgiveness Program at KHESLC?
• Who is Synchrony Bank? — Beat Them in Court
• Who is Jefferson Capital Systems LLC — How to win in court
• Why Being Judgment Proof Is Not a Defense to a Lawsuit
• Why Can't Lawyers Give Legal Advice?
• Who is Synchrony Bank? — Them in Court
• Why Do Debt Collectors Block Their Phone Numbers?
• Why Do Lawyers Charge So Much?
• Why Is the Sheriff Looking for Me?
• Why Would a Sheriff Come to My House with Papers?
• Will Bankruptcy Stop a Judgment?

How-to debt guides

• How to Beat Westlake Portfolio Management
• How to Access Free Debt Relief
• How to Answer a Lawsuit for Debt Collection
• How to Appear in Court by Phone
• How to Apply For Unemployment Benefits in Florida
• How to Avoid Getting Served
• How to Beat a Bill Collector in Court
• How to Beat a Debt Collector in Court
• How to Beat a Lawsuit From a Debt Collector
• How to Cancel a Merrick Bank Credit Card
• How to Cancel an American Eagle Credit Card: A Step-by-Step Guide
• How to Cancel JCPenney Credit Card
• How to Deal with Debt Collectors
• How to decide what to do next in a lawsuit
• How to Defend Yourself in Court
• How To Develop A Debt Repayment Plan That Works
• How to Discharge a Debt with UCC
• How to Dispute a Debt and Win
• How to Dispute a False Positive Drug Test
• How to dispute a rental collection
• How to Drag Out an Eviction
• How to Fight a Motion for Relief From Automatic Stay
• How to Fight an Eviction
• How to Fight Debt Collectors in Court and Win
• How to File a Civil Answer in Kings County Supreme Court
• How to File a Civil Answer With the Duval Clerk of Courts - Florida
• How to File a Motion to Extend Time
• How to File a Motion to Satisfy Judgment in Utah
• How to File a Motion to Set Aside Judgment
• How to File Chapter 13 Without an Attorney
• How to File in Bergen County Superior Court
• How to File in Deschutes County Circuit Court
• How to File in Josephine County Courthouse
• How to File in Miamisburg Municipal Court
• How to File in Monmouth County Courthouse
• How to File in Oak Grove Courthouse
• How to File in Oregon Small Claims Court
• How to File in Small Claims Court in Iowa
• How to File in the Houston County Superior Court
• How To Fill Out the PLD-C-001
• How to Find My Bridgecrest Login
• How to Find Out If You're Being Sued
• How to Find Out What Collection Agency Owns Your Debt
• How to Find the Attorney That is Suing You (Secret)
• How to get a case dismissed without prejudice on statute of limitations
• How to Get a Divorce in Florida
• How to Get Credit Card Debt Relief
• How to Get Debt Relief (Ultimate 50 State Guide 2023)
• How to Get Out of a Bridgecrest Loan
• How to get out of a RISE loan
• How to Get Out of Debt Before Retirement
• How to Get Out of Paying HOA Dues
• How to Get Relief From a Gambling Debt
• How to Hire a Mediator
• How to Identify Age Discrimination in the Employment Act
• How to identify fake and abusive debt collectors
• How to Liquidate Credit Cards Into Cash
• How to liquidate your assets to pay off debt
• How to Make a 609 Letter That Really Works
• How to Make a Debt Validation Letter - The Ultimate Guide (2023)
• How to Make a Motion to Dismiss
• How to Make a Motion to Lift Stay
• How to Make a Motion to Vacate Judgment
• How to Make a Will
• How to Make an Eviction Appeal
• How to Make Motion to Set Aside — Ultimate Guide
• How to Negotiate a Lien on a House
• How to Negotiate Credit Card Debts
• How to Paramount Recovery
• How To Pay for College and Avoid Debt
• How to Pay off Your Destiny Credit Card
• How to Perform Voluntary Repossession
• How to Protect Your LLC with a Registered Agent Service
• How to Recover from a Negative Bank Balance
• How to Report the Cancellation of a Debt on a 1040
• How to Respond to a Debt Collection Summons in Wyoming
• How to Respond to a Debt Lawsuit vs United Collection Bureau
• How to Respond to a Lawsuit Against Northstar Location Services
• How to Respond to a Sheriff's Note On Your Door
• How to respond to a Summons from VanSlam, Inc
• How to Respond to Plaintiff's Counsel
• How To Respond to Request for Admission
• How to Satisfy a Judgment
• How to Spot Common IRS Scams
• How to Stop Eviction Lawyers
• How to Stop Pinnacle Collections Agency
• How to Support Employees With Debt – HR Solution
• How to Use a Bonus to Solve Your Financial Problems
• How to Travel Without Falling into Debt: Embracing the "Workcation"
• How to Use King County Superior Court Electronic Filing
• How to Use Montgomery County E-Filing
• How to use My.Loanbuilder
• How to Use the Doctrine of Unclean Hands
• How to Walk Away from Credit Card Debt
• How to Win a Citibank Debt Lawsuit
• How to Win a Collect Pros Dispute
• How to Win a Credit One Bank Lawsuit
• How to Win a Debt Lawsuit Against Security Credit Services
• How to Win a Freedom Debt Relief Lawsuit
• How To Win a Mariner Finance Lawsuit
• How to Win a Portfolio Recovery Associates Debt Lawsuit
• How to Win When Sued by Blitt & Gaines
• How to Win When Sued by Pharia LLC
• How to Win When You're Sued by Paragon Revenue Group
• How to Write a Hardship Letter
• How to Write a Re-Aging Debt Letter

Learn more with these additional debt resources

• A Comprehensive Guide to Business Loans in the U.S.
• Bar Associations for All 50 States
• Bank of America Is Suing Me For Credit Card Debt — How to win
• Best Debt Consolidation Strategies
• Biggest Debt Collection Agencies (2023)
• Budgeting for Language Learning: Tips for Language Enthusiasts in Debt
• BYU Personal Finance Online Course (How to Get Back on Track After a Debt Lawsuit)
• Collection Agencies Phone Numbers
• Cómo resolver una deuda
• Cómo responder a una demanda civil por deuda
• Countersuing a Company: A Step-By-Step Guide
• Credit Card Debt Forgiveness Act Explained
• Credit Card Debt Forgiveness Because of Disability
• Credit Repair Scam
• Debt Collection Ageny List (2022)
• Debt Collection Attorneys Near Me
• Debt Collection Litigation Industry Report 2023
• Debt Relief Programs 2023
• Debt Validation Letter Template
• Debt-Free Strategies: Leveraging Cash Value Life Insurance to Achieve Financial Freedom
• Defending Yourself in Court Against a Debt Collector
• Difference Between a Trial and a Hearing
• Do This If You're Sued by Express Recovery for Debt
• Don't Make a Payment to Arnold Scott Harris
• Everything You Need to Know About Getting Divorced
• Forging a Path to Debt-Free College: Innovative Approaches to Financing Your Higher Education
• Free Legal Aid in Bullhead City, Arizona
• Free Legal Aid in Marion, Ohio
• Fruit of the Poisonous Tree
• Going to Court for Credit Card Debt - Everything You Need to Know
• Going to Court for Credit Card Debt — Key Tips
• Guide to Elderly Debt Collection Laws
• Hearing Vs. Trial
• Help! A Debt Collector Is Calling My Work
• Help! I'm Being Sued by My Debt Collector
• Here Is Ocwen's Mailing Address
• Here's the Phone Number for Colinfobur (a Debt Collector)
• Hours of Service Violations - 10 Effects
• How a CPA Can Save Your Small Business Money
• How Attorney Contingency Fees Work
• How Credit Counseling and Financial Education Can Help You Manage Debt
• How Debt Affects Mental Health
• How Do You Demonstrate Financial Hardship?
• How Eviction Works for Renters
• How I Won My Credit Card Debt Lawsuit (Interview)
• How Legal Billing Software Streamlines Trust Fund Management
• How Not to Pay a Judgment
• How the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Debt Collection Rule Applies to You
• How VPNs Protect Your Financial Privacy and Assist in Debt Relief
• I Got Sued Because of Credit Card Fraud—How I Beat American Express in Court
• I'm in Debt With No Job and No Money — What to Do
• Importance of Identity Verification for Buy Now Pay Later Providers
• Interview With A Former Debt Collector
• Is Zombie Debt Still a Problem in 2019
• Kentucky Debt Collection Laws — What You Need to Know
• Lawsuit Deadline Calculator (The best one!)
• Legal Aid in All 50 States
• Legal Aid in the US Ultimate Guide (2022)
• Legal Support Services for Debt Collection
• Liquidated Debt vs. Unliquidated Debt
• Living Trust vs. Will—Which One You Need
• Luxury on a Budget: 10 Ways to Have Luxury Experiences While Managing Debt
• Make Solomon and Solomon PC validate a debt
• Make Stephen Einstein validate a debt
• Massachusetts Debt Collection Laws – What They Say
• Money Management Tips for Senior Citizens
• Motion for Default Judgment - Everything You Need to Know
• My Bank Account is Negative $1,000 — Fix it
• National Debt Relief Screwed Me — What to Do Next
• Navigating Your Finances Wisely: A Look at the Best Credit Cards of 2023
• New Debt Collection Laws 2022
• Nonsuit vs Dismissal in a Debt Collection Lawsuit
• Oregon Eviction Laws - What They Say
• Overcoming College Debt Challenges: Top Strategies for Financial Freedom
• Plaintiff vs Defendant — What's the difference
• Pro Se Meaning
• Q&A How to Resolve Your Debt Lawsuit (April 19, 2023)
• Q&A: How to Resolve Your Debt Lawsuit (July 12, 2023)
• Q&A: How to Resolve Your Debt Lawsuit (July 26, 2023)
• Q&A: How to Resolve Your Debt Lawsuit (June 21, 2023)
• Q&A: How to Resolve Your Debt Lawsuit (June 7, 2023)
• Q&A: How to Resolve Your Debt Lawsuit (May 17, 2023)
• Q&A: How to Resolve Your Debt Lawsuit (May 24, 2023)
• Q&A: How to Resolve Your Debt Lawsuit | May 10, 2023
• Q&A: Resolve Your Debt Lawsuit (May 3, 2023)
• Read This if You're Being Evicted With Children
• Resolve Your Collection Lawsuit in 3 Steps
• Resolve Your Debt Lawsuit Q&A (March 29, 2023)
• Resolve Your Debt With A Summons Response: A Step-by-Step Guide
• Respond to A Rocket Receivables Collector
• RICO Charge
• Sample Answer to Summons for Credit Card Debt Lawsuit
• Sample Cease and Desist Letter Against Debt Collectors
• Sample Letter to Remove a Charge-Off from Your Credit Report
• Sirote and Permutt Foreclosure - How to Win
• SoloSuit FAQ
• States Where You Can Go to Jail for Debt
• Stop Paying Credit Card Debt and Stop Worrying About It
• Successful Tips on Dealing With Debt Collectors During the Pandemic
• Tax Debt Compromise Program Scam
• Template Cease and Desist Letters to Debt Collectors
• The 7 Signs You Need Debt Help
• The best strategies for paying off credit card debt
• The Eviction Moratorium by State
• The Eviction Moratorium in Indiana Explained
• The Future of Legal Document Automation: Trends and Predictions
• The Impact of Debt on Your Psychological Well-being
• The Legal and Compliance Aspects of GPS Tracking: Key Considerations for Employers
• The Legal Process for Burn Injury Claims: What to Expect In California
• The Pros and Cons of Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
• The Pros and Cons of Using Real Estate to Generate Passive Income
• The Ultimate Guide to Responding to a Debt Collection Lawsuit in Utah (2023)
• Tips for Leaving the Country With Unpaid Credit Card Debt
• Top 7 Debt Collector Scare Tactics
• Top Side Hustles to Pay Off Debt
• Trespassing
• USC 15 Section 1662(b) Explained
• Use MacBook and Tech to Protect Yourself From Debt Collectors Online
• Use This 11 Word Phrase to Stop Debt Collectors
• Use this Sample Answer to Summons for Credit Card Debt
• Vermont Statute of Limitations on Debt
• West Virginia Statute of Limitations on Debt
• What Are the Phone Numbers for United Recovery Systems
• What Happens After I File an Answer to My Debt Lawsuit?
• What to Consider Before Signing a Stipulated Judgment, The Ultimate Guide
• What to Do About a Disputed Debt
• What to Do After Filing an Answer in a Debt Collection Lawsuit
• What to Do If a Debt Collector Is Attempting to Collect a Discharged Debt
• What to Do If a Debt Collector Sues You
• What to Do if You're Delinquent on Debt
• What to do when you get a fake court summons or phone call
• What to Say When You're in Court for Eviction
• What You Need to Know about ChexSystems
• Win Your Debt Lawsuit Q&A (April 5, 2023)
• You're Drowning in Debt — Here's How to Swim
• 3 Crazy Credit Card Debt Stories
• 3 Reasons Banks Can Freeze Your Account
• 3 Things to Know About Bright Lending
• 4 Ways to Get Local IRS Tax Help in Your State
• 5 Best Debt Reduction Services of 2022
• 5 Expenses You Can Cut to Save Money and Pay Off Debt
• 5 Legal and Deadly Lessons From Bicycle Accidents
• 5 Tips on How to Use Debt to Build Wealth
• 5 Ways Identity Theft Can Happen
• 7 Quick Solutions to Typical Family Money Problems
• 7 Ways to Protect Your Banking Information

It only takes 15 minutes. And 50% of our customers' cases have been dismissed in the past.

"Finding yourself on the wrong side of the law unexpectedly is kinda scary. I started researching on YouTube and found SoloSuit's channel. The videos were so helpful, easy to understand and encouraging. When I reached out to SoloSuit they were on it. Very professional, impeccably prompt. Thanks for the service!" – Heather

What is an Assignment of Debt?

By Sej Lamba

Updated on 23 July 2024 Reading time: 5 minutes

This article meets our strict editorial principles. Our lawyers, experienced writers and legally trained editorial team put every effort into ensuring the information published on our website is accurate. We encourage you to seek independent legal advice. Learn more .

When Could an Assignment of Debt Happen?

Key issues on assignment of debt, drafting the correct documentation, giving notice, key takeaways.

Debts are increasingly common in today’s financial climate, and unfortunately, many people struggle to repay what they owe. Debts owed can be sold to third parties and a lot of companies in the UK purchase debts. However, this can be complicated as specific legal formalities apply when assigning debts. This article will explain some of the critical issues around the assignment of debt. 

Debt collection can be a complex process. There are various reasons as to why debt is assigned. For example, a company owed debt may want to avoid putting in time and effort to chase it or want to take legal action to recover it. 

To picture a scenario, imagine this:

• Joe Bloggs gets a brand-new shiny credit card. Joe purchases lots of nice things for his family with the credit card. Usually, he can keep up with payments as he keeps track of them and earns enough to pay them back;
• suddenly, Joe has an injury and cannot work anymore. He has to give up his job and now can’t afford to pay the credit card company back;
• Joe ignores various letters chasing the debt and hopes the problem will disappear. Ultimately, after months, the credit card company gives up and sells Joe’s debt to a debt collection agency.  

So, in summary – after the debt sale, Joe now owes money to a different company. 

In practice, debt assignments can be complex, and the parties must follow the relevant legal rules and draft the correct documentation.

An assignment of debt essentially transfers the debt from one party (the assignor) to a third party (an assignee). 

In practice, this will mean the original debtor (e.g. Joe Bloggs) will now owe the debt to a new third-party creditor (e.g. the debt collection business). Therefore, in the scenario above, Joe must now repay the debt to the third-party debt collection business.

This process can be complex. There have been several legal cases in the courts where this process has given rise to disputes.

To avoid lengthy and expensive disputes, it’s important to have up-to-date legal contracts in place. Our contract lawyers can review and update your contracts to ensure your business is protected. Book a complimentary consultation today by filling out the form on this page.

There are two different types of assignment of debt – a legal assignment of debt and an equitable assignment of debt. 

In simple terms:

• a legal assignment of debt will transfer the right for enforcement of the debt; and
• an equitable assignment of debt will transfer only the benefit of the debt without the right to enforce it. 

Let us explore each type below.

Legal Assignment of Debt 

If the assignment complies with specific legal requirements under the Law of Property Act 1925, it will be a ‘legal assignment’. This means that the assignee will be the new owner of the debt. 

A legal assignment requires various formalities to be effective. For example, it must:

• be in writing and signed by the assignor;
• the debtor must be given written notice of the assignment;
• be absolute with no conditions attached to it;
• relate to the whole of the debt and not just part of it; and
• not be a charge.

After the transfer of the debt, the assignor can sue the debtor in its own name. 

Equitable Assignment of Debt

It is also possible to have an equitable debt transfer – the requirements for this are much less strict. For example, this can be done informally by the assignor informing the assignee that the rights are transferred to them. 

Download this free Commercial Contracts Checklist to ensure your contracts will meet your business’ needs.

For an equitable assignment, giving notice is not essential, but still always highly advisable. 

Where an equitable assignment is made, the assignee won’t have the right to pursue court action for the debt. In this case, the assignee will have to join forces with the assignor to sue for the debt to sue for the debt. 

The debtor should receive notice of any debt transfer so they know to whom the money is owed. Following notice, the new debt owner can pursue the debt owed. 

A legal assignment is the best option for an assignee of debt – this will give them full rights to enforce the debt. 

Assignments of debts can be very complex. For a legal assignment of debt, you need to follow various formalities. Otherwise, it may be unenforceable and lead to disputes. If you need help executing a debt assignment correctly, you should seek legal advice from an experienced lawyer.

If you need help with an assignment of debt, LegalVision’s experienced business lawyers can assist as part of our LegalVision membership. You will have unlimited access to lawyers to answer your questions and draft and review your documents for a low monthly fee. Call us today on 0808 196 8584 or visit our membership page .

We appreciate your feedback – your submission has been successfully received.

Register for our free webinars

Hiring top talent: legal strategies for small businesses, how founders can succeed in the startup ecosystem, resolving commercial disputes without going to court, navigating commercial property disputes: resolving common conflicts , contact us now.

Fill out the form and we will contact you within one business day

Related articles

3 Key Considerations to Manage Contract Risks

3 Business Benefits of Working With a Specialist Commercial Contracts Lawyer

 What Are the Risks of a Verbal Contract With Your Customers?

3 Points Your Business Should Consider to Minimise Risk Before Signing a New Contract

We’re an award-winning law firm

2024 Law Company of the Year Finalist - The Lawyer Awards

2024 Law Firm of the Year Finalist - Modern Law Private Client Awards

2023 Economic Innovator of the Year Finalist - The Spectator

2023 Law Company of the Year Finalist - The Lawyer Awards

2023 Future of Legal Services Innovation - Legal Innovation Awards

• Search Search Please fill out this field.
• Corporate Finance
• Corporate Debt

Assignment of Accounts Receivable: Meaning, Considerations

Adam Hayes, Ph.D., CFA, is a financial writer with 15+ years Wall Street experience as a derivatives trader. Besides his extensive derivative trading expertise, Adam is an expert in economics and behavioral finance. Adam received his master's in economics from The New School for Social Research and his Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in sociology. He is a CFA charterholder as well as holding FINRA Series 7, 55 & 63 licenses. He currently researches and teaches economic sociology and the social studies of finance at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem.

Charlene Rhinehart is a CPA , CFE, chair of an Illinois CPA Society committee, and has a degree in accounting and finance from DePaul University.

Investopedia / Jiaqi Zhou

What Is Assignment of Accounts Receivable?

Assignment of accounts receivable is a lending agreement whereby the borrower assigns accounts receivable to the lending institution. In exchange for this assignment of accounts receivable, the borrower receives a loan for a percentage, which could be as high as 100%, of the accounts receivable.

The borrower pays interest, a service charge on the loan, and the assigned receivables serve as collateral. If the borrower fails to repay the loan, the agreement allows the lender to collect the assigned receivables.

Key Takeaways

• Assignment of accounts receivable is a method of debt financing whereby the lender takes over the borrowing company's receivables.
• This form of alternative financing is often seen as less desirable, as it can be quite costly to the borrower, with APRs as high as 100% annualized.
• Usually, new and rapidly growing firms or those that cannot find traditional financing elsewhere will seek this method.
• Accounts receivable are considered to be liquid assets.
• If a borrower doesn't repay their loan, the assignment of accounts agreement protects the lender.

Understanding Assignment of Accounts Receivable

With an assignment of accounts receivable, the borrower retains ownership of the assigned receivables and therefore retains the risk that some accounts receivable will not be repaid. In this case, the lending institution may demand payment directly from the borrower. This arrangement is called an "assignment of accounts receivable with recourse." Assignment of accounts receivable should not be confused with pledging or with accounts receivable financing .

An assignment of accounts receivable has been typically more expensive than other forms of borrowing. Often, companies that use it are unable to obtain less costly options. Sometimes it is used by companies that are growing rapidly or otherwise have too little cash on hand to fund their operations.

New startups in Fintech, like C2FO, are addressing this segment of the supply chain finance by creating marketplaces for account receivables. Liduidx is another Fintech company providing solutions through digitization of this process and connecting funding providers.

Financiers may be willing to structure accounts receivable financing agreements in different ways with various potential provisions.​

Special Considerations

Accounts receivable (AR, or simply "receivables") refer to a firm's outstanding balances of invoices billed to customers that haven't been paid yet. Accounts receivables are reported on a company’s balance sheet as an asset, usually a current asset with invoice payments due within one year.

Accounts receivable are considered to be a relatively liquid asset . As such, these funds due are of potential value for lenders and financiers. Some companies may see their accounts receivable as a burden since they are expected to be paid but require collections and cannot be converted to cash immediately. As such, accounts receivable assignment may be attractive to certain firms.

The process of assignment of accounts receivable, along with other forms of financing, is often known as factoring, and the companies that focus on it may be called factoring companies. Factoring companies will usually focus substantially on the business of accounts receivable financing, but factoring, in general, a product of any financier.

• Terms of Service
• Editorial Policy
• Privacy Policy

• More Blog Popular
• Who's Who Legal
• Instruct Counsel
• My newsfeed
• Save & file
• View original
• Follow Please login to follow content.

add to folder:

• My saved (default)

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Find out more about Lexology or get in touch by visiting our About page.

Assignment of debts, statutory demands and offsetting claims

It is not uncommon for a creditor (assignor) to transfer their right to receive payment of a debt (assignment) to a third party (assignee). The assignee will then seek payment from the debtor.

The assignee of the debt can issue to the debtor company a statutory demand for the payment of the debt if the debt exceeds the statutory minimum, which is currently $2,500.

For the assignee issuing the statutory demand, there will be threshold issues as to whether notice of the assignment has been given to the debtor and whether appropriate details of the assignment are contained in the statutory demand.

Assignee has the same rights and obligations as the assignor

The assignee of the debt takes the assignment subject to the rights and obligations of the assignor.

This was demonstrated in the recent decision of Mascarene Pty Ltd v Slater [2016] VSC 395 relating to a building dispute.

In Mascarene a judgment debt was assigned and the assignee issued a statutory demand.

The Court held that the assignee was not prevented from seeking payment of interest as it had the same rights as the assignor, as if the assignment had not taken place.

However, the assignee also took the assignment subject to the obligations that would have applied to the assignor in respect of the debt.

In seeking to set aside the statutory demand the debtor company claimed it had an offsetting claim against the assignor for reinstatement costs relating to building works.

Although the assignee was not a party to the building contract and not personally liable for the reinstatement costs, the debtor company was successful in claiming the setoff and reducing the amount of the statutory demand by the amount of the reinstatement costs.

It is clear that an offsetting claim cannot be sidestepped by assigning the debt.

The assignee of a debt receives the benefit of the debt subject to the rights of the assignor but also subject to the assignor’s obligations in respect of the debt.

A statutory demand can be issued in respect of an assigned debt however the assignment does not prevent the debtor company from disputing the existence or amount of the alleged debt or seeking to raise an offsetting claim.

Filed under

• Company & Commercial
• Construction
• Cooper Grace Ward

Popular articles from this firm

Podcast: taxland with fletch and sarah - understanding the ato’s new guidance on section 99b applying to distributions of capital from trusts *, the right to disconnect: what does this mean for my workplace *, it depends - can a nominee holds shares in a company on my behalf *, it depends - we’ve separated, should i freeze the bank accounts *, it depends - when can i get a copy of someone else’s will *.

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected] .

Professional development

Charging Orders - Everything You Need to Know - Learn Live

Certificate in Debt Recovery & Enforcement

Legal Debt Recovery in Scotland - From Pre Sue Collection to Effective Judgment Enforcement

Setting Aside Statutory Demands & Injunctions to Restrain - A Toolkit for Insolvency Professionals - Learn Live

Corporate Finance Uncovered - Refresh Your Knowledge - Learn Live

Related practical resources PRO

• How-to guide How-to guide: Understanding the risk of negligence claims when using AI (USA) Recently updated
• How-to guide How-to guide: AI and smart contracts (USA) Recently updated
• How-to guide How-to guide: How to avoid liability for defective products in supply of goods agreements (USA)

Related research hubs

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; others help us improve the user experience. By using the site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Read our  privacy policy  to learn more.

• GAINS & LOSSES

Taxing the Transfer of Debts Between Debtors and Creditors

• C Corporation Income Taxation
• NOL & Other Tax Attributes
• Individual Income Taxation

T he frequent transfer of cash between closely held businesses and their owners is very common. If the owner works in the business, the transfer is likely to be either a salary to a shareholder/employee or a Sec. 707(c) guaranteed payment to a partner. Alternatively, the transfer may be a loan. As long as the true substance of the transaction is a loan, it will be respected for tax purposes. 1

The cash flow is not exclusively from the businesses to the owner. Many owners prefer to capitalize their closely held business with a combination of equity and debt. Once again, these loans will be respected and not reclassified as equity if they are bona fide loans.

In the normal course of business, these loans are repaid. The receipt of the repayment will be tax free except to the extent it is interest. However, in difficult economic conditions, many of these loans are not repaid. To the extent that the creditor cancels the obligation, the debtor has cancellation of debt (COD) income under Sec. 61(a)(12). This income is taxable unless the taxpayer qualifies for an exclusion under Sec. 108. In other cases, the debt is transferred between the parties either as an independent transaction or part of a larger one. This article reviews these transactions.

Two basic types of transfers have created significant tax issues. In the first, the debtor transfers the debt to the creditor. If the debtor is the owner of a business and the business is a creditor, the transfer appears to be a contribution. If the business is the debtor and the owner is the creditor, the transfer can be a distribution, liquidation, or reorganization. The other type of transfer is from the creditor to the debtor. Again, the transaction can take the form of a contribution if the creditor is the owner, or it can take the form of a distribution, liquidation, or reorganization if the creditor is the business.

Debtor-to-Creditor Transfers

Corporations.

The two seminal cases that established the framework for analyzing the transfer of a debt obligation from a debtor to a creditor are Kniffen 2 and Edwards Motor Transit Co. 3 Arthur Kniffen ran a sole proprietorship and owned a corporation. The sole proprietorship borrowed money from the corporation. For valid business reasons, Kniffen transferred the assets and liabili ties of the proprietorship to the corporation in exchange for stock of the corporation, thereby transferring a debt from the debtor to the creditor. The transaction met the requirements of Sec. 351.

The government argued that the transfer of the debt to the creditor was in fact a discharge or cancellation of the debt (a single step), which should have been treated as the receipt of boot under Sec. 351(b) and taxed currently. The taxpayer argued that the transfer was an assumption of the debt and, based on Sec. 357(a), should not be treated as boot.

The Tax Court acknowledged that the debt was canceled by operation of law. However, it did not accept the government’s argument as to the structure of the transaction. Instead, it determined that two separate steps occurred. First, the corporation assumed the debt. This assumption was covered by Sec. 357(a). After the assumption, the interests of the debtor and creditor merged and the debt was extinguished. Since the transfer was not for tax avoidance purposes, Sec. 357(b) did not apply. The result was a tax-free Sec. 351 transaction, except to the extent that the assumed debt exceeded the bases of the assets transferred, resulting in gain under Sec. 357(c). This decision established the separation of the debt transfer from its extinguishment.

Edwards Motor Transit Co. cites, and is considered to have adopted, the approach in Kniffen . For valid business reasons, the owners of Edwards created The Susquehanna Co., a holding company, and transferred Edwards’ stock to it under Sec. 351. Susquehanna borrowed money from Edwards to meet certain financial obligations. To eliminate problems that arose from having a holding company owning the stock of an operating company, the owners merged Susquehanna into Edwards under Sec. 368(a)(1)(A). The government acknowledged that the basic transaction was a nontaxable merger. However, the government wanted the company to recognize income as a result of the cancellation or forgiveness of the debt. The Tax Court ruled for the taxpayer, on the grounds that the debt transfer (from debtor to creditor) was not a cancellation of the debt. The ruling cited Kniffen as authority for this conclusion.

On its surface, Edwards Motor Transit affirmed the decision and reasoning in Kniffen . The Tax Court stated, “The transfer by the parent corporation of its assets to Edwards [its subsidiary] . . . constituted payment of the outstanding liabilities . . . just as surely as if Susquehanna had made payment in cash.” This statement relied on both Kniffen and Estate of Gilmore. 4 In Gilmore , a liquidating corporation transferred a receivable to its shareholder who happened to be the debtor. In that case, the court ruled the transaction was an asset transfer and not a forgiveness of debt. The court based its conclusion in large part on the fact that no actual cancellation of the debt occurred.

The statement in Edwards Motor Transit quoted above, however, is inapposite to the conclusion in Kniffen . A payment is not a transfer and assumption of a liability. Since Susquehanna was deemed to have used assets to repay the debt, the Tax Court should have required Susquehanna to recognize gain to the extent that the value of the assets used to repay the debt exceeded their bases. The conclusions in Kniffen and Edwards are consistent only in their holdings that these debt transfers were not cancellations of debts that would result in COD income. In Kniffen, the court ruled that the debt was assumed and then extinguished. In Edwards, the court ruled that the extinguishment of the debt constituted repayment.

It is possible that the Tax Court reached the correct outcome in Edwards Motor Transit but for the wrong reason. In Rev. Rul 72-464, 5 a debtor corporation merged into the creditor corporation in a tax-free A reorganization under Sec. 368(a)(1)(A). The ruling concluded that the debtor corporation did not recognize any gain or loss on the extinguishment of the debt within the acquiring corporation. General Counsel Memorandum (GCM) 34902 6 provided the detailed analysis behind the conclusion.

The GCM cited both Kniffen and Edwards 7 and adopted their underlying rationale. Specifically, it concluded that the basic transaction (the reorganization) results in a transfer of the debt to the acquiring corporation. It is after the transfer that the debt is extinguished by the statutory merger of interests. The transfer is an assumption of debt, which is nontaxable under Sec. 357(a). Therefore, the transferor (debtor corporation) recognizes no gain or loss.

This is exactly what happened in Ed wards . The debt was assumed, not repaid. Therefore, the Tax Court should have reached the conclusion that the transaction was nontaxable under Sec. 357(a) and not have relied on the questionable authority of Estate of Gilmore 8 or concluded that the debt was repaid.

Liquidations

The transactions discussed up to this point have been either tax-free corporate formations (Sec. 351) or tax-free reorganizations (Sec. 361). In a different transaction that is likely to occur, the creditor/shareholder liquidates the debtor corporation.

If the transaction is not between a parent and its subsidiary, taxability is determined by Secs. 331 and 336. Prior to 1986, the outcome might have been determined by Kniffen and Edwards . With the repeal that year of the General Utilities 9 doctrine (tax-free corporate property distributions) and the enactment of current Sec. 336, the outcome is straightforward. Under Sec. 336, the debtor corporation that is liquidated recognizes its gains and losses. Whether the liquidated corporation is treated as using assets to satisfy a debt requiring the recognition of gain or is treated as distributing assets in a taxable transaction under Sec. 336, all the gains and losses are recognized.

The taxation of the shareholder is a little more complex. First, the shareholder must determine how much it received in exchange for the stock. The most reasonable answer is that the shareholder received the value of the assets minus any debt assumed and minus the face amount of the debt owed to it by the liquidated corporation. This amount is used to determine the gain or loss that results from the hypothetical sale of stock under Sec. 331. Second, the shareholder must determine what was received for the debt, whether assets or the debt itself. The amount received in payment of the liquidated corporation’s debt is a nontaxable return of capital. If the shareholder is deemed to have received the debt itself, then the debt is merged out of existence. The basis of all the assets received should be their fair market value (FMV) under either Sec. 334(a) or general basis rules.

If the liquidated corporation is a subsidiary of the creditor/shareholder, the results change. Under Sec. 337, a subsidiary recognizes neither gain nor loss on the transfer of its assets in liquidation to an 80% distributee (parent). Sec. 337(b) expands this rule to include distributions in payment of debts owed to the parent corporation. Therefore, the subsidiary/debtor does not recognize any gain or loss.

The parent corporation (creditor) recognizes no gain or loss on the liquidation of its subsidiary under Sec. 332. The basis of the transferred property in the hands of the parent is carryover basis. 10 This carry­over basis rule also applies to property received as payment of debt if the subsidiary does not recognize gain or loss on the repayment. 11 In other words, the gain or loss is postponed until the assets are disposed of by the parent corporation.

One important exception to the nonrecognition rule is applied to the parent corporation. Under Regs. Sec. 1.332-7, if the parent’s basis in the debt is different from the face amount of the debt, the parent recognizes the realized gain or loss (face amount minus basis) that results from the repayment. Since this regulation does not mention any exception to the rules of Sec. 334(b)(1), the parent corporation is required to use carryover basis for all the assets received without adjustment for any gain or loss recognized on the debt.

This discussion of liquidations assumes that the liquidated corporation is solvent. If it is insolvent, the answer changes. The transaction cannot qualify under Secs. 332 and 337. The shareholder is not treated as receiving any property in exchange for stock; therefore, a loss is allowed under Sec. 165(g). The taxation of the debt depends on the amount, if any, received by the shareholder as a result of the debt.

Partnerships

The taxation of debt transfers involving partnerships is determined, in large part, by Secs. 731, 752, and 707(a)(2)(B). Specifically, the taxation of transfers by debtor partners to the creditor/partnership is determined by the disguised sale rules of Sec. 707(a)(2)(B), whereas transfers by debtor partnerships to a creditor/partner fall under Secs. 731 and 752.

Sec. 707(a)(2)(B) provides that a transfer of property by a partner to a partnership and a related transfer of cash or property to the partner is treated as a sale of property. The regulations specify the extent to which the partnership’s assumption of liabilities from the partner is treated as the distribution of the sale price.

Regs. Sec. 1.707-5 divides assumed liabilities into either qualified liabilities or unqualified liabilities. A qualified liability 12 is one that:

• Was incurred more than two years before the assumption;
• Was incurred within two years of the assumption, but was not incurred in anticipation of the assumption;
• Was allocated to a capital expenditure related to the property transferred to the partnership under Temp. Regs. Sec. 1.163-8T; or
• Was incurred in the ordinary course of business in which it was used, but only if all the material assets of that trade or business are transferred to the partnership.

The amount of qualified recourse liabilities is limited to the FMV of the transferred property reduced by senior liabilities. Any additional recourse liabilities are treated as nonqualified debt.

If a transfer of property is not otherwise treated as part of a sale, the partnership’s assumption of a qualified liability in connection with a transfer of property is not treated as part of a sale. The assumption of nonqualified liabilities is treated as sale proceeds to the extent that the assumed liability exceeds the transferring partner’s share of that liability (as determined under Sec. 752) immediately after the partnership assumes the liability. If no money or other consideration is transferred to the partner by the partnership in the transaction, the assumption of qualified liabilities in a transaction treated as a sale is also treated as sales proceeds to the extent of the transferring partner’s share of that liability immediately after the partnership assumes the liability. 13 Following the assumption of the liability, the interests of the debtor and creditor merge, thereby extinguishing the debt. The result is that generally the full amount of these assumed liabilities are part of the sale proceeds. 14

The assumed liabilities that are not treated as sale proceeds still fall under Sec. 752. Since the transaction results in a reduction of the transferor’s personal liabilities, the taxpayer is deemed to have received a cash distribution equal to the amount of the debt assumed under Sec. 752(b). Given that the debt is immediately extinguished, no amount is allocated to any partner. The end result is that the transferor must recognize gain if the liability transferred exceeds the transferor’s outside basis before the transaction, increased by the basis of any asset transferred to the partnership as part of the transaction.

A partnership may have borrowed money from a partner and then engaged in a transaction that transfers the debt to the creditor/partner. The first question is whether the initial transaction is a loan or capital contribution. Sec. 707(a) permits loans by partners to partnerships. The evaluation of the transaction is similar to one to determine whether a shareholder has loaned money to a corporation or made a capital contribution. The factors laid out in Sec. 385 and Notice 94-47 15 should be considered in this analysis.

Assuming the debt is real and it alone is transferred to the creditor/partner, the outcome is straightforward. The partner is treated as having made a cash contribution to the partnership under Sec. 752(a) to the extent that the amount of debt exceeds the amount allocated to the partner under the Sec. 752 regulations. If part of the debt is allocated to other partners, these other partners are treated as receiving a deemed cash distribution.

If the transfer is part of a larger transaction, then the analysis is a little more complex. The transfer of the other assets is governed by Secs. 737, 731, and 751. Sec. 737 requires a partner to recognize gain if, during the prior seven years, the partner had contributed property with built-in gain to the partnership and the current FMV of the distributed property exceeds the partner’s outside basis. The partner is treated as recognizing gain in an amount equal to the lesser of (1) the excess (if any) of the FMV of property (other than money) received in the distribution over the adjusted basis of such partner’s interest in the partnership immediately before the distribution reduced (but not below zero) by the amount of money received in the distribution, or (2) the net precontribution gain of the partner. The outside basis is increased by the amount of the deemed contribution because the partner assumed a partnership liability. After any gain under Sec. 737 is determined, the general distribution rules of Secs. 731 and 751(b) apply to the transaction. In effect, the transfer to a creditor/partner of a partnership debt owed to the partner is treated the same as any liability assumed by the partner. The extinguishment of the debt should not result in additional tax consequences.

Creditor-to-Debtor Transfers

In addition to debtor-to-creditor transfers, there are creditor-to-debtor transfers. The outcome of these transactions is determined by the two-step analysis in Kniffen . The creditor is treated as having transferred an asset to the debtor/owner. After the transfer, the interests of the debtor and creditor merge, resulting in the extinguishment of the debt. This extinguishment is generally nontaxable since the basis of the debt and the face amount are equal. 16 The result changes if the basis in the hands of the creditor and the adjusted issue price of the debtor are not equal. 17

One of the initial pieces of guidance that addressed this question was Rev. Rul. 72-464. 18 In this ruling, the debt was transferred in a nontaxable transaction. Consequently, the recipient (the debtor) had a carryover basis in the debt. Since this basis was less than the face amount, gain equal to the difference was recognized. This ruling did not explain the reasoning behind the gain recognition or the potential impact if the value of the debt was different from its basis. 19 These items were addressed in Rev. Rul. 93-7. 20

Rev. Rul. 93-7 analyzed a transaction between a partnership and a partner, here designated P and A , respectively. A was a 50% partner. This percentage allowed A to not be a related party to P under Sec. 707(b). P also had no Sec. 751 assets, and A had no share of P ’s liabilities under Sec. 752. These were excluded because they did not affect the reasoning behind the taxation of debt transfers. A issued a debt with a face amount of $100 for $100. P acquired the debt for $100. When the debt was worth $90, it was distributed to A in complete redemption of its interest, which had an FMV of $90 and outside basis of $25. In other words, a creditor/partnership distributed debt to the debtor/partner.

The debt was an asset, a receivable, in the hands of P . When it was distributed to A , P determined its taxation under Sec. 731(b), which provides that no gain or loss is recognized by a partnership on the distribution of property. The application of Sec. 731(b) in this transaction followed directly from Kniffen , which treated the transfer of a debt as a separate transaction from any extinguishment that follows the transfer. Under Sec. 732, A ’s basis in the transferred debt was $25. 21

The basis rules of Sec. 732 assume that a built-in gain or loss on distributed property is realized and recognized when the recipient disposes of the property. In this situation, the distributed debt was extinguished, and therefore no future event would generate taxable gain or loss. Consequently, this extinguishment became a taxable event. In this specific case, A recognized gain of $65 ($90 FMV – $25 basis) and COD income of $10 ($100 face − $90 FMV.) The ruling did not spell out the reasoning for the recognition of both gain and COD income. It is the correct outcome based on Regs. Sec. 1.1001-2. Under that regulation, when property is used to satisfy a recourse obligation, the debtor has gain equal to the difference between the value of the property and its basis, and COD income equal to the difference between the amount of debt and the value of the property used as settlement. The distributed debt is property at the time of the distribution, and the rules of Regs. Sec. 1.1001-2 should apply.

In Rev. Rul. 93-7, the value of the debt was less than the face amount. A debt’s value could exceed its face amount. In that case, the revenue ruling indicated, a deduction for the excess value may be available to the partner as a result of the deemed merger. In Letter Ruling 201105016, 22 the IRS ruled that a taxpayer was entitled to a deduction when it reacquired its debt at a premium as part of a restructuring plan. Rev. Rul. 93-7 cited Regs. Sec. 1.163-4(c)(1), and Letter Ruling 201105016 cited Regs. Sec. 1.163-7(c). Both regulations state that the reacquisition of debt at a premium results in deductible interest expense equal to the repurchase amount minus the adjusted issue price. Regs. Sec. 1.163-4(c)(1) applies to corporate taxpayers, while Regs. Sec. 1.163-7(c) expanded this treatment to all taxpayers. Based on these regulations and the treatment of the distribution as an acquisition of a debt, an interest expense deduction should be permitted when the value exceeds the amount of debt, whereas COD income is recognized when the value is less than the amount of the debt.

In Rev. Rul. 93-7, the partnership was the creditor, and the debt was transferred to a debtor/partner. The reverse transaction can occur, in which a creditor/partner transfers debt to the debtor/partnership in exchange for a capital or profits interest. Sec. 721 applies to the creditor/partner. Therefore, no gain or loss is recognized. However, Sec. 108(e)(8)(B) applies to the debtor/partnership. Sec. 108(e)(8)(B) provides that the partnership recognizes COD income equal to the excess of the debt canceled over the value of the interest received by the creditor. This income is allocated to the partners that owned interests immediately before the transfer. The partnership does not recognize gain or loss (other than the COD income) as a result of this transaction. 23 The value of the interest generally is determined by the liquidation value of the interest received. 24 If the creditor receives a profits interest, the liquidation value is zero, and therefore the partnership recognizes COD income equal to the amount of debt transferred.

Corporate Transactions

Debt transfers between corporations and shareholders are just as likely as transfers between partners and partnerships. If the transferor is a shareholder or becomes a shareholder as a result of the transaction, Secs. 1032, 118, and 351 provide basic nontaxability. However, Sec. 108 overrules these sections in certain cases.

If the shareholder transfers the debt to the corporation as a contribution to capital, Sec. 108(e)(6) may result in the recognition of COD income by the corporation. Under Sec. 108(e)(6), the corporation is treated as having satisfied the indebtedness with an amount of money equal to the shareholder’s adjusted basis in the indebtedness. Therefore, the corporation has COD income amount equal to the excess of the face amount of the debt over the transferor’s basis in the debt immediately prior to the transfer. In most cases, the face and basis are equal, and no COD income is recognized. If the transfer is in exchange for stock, Sec. 108(e)(8)(A) provides that the corporation is treated as having satisfied the indebtedness with an amount of money equal to the FMV of the stock. Therefore, the corporation recognizes COD income equal to the excess of the face value of the debt over the value of the stock received. In many cases, the value of the stock is less than the debt canceled, and therefore COD income is recognized. Sec. 351 provides that 80% creditor/shareholders recognize neither gain nor loss if the debt is evidenced by a security. If Sec. 351 does not apply, the creditor/shareholder may be able to claim a loss or bad-debt deduction.

Rev. Rul. 2004-79 25 provides a detailed analysis of the transfer of debt from a creditor corporation to a debtor shareholder. The analysis is similar to the one for partnership distributions covered by Rev. Rul. 93-7, discussed previously.

Modifying the facts of Rev. Rul. 2004-79, assume that a shareholder borrows money from his corporation. The face amount of the debt is $1,000, and the issue price is $920. The original issue discount (OID) of $80 is amortized by both the corporation and the shareholder. At a time when the adjusted issue price and basis are $950 but the FMV is only $925, the corporation distributes the debt to the shareholder as a dividend.

From the corporation’s point of view, this is a property dividend. Rev. Rul. 2004- 79 cites Rev. Rul. 93-7, but it could just as easily have cited Kniffen . As a property dividend, the transaction’s taxa tion to the corporation is governed by Sec. 311. Since the value in the revenue ruling was less than the basis, the corporation recognized no gain or loss. If the value had appreciated, the corporation would have recognized gain equal to the appreciation.

The shareholder receives a taxable dividend equal to the value of the debt; consequently, the debt has a basis equal to its FMV of $925. Since the debt is automatically extinguished, the shareholder is treated as having satisfied an obligation in the amount of $950 with a payment of $925. Therefore, the shareholder must recognize $25 of COD income.

A second fact pattern in the revenue ruling is the same, except the value of the distributed debt is $1,005. Under these facts, the shareholder would be entitled to an interest expense deduction under Regs. Sec. 1.163-4 or 1.163-7 in the amount of $55 ($1,005 − $950). In other words, the shareholder is deemed to have reacquired its own debt for a payment equal to the basis that the distributed debt obtains in the transaction.

The conclusions of Rev. Rul. 2004-79 are consistent with those in Rev. Rul. 93-7. They follow the reasoning of Kniffen .

Another transaction that could occur involving shareholder debt is a liquidation of the corporation, resulting in a distribution of the debt to the debtor/shareholder. The results should be similar to those in Rev. Rul. 2004-79. The corporation that distributes the debt is taxed under Sec. 336. Therefore, the corporation recognizes gain or loss depending on the basis of the debt and its FMV. This is the same result as in the dividend case, except that the loss is recognized under Sec. 336 instead of being denied under Sec. 311. The shareholder’s basis in the debt is its FMV under Sec. 334(a). The shareholder recognizes COD income or interest expense, depending on whether the basis is less than or greater than the adjusted issue price of the debt. These results flow from the regulations under Secs. 61 and 163 and are consistent with the conclusions in the above revenue rulings.

The results change slightly if the liquidation qualifies under Secs. 332 and 337. The IRS discussed these results in Chief Counsel Advice 200040009. 26 Sec. 332 shields the parent from recognition of income on the receipt of the debt. Sec. 337 shields the liquidating corporation from recognizing gain or loss on the transfer of the debt to its parent corporation. The basis is carryover basis under Sec. 334(b). Then, because the debt is extinguished, the parent recognizes either COD income or interest expense on the extinguishment of the debt. As in the prior revenue rulings and Kniffen , the extinguishment has to be a taxable event because the elimination of the carryover basis prevents the parent corporation from having a taxable transaction in the future involving this debt. These results are consistent with prior decisions.

The results discussed for a parent/subsidiary liquidation should also apply if the debtor/corporation acquires a corporation that owns its debt in a nontaxable asset reorganization. In this case, Sec. 361 replaces Secs. 332 and 337. The extinguishment of the debt is a separate transaction that should result in recognition of income or expense.

Acquired Debt

So far, this article has discussed transactions between the debtor and creditor. Now it turns to how the holder of the debt acquired it. In many cases, the holder acquired the debt directly from the debtor, and the acquisition is nontaxable. In other situations, the debt is outstanding and in the hands of an unrelated party. The holder acquires the debt from this unrelated party. In these cases, Sec. 108(e)(4) may create COD income.

Under Sec. 61, if a debtor reacquires its debt for less than its adjusted issue price, the debtor has COD income. Sec. 108(e)(4) expands on this rule: If a party related to the debtor acquires the debt, the debtor is treated as acquiring the debt, with the resulting COD income recognized. Related parties are defined in Secs. 267(b) and 707(b)(1).

The regulations provide that the acquisition can be either direct or indirect. A direct acquisition is one by a person related to the debtor at the time the debt is acquired. 27 An indirect acquisition occurs when the debtor acquires the holder of the debt instrument, where the holder of the debt acquired it in anticipation of becoming related to the debtor. 28 The determination of whether the holder acquired the debt in anticipation of becoming related is based on all the facts and circumstances. 29 However, if the holder acquires the debt within six months before the holder becomes related to the debtor, the acquisition by the holder is deemed to be in anticipation of becoming related to the debtor. 30

In the case of a direct acquisition, the amount of COD income is equal to the adjusted issue price minus the basis of the debt in the hands of the related party. In the case of indirect acquisitions, the calculation depends on whether the debt is acquired within six months of being acquired. 31 If the holder acquired the debt within six months of being acquired, the COD income is calculated as if it were a direct acquisition. If the holder acquired the debt more than six months before being acquired, the COD income is equal to the adjusted issue price minus the FMV of the debt instrument on the date that the holder is acquired.

When a debtor reacquires its own debt, in addition to reporting COD income, the debtor has the debt extinguished as a result of the merger of interests. When a related party acquires the debt, the debtor has COD income, but the debt remains outstanding. In these cases, the debtor is treated as issuing a new debt instrument immediately following the recognition of the COD income for an amount equal to the amount used to calculate the COD income (adjusted basis or FMV 32 ). If this issue price is less than the stated redemption price at maturity of the debt (as defined in Sec. 1273(a)(2), the difference is OID that is subject to the amortization rules of Sec. 1272.

Rev. Rul. 2004-79 provides a simple example of this transaction. In the ruling, a parent corporation, P , issued $10 million of debt for $10 million. After issuance, S , a subsidiary of P , purchased the debt for $9.5 million. Under Regs. Sec. 1.108-2(f), P had to recognize $500,000 of COD income ($10 million face − $9.5 million basis to S ). After this recognition, P was treated as having issued the debt to S for $9.5 million. Therefore, $500,000 of OID was amortizable by P and S . If S later transfers the debt to P , the previously discussed rules determine the taxation of the transfer using S ’s basis ($9.5 million + amortized OID).

Secs. 61 and 108(e)(4) apply only if the debt is acquired for less than the adjusted issue price. If the acquisition price is greater than the adjusted issue price, the acquiring party treats this excess as premium and amortizes it, thereby reducing the amount of interest income recognized by the holder.

Installment Obligations

An installment obligation differs from other obligations in that the holder recognizes income when cash is collected in payment of the obligation. The rules describing the taxation of installment obligations were rewritten as part of the Installment Sales Revision Act of 1980, P.L. 96-471. Under old Sec. 453(d) (new Sec. 453B(a)), if the holder of an installment obligation distributes, transmits, or disposes of the obligation, the taxpayer is required to recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between the basis in the obligation and the FMV of the obligation. There is an exception to this rule for distributions in liquidation of a subsidiary that are exempt from taxation under Sec. 337.

Prior to the Code revision, the regulations permitted the transfer of installment obligations without gain recognition if the transaction was covered by either Sec. 721 or 351. 33 Although the regulations have not been revised for the Code change, the IRS continues to treat Secs. 721 and 351 as overriding the gain recognition provision. 34

If the transaction results in transfer of the obligation either from the creditor to the debtor or from the debtor to the creditor, the tax result changes. The seminal case is Jack Ammann Photogrammetric Engineers, Inc. 35 In it, the taxpayer created a corporation to which he contributed $100,000 in return for 78% of the corporation’s stock. He then sold his photogrammetry business to the corporation for $817,031. He received $100,000 cash and a note for $717,031. He reported the sale under the installment method. When he was still owed $540,223 on the note, he transferred it to the corporation for stock of the corporation worth $540,223. He reported this as a disposition under Sec. 453(d) and recognized the deferred gain. Later, he filed a claim for refund, arguing that Sec. 351 prevented recognition of the deferred gain. After allowing the refund, the IRS assessed a deficiency against the corporation, arguing that the corporation came under Sec. 453(d). The corporation argued that, under Sec. 1032, it was not taxable. The Tax Court ruled for the IRS.

The Fifth Circuit reversed the decision. The underlying reasoning was that the disposition by the shareholder and the extinguishment of the debt in the hands of the corporation were separate transactions. The extinguishment did not fall under Sec. 453(d). The court indicated that the IRS should have assessed the tax against the shareholder.

Following this case, the IRS issued Rev. Rul. 73-423. 36 In this ruling, a shareholder transferred an installment obligation from Corporation X back to the corporation in a transaction described in Sec. 351. The ruling concluded that the transfer was a satisfaction of the installment agreement at other than face value under Sec. 453(d)(1)(A) and that the shareholder was required to recognize gain without regard to Sec. 351. The corporation had no gain or loss under Sec. 1032 and Ammann .

Sec. 453(d) is now Sec. 453B(a), and the rule has not changed. Therefore, if a creditor transfers an installment obligation to the debtor in an otherwise tax-free transaction, the obligation is treated as satisfied at other than its face value, and the creditor is required to recognize gain or loss as discussed in Rev. Rul. 73-423. 37

New Sec. 453B(f) covers transactions in which installment obligations become unenforceable. This section covers the extinguishment of an installment debt through a merger of the rights of a debtor and creditor. The Code treats these transactions as dispositions of the obligation with gain or loss recognized. When the debtor and creditor are related, the disposition is at FMV but no less than the face amount.

If the debtor of an installment obligation engages in a transaction in which the creditor assumes the debt, the results are consistent with those of transactions involving obligations other than installment notes. The debtor is deemed to have received cash equal to the amount of the debt. This is fully taxable unless exempted by Sec. 357, 721, or a similar provision. The creditor falls under Sec. 453B(f), with the extinguishment treated as a taxable disposition of the obligation for its FMV (which for related parties is no less than the face amount).

Business entities often incur debts to their owners, and, conversely, the owners incur liabilities to their business entities. In numerous transactions these obligations are canceled for consideration other than simple repayment of the debt. Based on Kniffen , these transactions are treated as a transfer of consideration followed by an extinguishment of the debt. If a shareholder’s debt to his or her controlled corporation is transferred to that corporation along with assets, the transaction may be tax free under Secs. 351 and 357(a). If a shareholder/creditor receives the related corporate debt in a distribution or liquidation, Sec. 311 or 336 determines the corporation’s taxation.

The cancellation of a partner’s debt to the partnership is generally governed by the distribution rules, including the constructive sale or compensation rules of Sec. 707(a)(2). When a partner cancels the partnership’s debt, the partner has made a contribution to capital. This can have consequences to all partners since the total liabilities are decreased and the partners’ bases are decreased under Sec. 752.

In most cases the merger of debtor and creditor interests is nontaxable. However, if the basis of the debt or receivable does not equal the face amount of the debt, income or loss is recognized. The exact amount and character of the income or loss depends on factors discussed in this article. It is important for the tax adviser to identify those cases in which the debt transfer is not tax free.

1 Invalid loans to shareholders have been reclassified as dividends.

2 Kniffen , 39 T.C. 553 (1962).

3 Edwards Motor Transit Co. , T.C. Memo. 1964-317.

4 Estate of Gilmore , 40 B.T.A. 945 (1939).

5 Rev. Rul. 72-464, 1972-2 C.B. 214.

6 GCM 34902 (6/8/72). The GCM also refers to Sec. 332, which will be dis cussed later.

7 As the GCM points out, by using Sec. 357(a), taxpayers could achieve the same outcome in C reorganizations.

8 See Chief Counsel Advice 200040009 (10/6/00), which suggests Estate of Gilmore ’s requirement of a formal cancellation of debt before COD income is recognized may no longer be valid.

9 General Utilities & Operating Co. v. Helvering , 296 U.S. 200 (1935).

10 Sec. 334(b)(1).

12 Regs. Sec. 1.707-5(a)(6).

13 If the partnership transfers money or other consideration in the transaction, the amount treated as sales proceeds may be limited under Regs. Sec. 1.707-5(a)(5)(i)(B).

14 Under Regs. Sec. 1.707-5(a)(3)(ii), a partner’s share of liabilities is reduced by liabilities assumed that are anticipated to be reduced. Based on Kniffen and Edwards , the reduction will be anticipated.

15 Notice 94-47, 1994-1 C.B. 357.

16 See, e.g., IRS Letter Ruling 8825048 (3/23/88).

17 The transaction that gives rise to the difference and the taxation that results are discussed later.

18 Rev. Rul. 72-464, 1972-2 C.B. 214. Although this is a debtor-to-creditor transfer, the result is the same.

19 See GCM 34902 (6/8/72).

20 Rev. Rul. 93-7, 1993-1 C.B. 125.

21 If the partnership makes a Sec. 754 election, the partnership has a Sec. 734 adjustment of $75 ($100 inside basis – $25 basis after distribution).

22 IRS Letter Ruling 201105016 (2/4/11).

23 Regs. Sec. 1.108-8, effective Nov. 17, 2011.

24 See the Regs. Sec. 1.108-8(b)(2) safe-harbor rule.

25 Rev. Rul. 2004-79, 2004-2 C.B. 106.

26 CCA 200040009 (10/6/00).

27 Regs. Sec. 1.108-2(b).

28 Regs. Sec. 1.108-2(c)(1).

29 Regs. Sec. 1.108-2(c)(2).

30 Regs. Sec. 1.108-2(c)(3).

31 Regs. Secs. 1.108-2(f)(1) and (2).

32 Regs. Sec. 1.108-2(g).

33 Regs. Sec. 1.453-9(c)(2).

34 See IRS Letter Rulings 8824044 (3/22/88) and 8425042 (3/19/84).

35 Jack Ammann Photogrammetric Engineers, Inc. , 341 F.2d 466 (5th Cir. 1965), rev’g 39 T.C. 500 (1962).

36 Rev. Rul. 73-423, 1973-2 C.B. 161.

37 Although this revenue ruling involved a corporation, the IRS believes the same rule applies to partnerships. Treasury is currently working on a revision of the regulations to clarify the results. See the preamble to Regs. Sec. 1.108-8, T.D. 9557 (11/17/11).

Recapture considerations for Inflation Reduction Act credits

Electing the unicap historic absorption ratio under the modified simplified production method, revisiting firpta and return-of-capital distributions, partners’ basis on the liquidation of an insolvent partnership, the bba’s ‘ceases-to-exist’ rule in partnership termination transactions.

TAX PRACTICE MANAGEMENT

To get through the rigors of tax season, CPAs depend on their tax preparation software. Here's how they rate the leading professional products.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS & PENSIONS

The 2022 act affected a wide array of retirement fund and pension plan provisions. This article highlights many of the most noteworthy ones, along with relevant IRS guidance and congressional plans for technical corrections.

• Free Debt Assessment
• Individual Voluntary Arrangement
• Debt Management Plan
• Debt Consolidation
• Private Parking Fines
• Council & Police Fines
• Convicted Driver Insurance
• Equity Release
• Secured Loans
• Customer Stories

• Free Debt Assessment Back
• Knowledge Base
• Customer Stories Back
• About Us Back
• Contact Us Back

Deed of Assignment of Debt – Everything You Need to Know

Scott Nelson

Debt Expert

Scott Nelson is a renowned debt expert who supports people in debt with debt management and debt solution resources.

Janine Marsh

Financial Expert

Janine is a financial expert who supports individuals with debt management, cost-saving resources, and navigating parking tickets.

Total amount of debt?

For free & impartial money advice you can visit MoneyHelper . We work with The Debt Advice Service who provide information about your options. This isn’t a full fact-find, some debt solutions may not be suitable in all circumstances, ongoing fees might apply & your credit rating may be affected.

For free & impartial money advice you can visit MoneyHelper . We work with The Debt Advice Service who provide information about your options. This isn’t a full fact-find, some debt solutions may not be suitable in all circumstances, ongoing fees might apply & your credit rating may be affected.

Are you facing a ‘deed of assignment of debt’? Are you worried about a debt collector knocking on your door?

You’re in the right place. Each month, over 170,000 people visit our site looking for guidance on debt issues, just like this one. 

In this article, we’ll explain:

•  What a ‘deed of assignment’ is
•  What it means for your debts
•  Different types of assignment
•  Why companies sell their debts
•  Ways to handle your debt situation

We know how scary it can be when debt collectors get involved; some of our team have faced similar situations. We’re here to help you understand your situation and make the best choices.

There are several debt solutions in the UK, choosing the right one for you could write off some of your unaffordable debt , but the wrong one may be expensive and drawn out.

Answer below to get started.

How much debt do you have?

This isn’t a full fact find. MoneyNerd doesn’t give advice. We work with The Debt Advice Service who provide information about your options.

Deed of Assignment of Debt – the basics

Being in debt is confusing enough as it is. And it can get even more complicated when you get a letter through the door from a company you may never have heard of demanding (often in quite a strongly-worded way) that you make your payments to them instead.

What’s going on, you might ask yourself?

At the end of the day, the creditor will want the money that you owe back.

However, sometimes when an account falls into arrears , they won’t have the capabilities or resources to claim it back . This is when the original company you owe money might ‘ assign’ your debt . 

What is a Deed of Assignment of Debt?

This is notice that tells you that you now owe a debt collection agency or another collection service the money you originally owed to the creditor .

Instead of paying the company you might have originally owed money to, you now owe a third party company. 

A deed of assignment of debt is a legal documen t alerting you of the transfer of ownership of your debt to another person. The right to receive payment from the debt you owe is transferred over to this new party as well.

How a debt solution could help

Some debt solutions can:

• Stop nasty calls from creditors
• Freeze interest and charges
• Reduce your monthly payments

A few debt solutions can even  result in writing off some of your debt.

Here’s an example:

Monthly debt repayments

£429 reduction in monthly payments

If you want to  learn what debt solutions are available to you,  click the button below to get started.

What does it mean?

A deed of assignment of debt is used to transfer or sell the right to recover a debt .

Without a deed of assignment of debt, the two companies are not able to do this – you need a written transfer document. 

Once the transfer document, or deed of assignment of debt, has been signed by the assignee (the party transferring the debt) and the party receiving the debt ( assignor ), they must give notice to the debtor (the person that owes the company the sum of money).

Notice must be given within 7 days of assigning the debt. Unless someone gives notice to the debtor, then the new owner of the debt can’t enforce the debt by suing in court.

Is there more than one type of assignment? 

Confusingly, there are actually two different sorts of assignment that a creditor can make. These are Legal and Equitable.

Both types of assignment fall under the Law of Property Act 1925 , and both require the creditor to inform you of the change in writing – this is known as a notice of assignment of debt .

1. Legal Assignment

Legal assignment of debt gives the company who are purchasing the debt the power to enforce it .

Basically it means that you make payments to this company instead of the original creditor, and they can send you letters and make calls to your home.

2. Equitable

If a debt is an equitable assignment, only the amount you owe is transferred , and the original creditor will still retain the original rights and responsibilities .

The purchasing company will not be able to enforce the debt either.

Thousands have already tackled their debt

Every day our partners, The Debt Advice Service, help people find out whether they can lower their repayments and finally tackle or write off some of their debt.

I’d recommend this firm to anyone struggling with debt – my mind has been put to rest, all is getting sorted.

Reviews shown are for The Debt Advice Service.

Why do companies sell their debts?

A deed of assignment of debt can be a real headache, as you now have another layer of money owed. You will probably rightly ask yourself – why? And how can they sell it?

It may seem strange and confusing, but it’s actually completely legal for them to sell your debt . When you sign a credit agreement, there is almost always a clause in fine print that states that the original creditor has the power to assign their rights to a third party.

As you have signed this agreement, they don’t actually need to ask for your permission to assign your debt.

This also means that you cannot dispute it or make a complaint about it either. The only exception to this rule is if you have given evidence of mental health issues .

» TAKE ACTION NOW:  Fill out the short debt form

What are the next steps?

So that’s the basics about a Deed of Assignment of Debt. But what does this mean for you? 

If your creditor passes one of your debts onto a third party company or debt collection agency, it will be officially noted that this new company is now responsible for collection .

You will be able to see this change on your credit report , and any defaults will also be registered in their name too. 

While it certainly adds another layer of confusion to proceedings and you may be unsure of what’s going on when you find out about a deed of assignment of debt, it can occasionally be a bit of a blessing in disguise. 

You may find it much easier dealing with the new company, as they could be more flexible when it comes to discussing interest and additional charges.

There is also the likelihood that these companies actually specialise in collecting debts , and so know how to approach you as the customer with more tact and delicacy than the original creditor.

Is there something missing? We’re all ears and eager to improve. Send us a message and let us know how we can make our article more useful for you.

You can email us directly at [email protected] to share your feedback.

• Construction
• Insolvency Law & Restructuring
• Commercial Litigation
• Debt Recovery
• Corporate and Commercial Lawyers
• Commercial Property Lawyer
• Intellectual Property Lawyers
• Business Migration Lawyers
• Defamation and Injurious Falsehood Lawyers
• Wills and Estate Lawyer
• Immigration Lawyer
• Conveyancing
• Compensation Claims
• Defamation Lawyers
• RCR Difference
• Partnerships & Succession

The Enforcement of Assigned Debts

In the realm of financial recoveries, the assignment of credit contracts in default is a well-established practice. Banks and financial institutions frequently assign defaulting credit card and personal loan accounts to debt collectors in an effort to streamline their cost-effective recovery processes. At RCR Lawyers, we recognize the importance of understanding the legal intricacies surrounding the assignment of debts, and we are here to provide you with valuable insights and guidance.

Assignment of Debts: The Legal Framework

Under the Property Law Act 1974 (Qld), specifically in Section 199, provisions are made for the assignment of debt at law. This allows for the transfer of debt ownership from the original credit provider (the assignor) to the new owner (the assignee). However, it’s crucial to note that this assignment must be absolute, and written notice must be given to the debtor. Importantly, the debtor’s consent is not a prerequisite for this assignment.

Once a debt is assigned, all rights and responsibilities vested in the original credit provider are now transferred to the new owner. This transfer grants the assignee the authority to collect on the debt as if they were the initial credit provider. This includes the ability to charge interest as per the original contract terms and to initiate legal proceedings to recover the debt.

The National Credit Code: A Comprehensive Framework

The National Credit Code, a crucial component of the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 (Cth), extensively addresses the assignment of debt. It outlines the responsibilities of all credit lenders, providing a comprehensive framework for debt assignment and recovery.

Debtor Confusion and Legal Challenges

For debtors, the collection of assigned debts can often lead to confusion. While written notice of the assignment is a requirement, this notice extends only to the last known address (or last provided address) of the debtor. Many debtors are not familiar with the concept of debt assignment and often have not scrutinized the details of their credit contracts. As a result, an assignee who initiates legal proceedings to recover an outstanding balance may encounter significant obstacles.

In legal matters related to assigned debts, the case of Clark v Gallop Reserve Pty Ltd [2016] QCA 146 serves as an illustrative example. In this case, the validity of the Westpac Bank Corporation’s Deed of Assignment was challenged, as it did not explicitly include the judgment debt in the description of the outstanding debt owed to Westpac.

Philip McMurdo JA, in his judgment, emphasized that the wording “Westpac assigns to the Transferee all of Westpac’s full, absolute and entire legal and beneficial interest, right and title in and to the Westpac Debt, the Westpac Finance Documents, and the Westpac Guarantees” was sufficient to encompass the judgment obtained by Westpac before assignment. This exemplifies the court’s acknowledgment of the validity of the debt assignment and the assignee’s right to enforce the judgment debt.

Enforcement Options for Assignees

Once a debt has been validly assigned (following the absolute written assignment and proper notice to the debtor’s last known residence), and there are no offsetting claims available to the debtor, the assignee is entitled to pursue legal steps to recover the outstanding debts. These enforcement options may include:

• Commencing legal proceedings
• Obtaining judgments
• Enforcing judgments through methods such as statutory demands, bankruptcy notices, creditors’ petitions, warrants for property seizure and sale, garnishee orders, and more.

The RCR Recovery Team possesses extensive knowledge of various enforcement methods applicable in all Australian jurisdictions, particularly in the recovery of assigned debts. We are also well-equipped to provide guidance on the assignment of debts and the obligations that arise once such assignments occur.

If you have any inquiries or require further information on this topic, please don’t hesitate to contact RCR Recoveries at 07 3009 8444. Our legal team is ready to assist you with any questions or concerns you may have regarding the assignment and recovery of debts, ensuring that you have the necessary support to navigate these complexities with confidence.

At RCR Lawyers, we are dedicated to empowering you with the knowledge and guidance you need to effectively manage and recover assigned debts while upholding the highest legal standards.

If you have any queries in relation to the above, please contact RCR Recoveries on (07) 3009 8444 . Alternatively, you can contact us online or email us at [email protected] . 

Share Article:

Discuss Your Case Today

You’ll get a no-fee, no-obligation 30 minute consult with a lawyer

Related Articles

Is reproducing building plans an infringement of copyright.

• The Supreme Court of Queensland answered this question in

Determining the value of security interests – a timely reminder on unfair preference claims

• The recent authority of Trenfield & Ors v HAG

Ipso Facto and Safe Harbour: Recent Changes

• The recent introduction of the safe harbour amendments to

Stay up to date with our latest articles

BRISBANE OFFICE

Level 15/270 Adelaide St, Brisbane City QLD 4000

Email:  [email protected]

Phone: 07 3009 8444

Fax:  07 3009 8499

SYDNEY  OFFICE

Level 35/International Tower One, 100 Barangaroo Avenue, Sydney NSW 2000

Email: [email protected]

Copyright © 2021. All Rights Reserved | Rostron Carlyle Rojas Lawyers

• Need Help? Get Support
• Login/Register

Deed of Assignment of Debt

Templates / Deed of Assignment of Debt

Our Deed of Assignment of Debt template:

• Assign a debt without the need for a solicitor
• A solicitor-drafted template for reliability
• Detailed guidance notes for easy drafting
• Our no-quibble money-back satisfaction guarantee
• Approximately 10 minutes drafting time required

--> "Saved a lot of time and expense by using Legalo. They provided an easily understood draft deed with easy to execute guidance notes. Will use their services again."

How Does It Work?

• 1. Download

Use our Deed of Assignment of Debt template in order to transfer (or sell) the right to recover a debt. To transfer a debt legally between parties, it is necessary to enter into a written transfer document. Once the transfer document has been signed by the Assignee (the party transferring the debt) and the Assignee (the party receiving the right to collect the debt), notice must be given to the debtor (the person or company that owes the money). You should give the notice within 7 days of assigning the debt. So we have included a template notice with the download. Unless you give the notice, the new owner of the debt won’t be able to enforce the debt by suing.

This template is for use whether:

• the debtor is an individual or a company ; and
• the creditor is an individual or a company .

If the debt is the result of a successful court case, then instead use our Deed of Assignment of a Judgment Debt .

For general information about what an assignment is, have a look at this Wikipedia entry .

How to Use our Deed of Assignment of Debt Template

The deed of Assignment of a debt is in template form. So you can edit it to your specific circumstances. You can download it in Microsoft Word. Once you have downloaded it, edit the template agreement to suit. Our guidance notes, which we include with the download, will make this easy for you.

An Assignment of Debt is a simple agreement. As a result, the drafting time you need to complete the document is minimal.

A UK solicitor, experienced in this area of the law, has drafted the template. Therefore, you get the peace of mind that you are using a suitably-drafted agreement. You have the added benefit of substantial savings on hiring a solicitor yourself.

Giving Notice of the Assignment

As we state above, it is important that someone gives notice of the assignment of the debt to the debtor. You should do this within 7 days of the assignment’s taking place. Either party to the deed of assignment of debt can give the notice to the debtor.

If you are the party receiving the assignment of the debt, then we recommend that you get the Assignor to sign the notice and send it to the debtor yourself. That way you can be certain that it gets there. So send it by “signed for” or “special delivery” post.

If you have any questions about the deed of assignment, then read our blog article , which may well answer them.

Guide to our Deed of Assignment of a Debt

We have drafted our template so that you simply need to replace the wording in the square brackets with wording that is appropriate to you. The remainder of this page is a preview of the key provisions of the guide. You receive the full guide with your purchase. The guide walks you through each clause in the template and explains what you need to add within the square brackets.

Clauses in this Deed of Assignment of a Debt

Party clauses – You will need to insert the names and addresses of party 1 (the Assignor) and party 2 (the Assignee). We have drafted the template on the assumption that the parties are companies. If either of parties 1 and 2 is not a company, then replace the wording for it as applicable using the format:

“[NAME] of [ADDRESS]”

(A) Add in the name of the party that owes the debt and amount of the debt.

Numbered clauses

1. interpretation.

 This clause defines the main terms used in the deed of assignment of debt and you do not need to add anything.

2. Assignment

This clause transfers the rights and benefit of the debt from the Assignor to the Assignee. If the Assignee is paying the Assignor for the debt, then set out the amount it is paying for the debt in clause 2.1. Traditionally this is at a significant discount to the full amount of the debt, on the basis that the Assignee is taking the risks that (a) it proves not to be recoverable in full or (b) expenses are incurred in making the recovery.

3. Warranties and Indemnity

This clause confirms that the Assignor does indeed own the benefit of the debt and has not assigned it to anyone else. The clause also includes a requirement that the Assignor writes to the debtor to notify them that the debt has been assigned to another party. The Assignor must send this written notification within 7 days of the date that the Deed of Assignment of Debt is entered into. You may want to delete clause 3.2 which is a warranty from the party assigning the debt that if it becomes necessary to incur costs to recover the debt then they will pay those costs.

There are a few other standard clauses that do not need mention here – they are fully covered in the guide. You then sign the document as a deed and the guide tells you how to to that.

Schedule – Notice of Assignment of Debt

The notice that you need to give to the debtor is contained in the schedule. Fill it in, sign it and send it to the debtor within 7 days of the date of the assignment. The template assumes it is the original creditor giving notice, but either party can do so.

Here at Legalo we provide cost-effective document and agreement templates to businesses to enable them to do more legal matters themselves. So take a look at our range of debt recovery letters to assist your business in better credit control.

• Related Templates Deed of Assignment of a Judgment Debt Notice of Assignment of Debt