phd candidate nedi

Üniversiteni Tanıt, öğrencilere kaliteli içerikler sunarak faydalı bilgiler sağlar.

YKS 2024 Puanları
DGS 2024 Puanları
LGS 2024 Puanları
Hesaplamalar
YKS Tercih Robotu
Üniversiteni Tanıt

Öğrenciler için faydalı içeriklerimizden haberdar olmak için abone ol

Üniversite Karşılaştır!
Tercih Robotu 2024

PhD Nedir? Doktora Derecesi Nasıl Alınır?

Yüksek lisans öğrencilerinin akademik kariyerlerine devam etmek istemesi önlerine bir soru çıkarıyor. PHD nedir, doktora derecesi nasıl alınır? Haydi öğrenelim.

PhD’nin tarihi ile başlayalım

Eğitimin evrildiği 19. yüzyıl dönemlerinde Almanya’nın modern araştırma üniversitesi tarafından bir derece olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Yüksek lisans eğitiminden sonra gereken yeterlilik sağlanırsa öğrenciler en yüksek akademik rütbe olan doktora derecesini almaya aday olabileceklerdir.

PHD, yani yabancı ismiyle Doctor of Philosophy , doktora derecesi olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Eski Yunancaya göre Felsefe Doktoru olarak olarak çevirilmektedir. Lisans programlarını ve yüksek lisans eğitminin derecesini başarıyla elde eden öğrenciler, ilgili bilim dalında doktora yapabilmektedirler. Buradan sonra alınan başarı, uluslararası geçerliliğe sahip olan bilim doktoru veya Doctor of Philosophy olarak unvan kişiye kazandırılmaktadır.

PHD nasıl yapılır?

PHD yapmak isteyen öğrenciler için sağlamak zorunda olması gereken bazı şartlar bulunmaktadır. Akademik kariyerlerinin devamı için bu şartları sağlayan adaylar doktora programına başlayabilirler. Peki, gelelim doktora nasıl yapılır sorusunun cevabına. Doktoranın amacı ; öğrencilere bağımsız araştırma yapabilme, bilimsel konuları takip edebilme ve katma değer sağlayabilme, bunun sonucunda araştırma sonuçlarına göre bilimsel tez çalışması yürütebilme ve bu tezi sunma yeteneği kazandıracaktır.

PHD başvuru şartları nelerdir?

PHD başvurusu yapabilmek için öğrencileri bekleyen bazı şartlar vardır. Bu şartlar üniversiteden üniversiteye ve ülkeden ülkeye değişkenlik göstermektedir. Ortalama olarak doktora programına başvurmak için aşağıdaki başvuru şartlarını yerine getirmelidir:

Yabancı dil sınavları yeterlilik sınavına girerek istenen puanı elde etmek,
Lisans eğitimi ve yüksek lisanslarını iyi bir ortalama ile bitirebilmek,
Yüksek lisans not ortalaması minimum 3.00 olarak kabul edilmektedir,
55 ALES puanına sahip olmak,
Yurtdışı yüksek lisans eğitimi için IELTS veya TOEFL sınavlarında yeterlilik sağlamak.

Phd candidate ne demek

PHD candidate, Türkçe’ye çevirilmek istenirse bize Doktor adayı sonucunu verecektir. Yani gerekli yeterlilikleri tamamladıktan sonra doktoraya başlayan adaylar doktor adayı, PHD candidate veya doktora öğrencisi olarak adlandırılmaktadır.

PHD araştırma süreçleri nelerdir?

PHD araştırma süreçleri, genel olarak aşağıdaki gibi sıralanmaktadır:

Kaynak tarama
Araştırma konusunun detaylandırılarak belirlenmesi
Başlık belirlenmesi (Introduction)
Özet (Konuyu basit bir şekilde anlatan yazı)
Araştırma konusu içeriği (Research Context)
Araştırma soruları (Research Questions)
Araştırma yöntemi (Research Metodology)
Araştırma süresi (Research Timeline)
Bibliyografi (References/ Bibliography)

Türkiye’de kaç kişi PHD yapıyor?

2022 YÖK verilerine göre Türkiye’de toplam 109540 kişi doktora programına kayıtlıdır. Bu kişilerden 53361 kişi kız, 56179 kişi ise erkek öğrencidir.

PHD'nin önemi nedir?

PhD'nin önemi oldukça geniştir ve farklı açılardan değerlendirilebilir. İşte PhD'nin önemine dair bazı anahtar noktalar:

Uzmanlık Alanında Derinlemesine Bilgi: PhD programları, öğrencilere uzmanlık alanlarında derinlemesine bilgi ve uzmanlık kazandırır. Bu sayede, öğrenciler kapsamlı ve detaylı bir şekilde çalıştıkları konuda uzmanlaşarak, o alandaki en güncel bilgileri ve gelişmeleri takip edebilirler.
Yenilikçi Araştırma Yeteneği: PhD öğrencileri, orijinal ve yenilikçi araştırmalar yapma becerisi kazanırlar. Bu sayede, bilgi birikimini artırırken aynı zamanda yeni bilgiler ve teoriler üretebilirler. Bu tür araştırmalar, bilimsel ve akademik topluluğun ilerlemesine katkı sağlar.
Akademik Kariyer İmkanları: PhD, akademik kariyerlerde önemli bir basamaktır. Doktora derecesine sahip olanlar, üniversitelerde öğretim üyeliği yapabilir ve araştırma merkezlerinde çalışabilirler. Ayrıca, doktora derecesi, akademik dünyadaki saygınlığı ve itibarı artırır.
Mesleki Gelişim ve Liderlik: PhD programları, öğrencilere eleştirel düşünme, problem çözme, liderlik ve iletişim becerilerini geliştirme fırsatı sunar. Bu, mezunların hem akademik hem de iş dünyasında başarılı olmalarını sağlar.
Toplumsal ve Ekonomik Katkı: PhD sahibi bireyler, topluma ve ekonomiye katkı sağlayan değerli bilgi ve uzmanlıkla donanmış olurlar. Yaptıkları araştırmalar ve çalışmalar, sosyal ve ekonomik problemlerin çözümünde önemli rol oynayabilir.

Doktora en erken kaç yılda biter?

Türkiye'deki doktora programlarının çoğu genellikle dört yıldır. Ancak, yurtdışında bu süre üç ila altı yıl arasında değişebilir. Dolayısıyla, doktora programlarının süresi ülkeye ve programın gerekliliklerine göre değişiklik gösterir. Türkiye'de doktora programları genellikle en az dört yıl sürerken, yurtdışında üç yıldan başlayıp altı yıla kadar uzayabilir.

Nerdler İçin Dünyanın En İyi Mühendislik Okulları

Bütünleşik doktora kaç yıl sürer?

Birleşik doktora programı, yüksek lisans ve doktora eğitimini tek bir çatı altında birleştiren bir öğrenim modelidir ve genellikle 5 yıl süresindedir. Bu programda, öğrenciler hem yüksek lisans hem de doktora düzeyindeki dersleri bir arada alır ve akademik çalışmalarını tamamlarlar. 5 yıl süresince yeterli akademik krediyi başarıyla tamamlayan öğrenciler, doktora derecesini elde etmeye hak kazanır ve mezun olurlar.

MBA Yapmak Ne Kazandırır?

PhD’nin açılımı nedir?

PhD açılımı Doctor of Philosophy ’dir. Türkiye ve dünyadaki en yüksek akademik rütbe doktora programıdır.

PhD kaç yıl sürer?

Türkiye’deki doktora programları 2 dönem doktora eğitimi, 6 dönem de bilimsel araştırma yani tez çalışmaları olarak toplamda 8 yarı dönem (4 yıl) gerçekleşmektedir. Yurtdışı üniversitelerinde bu süre değişkenlik göstermektedir. Örneğin İngiltere’de doktora programı 3 yıl, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri 'nde doktora eğitimi ortalama 4 yıl sürmektedir.

İş Başvurusu Maili Nasıl Yazılır?

PhD ünvanı nasıl kullanılır?

PhD ünvanı, doktora eğitimi alan kişilerin dersleri başarıyla tamamlamış, araştırma sonuçlarının (doktora tezi) başarılı bir şekilde onaylanmış kişilere verilen bir ünvandır.

Sizler için en çok aratılan konular PHD nedir, PHD açılımı nedir, PHD öğrencisi ne demek, Yüksek lisans PHD farkı gibi farklı soruların cevaplarını verdik. Umarız yararlı bilgiler edinebilmişsinizdir.

Hollanda'da Yüksek Lisans Yapmak

Fulbright Bursu Nedir?

Google Sertifikası İle CV'ni Güçlendir; Google Dijital Atölye Nedir?

3 Dakikada CV Oluştur

CV hazırla, kaydet, indir!

Üniversiteni Puanla

Yorum Yap, puan ver!

YKS Sıralamaları

Dgs puanları, lgs yüzdelik dilimleri, kpss lisans atamaları.

Research Voyage

Research Tips and Infromation

What is the Difference Between a PhD Candidate and a PhD Student?

Pursuing a doctoral degree is a significant academic achievement that requires years of dedicated study, research, and intellectual rigour. Within the realm of doctoral studies, the terms ‘PhD candidate’ and ‘PhD student’ are commonly used, often interchangeably. However, a closer examination reveals that there are nuanced differences between these two designations. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for both prospective doctoral students and those seeking to comprehend the various stages of the doctoral journey.

In this article, we delve into the disparity between a PhD candidate and a PhD student, shedding light on the roles, responsibilities, and progression associated with each stage. We explore the specific criteria that differentiate a student from a candidate and the various milestones marking the transition. Additionally, we delve into the responsibilities and expectations that accompany each designation, illuminating the unique experiences and commitments faced by PhD candidates and students.

Furthermore, we acknowledge the variability in terminology across international boundaries, academic institutions, and disciplinary fields, providing insights into how different contexts might influence the usage of these terms. By the end, readers will have a comprehensive understanding of the contrasting aspects between a PhD candidate and a PhD student, facilitating informed conversations and a deeper appreciation for the intricate nature of doctoral education.

Introduction

Who is a phd student, when phd student attains status of phd candidate, variation in terminology.

Pursuing a PhD (Doctor of Philosophy) degree involves conducting original research in a specific field of study, making a significant contribution to knowledge, and demonstrating a high level of expertise. It is the highest academic qualification one can attain and is highly valued in academia, research institutions, and certain industries. A PhD signifies a deep understanding of a subject area, advanced analytical and critical thinking skills, and the ability to conduct independent research.

While the terms “PhD candidate” and “PhD student” are often used interchangeably, there are subtle differences between the two.

A PhD student typically refers to an individual who has been admitted to a doctoral program, actively engaging in coursework and other program requirements. They are in the early stages of their doctoral journey and are working towards completing the necessary academic components of their degree. On the other hand, a PhD candidate is typically someone who has progressed beyond the coursework stage and has advanced to the research phase of their program. They have usually completed comprehensive exams, passed a research proposal defense, and are actively engaged in independent research for their dissertation or thesis.

The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the distinction between a PhD candidate and a PhD student. By exploring the criteria, milestones, and responsibilities associated with each designation, this article aims to clarify the unique experiences and progression of doctoral students. It also seeks to address the varying terminology used across different contexts and disciplines, enabling readers to grasp the intricacies of the doctoral journey and fostering informed discussions around this topic.

Through this article, readers will gain a comprehensive understanding of the journey from being a PhD student to becoming a PhD candidate and the distinct roles and responsibilities associated with each stage.

A PhD student is an individual who has been admitted to a doctoral program and is actively engaged in pursuing their doctoral studies. They are at the initial stages of their doctoral journey, seeking to expand their knowledge, skills, and expertise in a specific field of study. PhD students play a vital role in academic research communities as they contribute to the generation of new knowledge and the advancement of their discipline.

PhD students are required to complete a set of coursework specific to their field of study. These courses are designed to provide a foundation in the discipline, enhance research skills, and broaden the student’s understanding of relevant theories and methodologies. Coursework may include seminars, advanced classes, and specialized topics. The specific coursework requirements can vary between programs and disciplines.

Example: Imagine a student named Alex who has just been accepted into a doctoral program in psychology. At this stage, Alex is considered a PhD student as they begin taking relevant coursework, attending seminars, and collaborating with faculty members. They are laying the foundation for their research and acquiring the necessary knowledge in their field.

Who is a PhD Candidate?

Advancement from being a PhD student to a PhD candidate typically involves meeting specific requirements set by the doctoral program. These requirements may vary depending on the institution and field of study but often include successful completion of coursework, exams, and other program-specific milestones.

One of the primary requirements for transitioning to a PhD candidate is the successful completion of coursework and exams. PhD students are expected to complete a designated set of courses, which provide a broad understanding of their field and research methodologies. They are also required to pass comprehensive exams, which assess their comprehensive knowledge and understanding of their research area.

As part of the transition to becoming a PhD candidate, students typically prepare and defend a research proposal. The research proposal outlines the scope, objectives, methodology, and significance of the intended research. The proposal defense may involve presenting the proposal to a committee of faculty members, who evaluate its feasibility, rigour, and contribution to the field. Additionally, PhD students often have to pass comprehensive exams, which test their knowledge of their research area and related disciplines.

If you are not familiar with writing PhD proposal and making PhD proposal presentation, then visit my articles on “ How to Write PhD Proposal Presentation to the University ” and ” How to Make a PhD Proposal Presentation to the University Panel” . These articles will guide you through the process of preparation and presentation of PhD proposal to the University panel.

Upon successful completion of the requirements, PhD students are often granted candidacy status. Advancement to candidacy signifies that the student has demonstrated the necessary knowledge, skills, and potential to conduct independent research and contribute to their field. This status allows students to focus more exclusively on their research and dissertation work.

Once students become PhD candidates, there is a shift towards an increased emphasis on independent research. They are expected to dedicate a significant portion of their time and effort to conducting original research, collecting data, analyzing results, and making novel contributions to their field. The focus is primarily on their dissertation or thesis work, which serves as the culmination of their doctoral studies.

Example: Let’s consider a PhD student named Alex in the field of computer science. After completing their coursework and passing comprehensive exams, Alex develops a research proposal outlining their intention to investigate the applications of machine learning in cybersecurity. They present the proposal to a committee of faculty members, who assess the feasibility and potential impact of the research.

Alex successfully defends their research proposal and is granted candidacy status, transitioning from a PhD student to a PhD candidate. With candidacy status, Alex’s focus shifts towards conducting independent research. They spend considerable time collecting and analyzing cybersecurity datasets, developing and refining machine learning algorithms, and testing their effectiveness in detecting and preventing cyber threats.

As a PhD candidate, Alex works closely with their advisor, regularly discussing research progress, seeking guidance, and receiving feedback. They collaborate with other researchers in the field, attend conferences to present their findings and contribute to the scholarly community through publications. The focus is now on producing an original and significant contribution to the field of computer science through their dissertation.

The transition to PhD candidacy marks a critical stage in the doctoral journey, as it signifies the ability to independently drive research and make scholarly contributions. PhD candidates like Alex are immersed in the world of research, expanding knowledge, and pushing the boundaries of their field.

Terminology related to PhD candidates and PhD students can vary internationally and among different academic institutions. In some countries, the terms “PhD candidate” and “PhD student” may be used interchangeably, while in others, there may be specific distinctions. For example, in the United States, “PhD student” is commonly used, while in the United Kingdom, “PhD candidate” is more frequently employed. Additionally, different universities or institutions may have their own terminology preferences, which can create further variation.

Terminology can also vary based on the disciplinary field of study. Different academic disciplines have their own conventions and terminology for referring to individuals pursuing a doctoral degree. For instance, in the sciences, one might encounter terms like “graduate researcher” or “doctoral candidate.” In the humanities and social sciences, the terms “PhD candidate” and “PhD student” are often used. This variation reflects the specific linguistic and cultural norms within different academic domains.

In Canada, for instance, doctoral students are commonly referred to as “PhD candidates,” regardless of their stage in the program. In Australia, “PhD candidate” is the preferred term for those who have completed the required coursework and have advanced to the research phase. In contrast, in the United States, “PhD student” is frequently used to refer to individuals at all stages of their doctoral studies.

Disciplinary variations can also be observed. In engineering, individuals pursuing a doctoral degree are often referred to as “PhD students” or “doctoral students.” In contrast, in the field of education, the term “PhD candidate” is commonly used to denote those who have advanced to the research and dissertation stage.

It is important to note that these examples represent general trends, and there can still be variation within specific institutions and programs. The usage of terminology can evolve over time and may be influenced by regional or institutional preferences.

The distinction between a PhD candidate and a PhD student holds significant importance in the realm of doctoral education.

While these terms are often used interchangeably, they represent different stages and responsibilities within the doctoral journey. A PhD student is in the initial stages of their program, actively engaging in coursework, research, and academic requirements.

On the other hand, a PhD candidate has advanced beyond coursework, passed comprehensive exams, and is focused primarily on independent research and the completion of their dissertation.

Upcoming Events

Visit the Upcoming International Conferences at Exotic Travel Destinations with Travel Plan
Visit for Research Internships Worldwide

Research Assistant/PhD candidate in Environmental Process Technology

Job information, offer description.

Job Summary

Position: Full-Time Research Assistant (PhD Candidate) – Ghent University Global Campus

Department: Centre for Green Chemistry and Environmental Biotechnology

Degree: Master in Environmental or Chemical Engineering

Contract: 1-year fixed-term contract, renewable upon evaluation (Max. 4 years PhD study)

Occupancy rate: 100%

Vacancy Type: Assistant Academic Staff (AAP)

Last application date: 30 Sep 2024

Starting date: 1 Dec 2024 (negotiable)

Scientific Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ir. Di Wu ( [email protected] )

Introduction

Ghent University Global Campus (GUGC; http://www.ugent.be/globalcampus/en ) is an integrated campus of Ghent University, Belgium, and the first European university to be part of the Incheon Global Campus (IGC) in Incheon, South Korea. Ghent University is one of the top 100 universities in the world (e.g. ARWU ranking, US News), and in the top 100 for the subjects Biotechnology and Environmental Science (the recent QS subject ranking #46 in global). Ghent University Global Campus is an equal opportunities employer.

Centre for GReen chEmistry and environmentAl Technology (GREAT) is one of the five existing research centers of GUGC. It was established in 2015 with the aim of delivering scientific outcomes that will have a real impact on consolidation of environmental issues, themes, and topics, and to do this under one umbrella to highlight their interconnectedness and interdisciplinary nature. GREAT targets at the development of microbiological and nano-scale science and technology for the next generation of advanced functional materials and process technologies that enable solutions for various environmental and energy problems. In the 8 years’ development, GREAT was well-equipped with state-of-art instruments for environmental and material science research, published >300 papers, and received national and international funding support (e.g. NRF, KEITI, NERI, BOF, FWO, Horizon2020, etc.), and built strong collaborations with Belgian, Korean and oversea top universities.

Laboratory of Environmental and Sustainable Engineering (LESE; www.dwese.com ) led by Dr Di Wu was recently established in GUGC (from 2021), with a focus on water-energy research and resource recovery process technology. To expand its research capacity, LESE plans to recruit a new academic member for a resarch assistant position (concurrent with PhD study) focused on innovative, integrated environmental process technology. The candidate will collaborate with scientific staff and engineers to conduct pilot-scale experiences on sulfur cycle-associate anammox bioprocess and investigate the extraction of Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS) from sulfur-anammox biomass (Ref.: Water Research 224, 119051; Water Research 233, 119775). According to the research project needs, the candidate need to conduct collaborative research in GUGC (South Korea) and the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST, Hong Kong) for the collaborative research project, as described on the website https://wwrf.hkust.edu.hk/ ).

Job Position

Ghent University Global Campus, South Korea, has a vacancy for a Research Assistant (PhD Candidate), starting from 1 Dec 2024 (open to negotiation). The request(s) and standard(s) for the PhD in GUGC is equivalent to Ghent University's home campus (the PhD certificate will be awarded by the Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Belgium). It concerns a 1-year full-time position for a renewable period of a maximum of 4 years (for PhD study).

The candidate will work at the Center of Green Chemistry and Environmental Biotechnology of the Ghent University Global Campus (South Korea), and the Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Control and Treatment of Heavy Metal Pollution, at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Hong Kong) for joint research.

Job Description

To conduct research in the area of Environmental Engineering Science related to biological wastewater treatment and resource recovery.
The detailed working plan will explore upon the background and interests of the individual candidate (e.g. supporting national/international fellowship application, pursuing PhD study, transferring technology for application and commercialization).
To finalize the doctoral thesis within the given period with good publications.
To assist his/her supervisor(s) with tasks in ongoing and future R&D projects.

Where to apply

Requirements.

Hold, or expect to hold, by 30 Aug. 2024, a Master's degree in one of the following disciplines: Environmental or Chemical Engineering.
Have solid and relevant lab experimental experiences in biological wastewater treatment research area; having publication(s) in environmental science and technologies is a plus.
Have an excellent command of English (e.g. a minimum score of 80 on the TOEFL iBT test or 6.5 IELTS test), and good academic writing and presentation skills – GUGC’s working medium is English, working fluency in English is a must.
Team spirit and inquisitive, self-motive attitude as well as independent learning/research ability are essential; can take leadership among team members.

Additional Information

Scientific background and knowledge
Working experiences

Application Documents

Motivation letter (1-page)
Full resume (CV), including at least 2 references’ contacts
Copy of the transcripts for bachelor and master study (overview of study results and ranking)
Others (subjected to the requirement in the later stage)

The documents shall be merged into a single PDF file (<10MB) and sent to [email protected] (Subject line: PhD_Application_Surname). Please be kindly noted only the selected candidate(s) will be contacted for the next step.

Application Process and Interview

Interviews (in-person or online) will take place in stages from the first available time.
Applicants are encouraged to apply immediately as the position will be filled upon finding the right candidate.
We reserve the right to hold applications on file for potential future job openings.
For submission of your file and any inquiries, please contact us via e-mail: [email protected]

Selection Process

CV Screening -> Interview(s) -> Internal Committee -> Acceptance Notice.

Compensation & Benefits for the candidate selected.

Standard Terms for RA/PhD at GUGC (or HKUST)

Work Location(s)

Share this page.

Majors & Careers
Online Grad School
Preparing For Grad School
Student Life

PhD Candidate vs Student: What’s the Difference?

Many people use the terms “PhD student” and “PhD candidate” interchangeably. However, these terms actually mean something quite different, including a different status level at universities.

We’re here to define the differences between a PhD candidate vs student, as well as other essential information, before you continue your educational journey.

Table of Contents

What I s a PhD student?

A doctoral student is anyone who is enrolled in a doctorate degree, also referred to as a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) program. PhD students are typically required to complete a certain number of course credits and sit qualifying exams. Next, they can move on to conduct research and present it in the form of a dissertation.

A PhD is centered around self-directed research and possibly teaching/running tutorials, but they typically also involve a substantial amount of coursework and require attending classes, either online or in person.

Unlike candidates, PhD students are in the process of completing the required coursework for the degree. They haven’t passed the relevant qualifying exams yet.

What Is a PhD Candidate?

A PhD candidate has completed the required coursework and passed the qualifying exams for their doctorate program. They are currently working on their dissertation.

Most PhD students need to go through an application process and show they meet certain requirements such as a relevant master’s degree . To become a PhD candidate, doctoral students need to pass an internal application process, typically involving a set of exams.

This stage involves significant research usually in innovative areas and incorporating this into a dissertation (this stage is sometimes referred to as “all but dissertation” [ABD]), as they’ve completed all other aspects of the program and satisfied these requirements. To complete their doctoral journey, a PhD candidate must defend their dissertation. Once they’ve successfully done this, they will be awarded their degree and move from PhD candidate to doctor of their chosen field.

PhD Candidate vs Student: 6 Key Differences

view of students in lecture hall from above

There are a number of key differences between a PhD student vs PhD candidate, from their status to the structure and nature of study.

Note: Some universities have recently started adopting hybrid approaches (where there is no clear difference between PhD students and PhD candidates). These programs don’t involve any qualifying exams and students typically begin the dissertation as part of their coursework. Most schools, however, continue with the traditional distinction between a PhD candidate and PhD student.

1. Program Stage

A PhD student could be at any stage of the doctoral program . Coursework still needs to be completed and qualifying exams must be passed. Students may be in the initial stage of the program or about to complete the coursework (before beginning their research).

On the other hand, a PhD candidate has completed all coursework and has at least started their research. They may have completed their dissertation and are preparing to defend it.

2. Research Progress

A PhD student may not have selected their research topic or settled on a particular research question. A candidate’s research is in progress and they should already have a clear research question.

3. Relationship with Advisors

A PhD student may not yet have an advisor. A candidate has an established working relationship with their advisor and works closely with them to complete their research and dissertation.

4. Level of Support

Although they work closely with an advisor, a PhD candidate is generally expected to work more independently than a student enrolled in a doctoral student. Once candidates reach this stage of their doctorate, they typically won’t receive as much direction or supervision.

5. Flexibility and Structure

Understandably, PhD candidates have more freedom and flexibility in their work. Most candidates choose their area of research, as well as the methods used to conduct their work. As part of their coursework, PhD students usually have to work within a set structure (e.g., completing core subjects, meeting deadlines).

Being a PhD candidate comes with a certain degree of status. If they’ve demonstrated a degree of expertise through completing qualifying exams, candidates can put the letters PhD(c) after their name.

Tips for PhD Candidates

view of library stacks on all three sides

A PhD is an advanced degree designed to demonstrate expertise in a given field, as well as high-level skills and abilities in various areas (including research and writing). As such, earning a doctorate can be a challenging process.

The following tips for doctoral candidates will help you put your best foot forward and set yourself up for success.

Stay Organized

Because PhD candidates have to balance many competing priorities, organization is essential. Using organizational tools such as calendars, note-taking apps , and project management software can help you keep track of deadlines and meet your targets.

Focus on Your Research

PhD candidates likely have busy schedules with plenty of demands (such as teaching commitments and crafting a dissertation). As it’s the backbone of any doctoral program, be sure to prioritize this part of your work and monitor progress to stay on track.

Actively Seek Out Feedback

Because PhD candidates often work independently, there’s a risk of feeling isolated. Ask your advisors, mentors, and fellow candidates for feedback and advice. This will help ensure that you’re considering all aspects of your research question and multiple solutions, rather than focusing too intensely on a single area.

Take Advantage of Networking Opportunities

Networking is one of the biggest benefits for PhD candidates, so take full advantage of these events. Use this time to build a strong network of professors, advisors, fellow candidates, and other professionals you meet at conferences and events.

Take Care of Yourself

A PhD program can be taxing, and it’s easy for your mental and physical health to take a backseat. Make sure you exercise, eat well, and get enough sleep . Remember: Resting and recharging is crucial for working on your dissertation.

How Long Is a Typical PhD Candidacy?

view of ivy league building with autumn leaves

Most PhD students require 1-2 years to complete their coursework and pass their qualifying exams. However, the length of a PhD candidacy is much more open. In most cases, programs take between two and five years, depending on:

the complexity of the field of research
the candidate’s other commitments, such as teaching load
other abilities, such as a candidate’s level of organization.

Once a PhD candidate has completed their dissertation, they have to defend it successfully before a panel of faculty members before they can earn their doctorate degree. This process of defending a PhD dissertation can take several months.

Some universities specify a maximum length for PhD candidacy duration. For example, Carnegie Mellon University limits this to six years .

Benefits of Being a PhD Candidate

Being a PhD candidate can be rewarding for several reasons:

1. Research Opportunities

You’ll be exposed to vast research opportunities in your field. You may contribute to valuable discoveries while developing advanced knowledge and skills.

2. Networking

Through your PhD candidacy, you’ll also be in a great position to build gain a stronger network of fellow professionals.

3. Critical Thinking

A PhD candidacy can help you develop high intellectual independence and critical thinking skills.

4. Career Opportunitie s

A PhD is an advanced degree that allows you to build a rewarding career in the academic, government, and private sectors. PhD-holders can also expect to earn more than other graduates and are most likely to find a job.

5. Salaries

According to Northeastern University , professionals with a doctorate degree earn an average annual salary of $99,290 on average (and much more for the highest-paid PhDs ) and have a 1.5% unemployment rate. For master’s degree holders, the average annual salary is $81,867 average annual salary and a 2.6% unemployment rate.

6. Personal Fulfillment

Being a PhD candidate can help you pursue your passions. This advanced qualification will allow you to become a specialist in your chosen field, allowing you to hone in on the exact subject thatl fulfills you the most.

Qualifying Exams to Become a PhD Candidate

While requirements vary by program, to become a PhD candidate, most students will need to pass a set of exams. These will test students’ knowledge in the field, measure their research skills, and ensure they’re ready to start their dissertation research.

Traditionally, qualifying exams for PhD candidates involved a written test and an oral exam. These will cover a range of topics related to your field of study, with the oral component designed to demonstrate your level of understanding.

Some universities have recently started to issue doctoral students with a set of questions and have them submit the answers within a set timeframe (usually around two weeks). Other schools ask prospective doctoral candidates to submit a dissertation proposal instead of an exam.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a phd candidate be called a doctor.

In most cases, a doctoral candidate cannot be called a doctor until after they successfully defend their dissertation and receive their doctorate.

Can I Put ‘PhD Candidate’ after My Name?

Once you’ve passed qualifying exams and embarked on dissertation research, you’re technically entitled to put “PhD candidate” or “PhD (c)” after your name. However, this is uncommon and not always recommended. It is generally more acceptable to mention that you are pursuing a doctorate (along with the field of research and university) or that you expect to complete your PhD in a certain year (on your CV and online profiles).

How Long Can You Be a PhD Candidate?

There isn’t a set length of time that a person can be a PhD candidate. The length of candidacy depends on a range of factors, including the subject of research and program requirements. Most PhD candidates complete this phase in around 3-5 years (where some university programs have set limits).

Do PhD Students Take Classes?

Yes, most PhD students must take classes and complete coursework as part of the first 1-2 years of their doctorate program. Once they’ve completed this coursework and passed qualifying exams, they move on to work on their research dissertation. At this stage, they’ll be considered a PhD candidate.

Key Takeaways

Now that you know the differences between PhD candidates vs. students, you’ve got a deeper understanding of how to obtain a doctorate. However you slice it, both will help you build your knowledge and skills to become an expert in your field.

However the program is structured, a PhD is a highly valuable degree that allows you to become a high-level professional and build a successful career.

If you know a PhD candidate who’s celebrating their accomplishments soon? Take a look at this guide to the best PhD graduation gifts .

10 Best PhD Programs in Pennsylvania
Top 10 Best PhD in Cybersecurity Online Programs
10 Top PhD Programs in Chemistry
The Top 10 Easiest PhDs: Tuition, Duration, and Financial Aid
Top 10 Fully Funded PhD Programs and Universities
Top 10 Best PhD in Medicine Programs

Lisa Marlin

Lisa is a full-time writer specializing in career advice, further education, and personal development. She works from all over the world, and when not writing you'll find her hiking, practicing yoga, or enjoying a glass of Malbec.

Lisa Marlin https://blog.thegradcafe.com/author/lisa-marlin/ 30+ Best Dorm Room Essentials for Guys in 2024
Lisa Marlin https://blog.thegradcafe.com/author/lisa-marlin/ 12 Best Laptops for Computer Science Students
Lisa Marlin https://blog.thegradcafe.com/author/lisa-marlin/ ACBSP Vs AACSB: Which Business Program Accreditations is Better?
Lisa Marlin https://blog.thegradcafe.com/author/lisa-marlin/ BA vs BS: What You Need to Know [2024 Guide]

14 Cheap Spring Break Destinations for College Students in 2024

How to get a master’s without a bachelor’s: the complete guide, related posts.

When to Apply for Grad School: The Simple Guide [2026/2027]

When to Apply for Grad School: Easy Monthly Timeline [2026-2027]

Guys need these items to complete their dorm rooms.

30+ Best Dorm Room Essentials for Guys in 2024

Best Laptop for Programming Students in 2024

This financial planning app helps students prepare for college and grad school.

The Sassy Digital Assistant Revolutionizing Student Budgeting

The GradCafe released a whitepaper with a decade's worth of data on graduate admission trends for computer science programs.

Computer Science Graduate Admission Trends: Annual Results

The Best Academic Planners for 2024/2025

News & Events

College of arts and science alumni of influence recipients recognized for outstanding achievements.

Posted on 2024-05-23 in Arts & Culture , Politics & Society , Alumni and Giving , Indigenous , College Vision

Four remarkable individuals have been chosen as recipients of the 2024 College of Arts and Science Alumni of Influence (AOI) Awards.

This year’s AOI recipients include philanthropist and geologist Gordon Beach (BSc’74), author and photographer Tenille Campbell (BA’07), technology sector leader and mentor Aaron Genest (BSc’07, PhD’13) and Saskatchewan politician and educator Pat Atkinson (BA’73, BEd’77).

The AOI Awards celebrate and recognize outstanding alumni from the University of Saskatchewan (USask) College of Arts and Science. The recipients’ remarkable achievements and contributions have an impact on their respective fields, communities, and the university.

“The College of Arts and Science is thrilled to recognize and celebrate the four recipients of this year’s Alumni of Influence Awards: Gordon Beach, Aaron Genest, Tenille Campbell, and Pat Atkinson,” said Dr. Brooke Milne (PhD), dean of the College of Arts and Science.

“Upon graduating from the college, each of these individuals have built pathways to success through their achievements, leadership, and mentorship of others in their respective workplaces, communities, and beyond. They are exemplars of what the world needs. On behalf of the college, I want to express how proud I am to recognize these esteemed Arts and Science alumni, and I look forward to celebrating this recognition with them.”

The four 2024 AOI recipients join the ranks of more than 150 members who have been inducted since 2009. This is a special tradition and the highest honour for alumni at the college level. This is the first time the awards have been presented since the program was paused in 2020 due to the pandemic.

Award recipients will connect with current students, graduates and faculty in the coming weeks as they continue to be ambassadors for their departments, the college and the university.

If there is a College of Arts and Science graduate who is making an impact in their community, submit a recommendation. Recommendations can be submitted at any time during the year.

About the 2024 Alumni of Influence recipients

Gordon Beach (BSc’74)

Gordon Beach is a geologist and philanthropist from Midale, Sask. He grew up and attended school in the Weyburn area. Beach graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree, high honours, from USask in 1974. During his career, he was an employee, then an independent consultant, in the oil and gas industry until his retirement in 2012. Beach said he retired to go to the ski hills and bicycle while vacationing with his wife, Helen. The pair have two daughters and four grandchildren.

While at USask, Beach joined a student society in the Department of Geological Sciences called the Ore Gangue. Based on his experience, he created the Ore Gangue Alumni Bursary Fund. He has encouraged other alumni to donate to the fund, which has helped financially support more than 35 students in the department. His philanthropy, leadership and enthusiasm has encouraged others to “pay it forward.”

Tenille Campbell (BA’07)

Tenille K. Campbell is a Dene and Métis author and photographer from English River First Nation, Sask. She is a PhD candidate in the USask Department of English, since completing her MFA in Creative Writing at the University of British Columbia, and a BA Honours in English from USask.

She is an award-winning poet with two published collections: #IndianLovePoems and Nedi Nezu. Her work currently focuses on themes of joy, desire, and matriarchy. She is also the artist behind sweetmoon photography, having spent more than 10 years capturing the complexities of Indigenous life and love from behind the lens.

Campbell was named a CBC Saskatchewan Future 40 recipient in 2017. She is currently the USask Indigenous Storyteller-In-Residence. Her work is an ode to culture, to community, to connection.

Aaron Genest (BSc’07, PhD’13)

Dr. Aaron Genest holds a BSc and PhD in Computer Science from USask. He is a member of the technology community, who helps leaders of start-ups navigate technical, governance, talent acquisition and sales challenges.

He is a manager of a team of engineers at Siemens, and is the president of SaskTech, an industry advisory organization to government and education stakeholders.

Genest is involved in various aspects of USask, including being part of the Senate and the Dean’s Advisory Committee in Engineering. He is a mentor through USask’s SIGMA entrepreneurship program, the USask Connects graduate mentorship program, and is an advisor, advocate, and speaker for the OPUS deep tech incubator at USask.

Pat Atkinson (BA’73, BEd’77)

Pat Atkinson is an educator and Saskatchewan politician from Biggar, Sask. She attended high school in Saskatoon before going to USask to earn a Bachelor of Arts (Honours) degree in 1973 and an education degree in 1977. Atkinson worked as a teacher, union organizer and principal until 1986 when she was first elected to the Saskatchewan Legislature.

For 25 years, she served as an MLA as part of the New Democratic Party (NDP) in the Saskatoon Nutana and Saskatoon Broadway constituencies. Between 1986-2011, Atkinson held many Cabinet positions in the provincial government, including Social Services, Post-Secondary Education, Health, Education, Finance and Deputy Leader of the Opposition. She is the longest serving woman parliamentarian in Saskatchewan history.

Since 2011, Atkinson has worked internationally and nationally with parliamentarians, public servants, political party activists and candidates. She has received many notable recognitions over the years, including the USask College of Education Alumni Wall of Honour, Saskatchewan Centennial Medal, 125 th Anniversary of Canadian Confederation Medal and Queen Elizabeth II Platinum and Golden Jubilee Medals.

Getting to know the school for the arts inaugural director.

Posted by Kristen McEwen on 2024-08-08

Posted on 2024-08-08

Andrew Denton (PhD) is setting plans in motion to create the new school’s legacy at the University of Saskatchewan (USask)

Alumni Book Nook: Dr. Matthew R. Anderson (BA’81)

Posted by Kristen McEwen on 2024-07-31

Posted on 2024-07-31

Dr. Matthew R. Anderson’s latest book is The Good Walk: Creating New Paths on Traditional Prairie Trails

Pursuing his passions on the stage and in the classroom

Posted by Kristen McEwen on 2024-07-30

Posted on 2024-07-30

Cree educator and actor Chris Krug-Iron (BEd’21, CWT’22, BFA’23) is performing at the Shakespeare on the Saskatchewan festival this summer and is set to teach Grades 2 and 3 this fall

AIRING: 3rd Annual MFA Group Exhibition

Posted by Christopher Putnam on 2024-07-25

Posted on 2024-07-25

Presenting works from the 2024 Masters of Fine Arts graduating class

Couzyn van Heuvelen: CAMP

Posted by Christopher Putnam on 2024-07-24

Posted on 2024-07-24

Couzyn van Heuvelen’s artistic practice asserts the resiliency and adaptability of Inuit culture

MFA Exhibition: Demilade Otayemi

AJAKUBO (Whirlwind): The Journey of Belonging

What is a PhD?

Types of Doctorates
A Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) is the highest globally recognized postgraduate degree that higher education institutions can award.
PhDs are awarded to candidates who undertake original and extensive research in a particular field of study.
Full time PhD programmes typically last three to four years, whilst part time PhD programmes typically last six to seven years.
A PhD can lead to an academia teaching role or a career in research. A PhD can also equip you with skills suitable for a wide range of jobs unrelated to your research topic or academia.

Definition of a PhD – A Doctor of Philosophy (commonly abbreviated to PhD , Ph.D or a DPhil ) is a university research degree awarded from across a broad range of academic disciplines; in most countries, it is a terminal degree, i.e. the highest academic degree possible.

PhDs differ from undergraduate and master’s degrees in that PhDs are entirely research-based rather than involving taught modules (although doctoral training centres (DTCs) offer programmes that start with a year of lecture-based teaching to help develop your research skills prior to starting your project).

In most English-speaking countries, those that complete a PhD use the title “Doctor” (typically abbreviated to Dr) in front of their names and are referred to as such within academic and/or research settings. Those that work in fields outside of academia may decide not to use the formal doctor title but use post-nominal letters (e.g. John Smith PhD); it’s unusual though for someone to use both the Doctor title and post-nominal letters in their name.

PhD vs Doctorate

A PhD and a professional doctorate are both research-based terminal degrees.

However, where a PhD focuses on original research mostly around theoretical concepts, a professional doctorate focuses on examining existing knowledge to solve real-life, practical problems.

While there is much crossover between the two, a PhD is generally better suited for an individual to wants to advance the knowledge and understanding in their field, and a professional doctorate degree is better suited to a working professional who wants to better be able to apply knowledge and understanding to their field.

What Are the Entry Requirements for a PhD?

To be accepted on to a PhD programme, students usually need to hold at least a high ( 2:1 and above ) undergraduate degree that is related to the field of research that they want to pursue. A PhD candidate may also be expected to hold a Master’s degree , however, this does not mean you must have one, as it is still possible to enrol into a PhD without a Master’s .

Self-funded courses may sometimes be more relaxed in relation to entry requirements . It may be possible to be accepted onto a self-funded PhD programme with lower grades, though these students typically demonstrate their suitability for the role through professional work experience.

Whilst a distance learning project is possible , most PhD candidates will carry out their research over at least three years based at their university, with regular contact with two academic supervisors (primary and secondary). This is particularly the case for lab-based projects, however, some PhD projects require spending time on-site away from university (e.g. at a specialist research lab or at a collaborating institution abroad).

How Long Does a PhD Take?

Typically, full-time PhDs last 3-4 years and part-time PhDs last 6-7 years. However, at the discretion of the university, the thesis writing-up period can be extended by up to four years.

Although most doctoral programmes start in September or October, they are generally much more flexible than taught-courses and can start at any time of the year.

How Much Does a PhD Cost?

Tuition fees for UK and EU students vary between £3,000 and £6,000 per year, with the average tuition fee of £4,712 per year for 2023/24 programmes.

Tuition fees increase considerably for international students, varying between £16,000 to £25,000 per year, with an average tuition fee of £19,600 per year .

Nonetheless, most students will secure PhD funding in the form of studentships, scholarships and bursaries to help pay for these fees. These funding opportunities can either be partial, which cover tuition fees only, or full, which cover both tuition fees and living expenses.

UK national students can also apply for Doctoral Loans from Student Finance England if they are unable to secure funding.

Finding a PhD has never been this easy – search for a PhD by keyword, location or academic area of interest.

What Does a PhD Involve?

To be awarded a PhD, a doctoral student is required to produce a substantial body of work that adds new knowledge to their chosen field.

A PhD programme will typically involve four key stages:

Stage 1: Literature Review

The first year of a PhD involves attending regular meetings with your supervisors and carrying out a search on previously published work in your subject area. This search will be used to produce a literature review which should set the context of the project by explaining the foundation of what is currently known within the field of research, what recent developments have occurred, and where the gaps in knowledge are. In most cases, this will be an extension of your research proposal should you have produced one as part of your application. The literature review should conclude by outlining the overarching aims and objectives of the research project. This stage of setting achievable goals which are original and contribute to the field of research is an essential first step in a successful PhD.

The supervisor is the main point of contact through the duration of a PhD – but remember: they are there to mentor, not to teach, or do it for you . It will be your responsibility to plan, execute and monitor your own work as well as to identify gaps in your own knowledge and address them.

Stage 2: Research

The second year (and prehapse some of your third year) is when you work on your research. Having identified novel research questions from your review of the literature, this is where you collect your data to help answer these questions. How you do this will depend on the nature of your doctoral research: for example, you may design and run experiments in a lab alongside other PhD students or visit excavation sites in remote regions of the world. You should check in regularly with your supervisors to update them and run any ideas or issues past them.

Have the structure and chapters of your thesis in mind as you develop and tackle your research questions. Working with a view of publishing your work will be very valuable later on.

Stage 3: Write up of Thesis

The next key stage of a PhD is writing a doctoral thesis , which typically takes from anywhere between three months to one year. A thesis is a substantial body of work that describes the work and outcomes of the research over the previous two to three years. It should tell a detailed story of the PhD project – focusing on:

The motivations for the research questions identified from the literature review.
The methodologies used, results obtained, and a comprehensive analysis and discussion of the findings.
A detailed discussion of the key findings with an emphasis on the original contributions made to your field of research and how this has been impactful.

There is no universal rule for the length of a PhD thesis, but general guidelines set the word count between 80,000 to 100,000 words.

For your thesis to be successful, it needs to adequately defend your argument and provide a unique or increased insight into your field that was not previously available.

Stage 4: Attending the Viva

A viva voce , most commonly referred to as just a ‘ viva ‘, is an interview-style examination where the PhD student is required to engage in a critical appraisal of their work and defend their thesis against at least two examiners. The examiners will ask questions to check the PhD student has an in-depth understanding of the ideas and theories proposed in their thesis, and whether they have developed the research skills that would be expected of them.

The viva is one of the final steps in achieving a PhD, and typically lasts at least two hours, but this duration can vary depending on the examiners, the university and the PhD project itself.

Once you have done the viva – you’re on the home stretch. You will typically be asked to make some amendments to your thesis based on the examiner’s feedback. You are then ready to submit your final thesis for either:

PhD – If you pass the requirements you will be awarded a PhD degree (most common outcome),
MPhil – If you failed to meet requirements for a PhD, you may be downgraded to an MPhil degree (uncommon outcome),
Fail – No award is given, typically for cases of plagiarism (extremely uncommon outcome).

What Is It Like to Undertake a PhD?

We’re often asked what it is like to undertake a PhD study. Unfortunately, this isn’t a simple answer to this question as every research project is different.

To help give insight into the life of a PhD student, we’ve interviewed PhD students at various stages of their programmes and put together a series of PhD Student Interviews . Check out the link to find out what a PhD is like and what advice they have to offer you.

What Are the Benefits of A PhD?

A PhD is the highest globally recognised postgraduate degree that higher education institutions can award. The degree, which is awarded to candidates who demonstrate original and independent research in a particular field of study, is not only invaluable in itself, but sets you up with invaluable skills and traits.

Career Opportunities

First, a PhD prepares you for a career in academia if you wish to continue in this area. This takes form as a career in the Higher Education sector, typically as a lecturer working their way to becoming a professor leading research on the subject you’ve studied and trained in.

Second, a PhD also enables the opportunity for landing a job in a research & development role outside of the academic environment. Examples of this include laboratory work for a private or third sector company, a governmental role and research for commercial and industrial applications.

Transferable Skills

Finally, in possessing a PhD degree, you can show to employers that you have vital skills that make you an asset to any company. Three examples of the transferable skills that you gain through a PhD are effective communication, time management, and report writing.

Communication – presenting your work in written and oral forms using journal papers and podium presentations, shows your ability to share complex ideas effectively and to those with less background knowledge than you. Communication is key in the professional environment, regardless of the job.
Time management – The ability to prioritise and organise tasks is a tremendous asset in the professional industry. A PhD holder can use their qualification to demonstrate that they are able to manage their time, arrange and follow a plan, and stick to deadlines.
Report writing – Condensing three years of work into a thesis demonstrates your ability to filter through massive amounts of information, identify the key points, and get these points across to the reader. The ability to ‘cut out the waffle’ or ‘get to the point’ is a huge asset in the professional industry.

Aside from the above, you also get to refer to yourself as a Doctor and add fancy initials after your name!

What Can I Do After a PhD?

One of the most desirable postdoctoral fields is working within independent Research and Development (R&D) labs and new emerging companies. Both industries, especially R&D labs, have dedicated groups of PhD graduates who lead research activities, design new products and take part in crucial strategic meetings. Not only is this a stimulating line of work, but the average salaries in R&D labs and emerging start-ups are lucrative. In comparison, an undergraduate with five years of experience within their given field will, on average, likely earn less than a new PhD graduate taking on a R&D position.

It’s a common misunderstanding that PhDs only opens the door for an academic career such as university lecturers and training providers. Although obtaining a PhD opens these doors, the opportunities extend far beyond educational roles. In fact, recent data from the UK’s Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) indicates only 23% of PhD graduates take a position in educational roles . This low percentage is primarily because PhD graduates have a wide range of skills that make them suitable for a broad spectrum of roles. This is being seen first hand by the increasing number of PhD graduates who are entering alternative roles such as research, writing, law and investment banking.

How Do I Find a PhD?

We appreciate that finding a PhD programme to undertake can be a relatively daunting process. According to Higher Education Student Statistics , over 22,000 PhDs were awarded in 2016/17 within the United Kingdom alone. Clearly there are a huge number of PhD programmes available. This can sometimes be confusing for prospective doctorates, particularly when different programmes are advertised in different places. Often, it is difficult to know where to look or where to even start. We’ve put together a list of useful sources to find the latest PhD programmes:

A great place to start is with our comprehensive and up-to-date database of available PhD positions .
Assuming you are still at university, speak to an existing PhD supervisor within your department.
Attend as many postgraduate open days as you can. Whilst there, speak to current PhD students and career advisors to get an awareness of what PhDs are on offer.
Visit the postgraduate section of university websites and the PhD Research Council section of the UKRI website.

Browse PhDs Now

Join thousands of students.

Join thousands of other students and stay up to date with the latest PhD programmes, funding opportunities and advice.

/images/cornell/logo35pt_cornell_white.svg" alt="phd candidate nedi"> Cornell University --> Graduate School

Advancing to doctoral candidacy.

The A exam is also known as the examination for admission to candidacy. This oral exam may include a written component, as determined by your special committee. You can take the exam after completing two registered semesters in your program, but before beginning your seventh semester—unless special permission is obtained from the dean.

Passing the A exam means the graduate faculty believes that you are ready to proceed into the dissertation phase of your degree program.

Some fields may offer a special master’s degree after a doctoral candidate has completed four semesters of registration and either passed the A exam or performed at the level of an A exam. This is a master’s degree awarded to a student who is continuing on for the Ph.D., and is awarded without completion of a thesis.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Publications
Account settings
My Bibliography
Collections
Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

Create a new collection
Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

Search in PubMed
Search in NLM Catalog
Add to Search

Treatment outcome of acute coronary syndrome patients admitted to Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Mekelle, Ethiopia; A retrospective cross-sectional study

Affiliations.

1 Clinical Pharmacy Unit, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia.
2 Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
3 Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia.
4 Department of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Aksum University, Aksum, Tigray, Ethiopia.
PMID: 32053702
PMCID: PMC7018065
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228953
Correction: Treatment outcome of acute coronary syndrome patients admitted to Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Mekelle, Ethiopia; A retrospective cross-sectional study. Desta DM, Nedi T, Hailu A, Atey TM, Tsadik AG, Asgedom SW, Kasahun GG, Ayalew E. Desta DM, et al. PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0247961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247961. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33630968 Free PMC article.

Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is increasingly becoming a common cause of cardiovascular mortality in developing countries. Even though, there is an introduction of limited percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombolytic therapies, in-hospital mortality due to ACS still remains high in sub-Saharan countries.

Objective: The aim of the study was to assess treatment outcome of ACS patients admitted to Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Mekelle, Ethiopia.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was done by collecting data from patients' medical records using a data abstraction tool. Data were analyzed using logistic regression to determine crude and adjusted odds ratio. At 95% confidence interval, p-value<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results: Of the total 151 patients, in-hospital mortality was found to be 24.5%, and hypertension was the most frequent (46.4%) risk factor of ACS. Concerning the management practice, catheterization and primary percutaneous coronary intervention were done in 27.1%, and 3.9% respectively. Additionally, in emergency setting loading dose of aspirin and clopidogrel were used in about 63.8% and 62.8%, respectively. The other frequently used medications were beta-blockers (86.9%), angiotensin converting enzymes/angiotensin receptor blockers (84.1%) and statins (84.1%). Streptokinase was administered in 6.3% of patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction and heparins in 78.1% of them. The commonly prescribed discharge medications were aspirin (98.2%), statins (94.7%) and clopidogrel (92%). Non-use of beta-blockers (p = 0.014), in-hospital complication of cardiogenic shock (p = 0.001) and left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤ 30% (p = 0.032) were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion: The proportion of in-hospital mortality due to ACS was found to be high. Therefore, timely evidence based therapy should be implemented in the setup.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Fig 1. Final diagnosis of acute coronary…

Fig 1. Final diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome patients admitted from August 2013‒July 2018.

Fig 2. Discharge medications of acute coronary…

Fig 2. Discharge medications of acute coronary syndrome patients admitted from August 2013‒July 2018.

Fig 3. Predictors for in-hospital mortality of…

Fig 3. Predictors for in-hospital mortality of acute coronary syndrome patients from August 2013‒July 2018.

Related information

PubChem Compound (MeSH Keyword)

Grants and funding

Linkout - more resources, full text sources.

Europe PubMed Central
PubMed Central
Public Library of Science

Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

All categories

Cultural Anthropology and Development Sociology

Currently, the Institute of Cultural Anthropology and Development Sociology (CADS) hosts almost 50 PhD candidates working on a wide variety of topics.

The PhD Regulations (‘promotiereglement’) of Leiden University apply to all PhD candidates registered at the Graduate School of Social and Behavioural Sciences. All PhD candidates should be registered at the Graduate School by the beginning of their doctoral training.

The Netherlands School of Anthropology (NESA)

The Netherlands School of Anthropology (NESA) is a graduate programme for PhD candidates who work in the field of Cultural Anthropology and Development Sociology. This programme is a co-creation of the Anthropology faculties of 5 Dutch Faculties. NESA offers a one-year teaching and training programme especially for upcoming and all first year PhD candidates, consisting of 5 masterclasses on current and trending theoretical debates in our discipline, an extensive methodology training and occasionally a cohort meeting off campus.

PhD categories

The Institute of CADS distinguishes between two PhD categories:

Regular – A PhD candidate who is hired by CADS and thus a formal employee. These candidates are paid through ‘eerste geldstroom’ (including those funded by ‘profileringsgebieden’), ‘tweede geldstroom’ (NWO), or ‘derde geldstroom’ (EU).
Contract and External (‘beurspromovendi’ and ‘buitenpromovendi’) – A PhD candidate with a scholarship (for e.g. DIKTI [Indonesia] and CONACYT [Chile]) or self-funded.

Applying for a PhD

PhD scholarships are not offered outside of faculty research projects. If you intend to pursue a doctorate at the Institute of Cultural Anthropology and Development Sociology, you can:

Reply to an advertised PhD vacancy in a staff project
Apply with funding from a self-obtained research grant

This latter category of application is only permitted under certain conditions and subject to case-by-case evaluation by the Institute’s Research Committee. The decision is based, among other criteria, on the feasibility of the funding, quality of the proposed study, qualifications of the applicant, availability of adequate supervision, and relation of the proposed study to the Institute’s expertise.

If you have questions, please send an e-mail to Annemarie Samuels .

Important information

CADS offers regular and bench fee-paying PhD candidates a PhD track. The PhD track includes:

Registration at the FSW Graduate School;
FSW (e-mail)account;
A workspace at CADS;
A LU-Card (for the Library, photocopying and printing);
Access to library (also online);
Regular (monthly/bimonthly) meetings with (co)supervisor(s);
‘6 months’-meetings with the Director of Graduate Studies;
Annual review (Resultaat & Ontwikkelingsgesprek);
research seminars;
staff lunches, institute meetings and annual outing;
courses (relevant MA or BA courses);
annual/bi-annual PhD seminar organized at CA-DS
Administrative support and advice regarding project finances.

The bench fee for PhD candidates amounts to €8,500 a year for a maximum period of four years. Note that the bench fee pays for the PhD track, and therefore cannot be used to pay for research/travel/visa/conference/training costs for the PhD candidate.

The bench fee should be paid every year (for a maximum of four years). The first payment should be made before the start of the PhD programme. A refund of the bench fee—for example in the case of (early) termination of the PhD—is not possible.

For research/travel/visa/conference/training costs candidates should allocate at least €2500 per year in order to guarantee successful execution of the project.

The Leiden Graduate School of Social and Behavioural Sciences' PhD regulations, an overview of the formal procedure from start to defence, and the relevant forms and templates are available on the Graduate School website .

Employment status: Employee
PhD Track: Yes
Writing of an 8-month-paper, summarizing their results so far. Fieldwork may only start after this paper is approved.
Bench fee: No
Teaching: the PhD candidate can spend a maximum of 10% of their 3-5 year appointment on teaching or committee work (e.g. as a member of the ‘Instituutsraad’ or ‘onderzoekscommissie’). Teaching time will be officially considered teacher training. Additionally, the candidate may participate in a maximum of two ICLON teacher-training/ University Teaching Qualification (BKO) courses (paid for by the Institute). While teaching experience and training courses may contribute to a BKO portfolio, they will probably be insufficient for qualification.

Candidates following a PhD track

Employment status: Guest employee
Legal status: depends on the contract
Bench Fee: Yes Note that some contract PhDs (e.g. DIKTI) have already set bench fees based on previously determined contract/agreements with the fund provider and Leiden University. In these cases, the bench fee/tuition fee that has been agreed upon will be binding
Teaching: by mutual agreement the candidate may give one or more guest lectures in a BSc or MSc course or a research seminar, but cannot receive any compensation for this. For non-EU PhD candidates, restrictions in permits may apply. Participating in the course University Teaching Qualification (BKO) is an option, but will have to be paid for by the candidate or the fund provider.

Candidates not following a PhD track

Legal status: depends on individual arrangement, usually none
PhD Track: No
Bench Fee: No
Teaching: No

Note that the supervision for a PhD candidate who does not follow a PhD track will be significantly less intensive.

Supervision and social safety of PhDs at our Institute

Revised: December 2022

(complementing the CADS PhD Training and Supervision Protocol of March 2020, the Leiden University PhD regulations of 2021 and the Golden Rules of PhD supervision )

This document was drafted together by the CADS Institute Board, its Institute Council and representatives of the CADS PhD community, in response to concerns that were first raised among the latter. Concerned PhD students emphasized that our institute has a wide range of PhDs with different positions, in terms of funding and institutional position, but also based on their passports, the academic culture they have come to expect etc. An overall conclusion was that some of the existent measures work for some of these PhDs and not for others, and that we need a variety of measures to strengthen the position of PhDs in the Institute and increase mechanisms that ensure their social safety.

After an open and constructive conversation, regarding recurring problems experienced within the PhD trajectory, and suggestions for improvement we decided to collectively formulate the following guidelines, that again, complement the guidelines in the documents already mentioned above:

Graduate Mentor
Per September 2022 the Institute CADS has instated a Graduate Mentor (GM) who will pay special attention to the work life, progress and wellbeing of PhD students.
The graduate mentor will regularly check in with them, at least once a year, with all PhD students who are in their contract period. The role of the Graduate Mentor applies specifically to contract PhDs (both those on NWO, ERC or other funded projects, or those here with a scholarship from abroad), but also external PhDs and PhDs whose contract ended) are welcome to approach the Graduate Mentor for a talk.
The Director of Research (DirRes) keeps annually contact through email with PhD students who fall outside this regimen ( e.g., external PhD students or those beyond their contract years), asking them to provide an overview of where their project is standing but also about the challenges and hindrances they may be experiencing. This is necessary as especially the external PhD students may already be less ‘visible’ and ‘vocal’, so this contact, at least once a year, should help keep track of their safety and well-being
The GM (not the Institute manager as in other cases) is present at the Performance and Development Interview of the PhD, including the startup meeting. As soon as PhD students get an invitation for a P&D interview, they contact GM to see if she can be present during and beforehand discuss that Interview. This, to ensure that these are evaluative conversations about the past year and future plans, as well as the working relation between supervisor and supervisee, rather than another supervision meeting (see also below).
The annual GM/PhD meeting and Performance and Development Interview should be sequenced after one another. In that way the GM can be fully updated and coach the PhD for the Performance and Development Interview. In the Performance and Development Interview GM will be a neutral witness. In case the situation is difficult, the GM can advise the PhD on strategy of next steps, and e.g. help with writing a letter to IC. The GM has no position to sanction anyone, not the PhD nor the supervisor. Any attempts to intervene in the supervision and PhD trajectory should come from the IB.
the Graduate Mentor follows the PhDs, but does not monitor the PhDs (e.g. not: “your 8 th month paper is due next week”), PhDs and their supervisors are expected to take a lead here.
All PhD students can approach the GM for advice regarding their trajectory. The Graduate Mentor does not have mandate; Graduate Mentor can talk with supervisors, but the mandate lies with the Institute Board .
The graduate mentor can also advise supervisors, both during supervisor peer discussion sessions (intervisie) and on a more individual basis, to improve supervision and prevent frictions and misunderstandings of escalating into conflict or dysfunctional working relations. The (co)promotoren overleg is the best setting to put structural aspects of supervision on the agenda. For specific topics GM can chair the meeting.
The graduate mentor has an exit meeting with supervisor and PhD student . In case the official employment of a PhD Student ends before the actual thesis is finished, expectations about the continuation of supervision will be discussed during this exit meeting. A perspective of closure is key to think long-term career strategies and to keep calm and confident. If the PhD contract is ended, laptop, mobile and office keys need to be returned as they are formally property from Leiden University, not CADS. Candidate can now apply for a guest / affiliated researcher account, still make use of office space and borrow one of the CADS laptops during office hours.
Supervision team
The CADS PhD training protocol includes a requirement for each PhD to have a second supervisor . This is formally the case, but it is important to ensure that that second supervisor is factually involved, and has complementary expertise to that of the PhD. Ideally, the supervision team consists of a senior and relatively junior member of staff.
Where possible, the second supervisor is chosen in dialogue with the PhD candidate. The first month can be used to explore possibilities, before the Training and Supervision Plan (TSP or OBP in Dutch) is uploaded.
Before the start of a research project or PhD trajectory, DirRes discusses the proposed supervisory arrangements with prospective supervisor, including the composition of the supervision team, to ensure that the requirements are met, and more generally, that they can expect to have favorable working conditions and will be sufficiently integrated into the institute.
DirRes and Institute Manager (IM) help ensure comparable working conditions over the various projects, and that these conditions meet the parameters of employees in our Institute.
Startup meeting
Supervisors should ensure they are informed about the CADS and other relevant PhD training regulations (see at the top of this document). At the start of a PhD trajectory, they are expected to have a conversation with each PhD to discuss these regulations, as well as, more generally, the parameters of their working relation . This includes rights to holidays, health arrangements, agreements regarding budget and expenses, meeting in person/working remotely, working rhythms (including the prevention of systematic over-work), number of tasks and time pressure.
These agreements are part of and set down in the TSP (see chapter 2 of the PhD Regulations ), and should be revisited on a yearly basis in the annual Performance & Development Interview.
The TSP is not just a paper tiger, it is about expectation management, aims to protect the PhD students and provides a road map for supervisors to use when they are at the start of a collaboration with a PhD. Hence the TSP needs to be approved by the scientific director of the Institute.
It would be good to develop a topic list or protocol that supervisors can use for this meeting. We can draw on the existing Golden Rules for PhD Supervision document. In the Bring your thesis seminar PhDs students will regularly (also for newcomers to the community) discuss this list, and add suggestions. These suggestions will then be sent to the Director of Research who will discuss it with the Supervisors and adjust a local CADS version of the Golden Rules accordingly.
Yearly Performance & Development Interview (ROG)

The Performance & Development Interview (RO Gesprek, in Dutch, or ROG) should be a moment where PhD and supervisor can discuss both the student’s progress and work experiences, look forward to the coming year(s) and discuss their work relation. The latter is difficult in light of the hierarchical and dependency relation of that relation, which means this has to be explicitly facilitated.

In order to do so, we propose the following:

Include explicit questions about the working relation between PhD and supervisor in the yearly overview form for PhDs (such as: what do you like about the relation, what can be improved? How often do you meet, and is this a good rhythm for you? Does the type and form of feedback you receive from your supervisors work well for you? If not, what could be improved etc.). The IC has meanwhile come up with a proposal for a new format in Fall 2022.
Have the Graduate Mentor sit in on the P&D Interview , and invite PhDs to consult with them beforehand to prepare for their Performance & Development Interview. This consult is part of the annual P&D Interview.
Contract PhD’s and buitenpromovendi don’t have a yearly P&D Interview. The Graduate Mentor will, however, have a yearly meeting with the contract PhD’s. The Director of Research will similarly keep in touch with the buitenpromovendi on an yearly basis.
Supervisory skills and roles
Supervisors are required to take a course on PhD supervision; this includes courses for first-time co-promotors, and possibly refresher courses for more experienced ones.
Supervisors are invited to the regular (co)promotoren overleg is (intervisie) organized by the Director of Research, where they exchange experiences and discuss conundrums that are part of PhD supervision. This can be among PI’s of larger projects, but also can encompass all PhD supervisors, depending on the topic at hand. The graduate mentor can provide input for and be an important interlocutor in these meetings.

Important discussion topics: balance between project requirements and space for PhD’s own choices, development and insights; how best to deal with budget in transparent manner within project teams; what can supervisors/PI’s do to ensure the successful integration of new PhDs in the Institute?

Supervision should be an important aspect of the promotor’s ROG. The graduate mentor is asked for input in this regard.
Bureaucratic processes and their consequences on the PhD trajectory (e.g. with regard to visa, housing) can be a challenge. Supervisors, however, do not have a responsibility in these matters which are more efficiently handled by other bodies such as the International Office.
Oftentimes PhDs would like to integrate career discussions, incl. those that address careers outside of the institute, more into the supervisory process of the PhD trajectory. Although some supervisors may give good advice and it does not do harm to ask, these are typical issues that are best discussed during the Bring Your Thesis seminar.

In case of problems in the supervisory relation that PhD students feel they cannot discuss with their supervisors, they can:

Consult with the Graduate Mentor. The GM can provide advise on how to open up a conversation on this, or can play a mediating role with the supervisor in question.
In more complex and fraught cases, the graduate mentor can confer with the SD and/or advise the student to write an email to the SD explaining the situation. Depending on the nature of the complaints, there will be follow up advice on next steps. The SD may discuss the problem with the various people involved, in an attempt to mediate and find a solution. The advice may also entail the recommendation to consult with the confidential counselor of the Faculty/Leiden University or a referral to the official complaint procedure of Leiden University.

Research clusters play an important role in providing a safe space for learning and intellectual exchange, and ensure that PhD students have connections and a space to share their work with junior and senior staff beyond their specific project and/or supervisor. In order to ensure this works well, we propose that:

Every PhD becomes a member of a research cluster.
Cluster coordination is done by a team of one permanent faculty members and a senior PhD student.
The PhD who co-coordinates a research cluster should have the status of employee within the contract time. Other PhDs can take on a role as cluster co-coordinator too, if they want to, however the institute should not expect it from e.g., external PhDs or PhDs who are beyond their contract period.
PhD supervisors should make sure they do not reproduce that supervisory relation in the research cluster. Cluster coordinators and the graduate mentor can help ensure this.
The coordinators also ensure that new members “land” well in the cluster.
PhD community

There are several initiatives for collective and self-care within the PhD community which have already proven important with respect to social safety and PhD wellbeing, especially the first hour of the BYT seminar. The PhDs will take up the idea of PhD mentorship in which a more senior PhD mentors an incoming PhD. The PhDs are investigating the status of the ‘buddy system’ that we initiated. For starters, the PhD representative sent a message to all PhDs to send her an email if they want to be coupled to a PhD mentor. Support that would help this initiative further. When a PhD starts, it would be great if the supervisor or GM could connect the new PhD to the PhD representative who has an overview of the current PhD mentors.

This document is formal living document that twice a year will be evaluated, once at the first Bring Your Thesis seminar of the academic year, and another time in the 1 st regular (co)promotoren overleg of the academic year.

Advancing to Doctoral Candidacy

When you’re ready to advance to doctoral candidacy, consult with your department regarding policies related to your program of work and to ensure you’ve completed any steps that must be taken prior to candidacy.

Forming the Dissertation Committee

All doctoral students, in consultation with the committee supervisor(s), must secure the agreement of a minimum of four people to serve on their dissertation or treatise committee.

The supervisor and at least two other committee members must be members of your program's Graduate Studies Committee (GSC).

At least one committee member must be from outside your gsc., some departments may require that more than four individuals serve on the dissertation or treatise committee..

Retired faculty who have been nominated or granted emeritus status and who were members of the GSC upon retirement may request continued membership on the GSC with approval of the Dean of Graduate Studies. Such requests should be accompanied by the recommendation of the appropriate GSC, and be submitted to the graduate school by the GSC chair. If approved, the continued membership will be reviewed annually.

Such faculty may serve on student committees as a GSC member or as a co-supervisor, but may not serve as a sole supervisor. In the event that a GSC member of a dissertation committee terminates employment with the university, except as discussed above, an additional current GSC member must be added to the committee. A former faculty member may remain on the dissertation committee, but will assume status as an outside committee member.

CVs/Resumes for Non-GSC Committee Members

The Graduate School requires a CV/resume for committee members who are not on the program’s Graduate Studies Committee. Degree plan evaluators will search for them, but in cases where a CV/resume cannot easily be found online, it is the student’s responsibility to provide this information. One of the degree plan evaluators will contact the student should a CV/resume be required.

Applying for Candidacy

Update your contact information.

After your committee is formed, visit All My Addresses at the link above to update your name, address and phone number.

Complete the Degree Candidacy Application form

Students must have registered and paid tuition during the term in which the candidacy application is submitted.

As part of the application, you will be required to include a brief (60 lines or less) description of your dissertation or treatise proposal approved by your committee supervisor. This should be prepared in advance; the application will time out after 30 minutes of inactivity and you will lose any changes not yet submitted or saved.

Request for Change in Doctoral Committee

Changes to committee membership require special approval, so students should be certain the membership is complete and correct before initiating the application.

Petition to Write Dissertation in a Language other than English

Those who wish to write a thesis, report, dissertation or treatise in a language other than English must petition to do so.

Certifying Academic Credentials

The program of work for the Doctor of Philosophy includes the courses taken toward fulfillment of the degree requirements, as established by the Graduate Studies Committee and the Graduate School.

The program of work must:

Have a minimum of 30 semester hours of advanced coursework, including a minimum of 6 hours of dissertation;

Include only courses taken within the past six years;, include coursework that is sufficient in academic breadth/depth..

Contact your Graduate Adviser to determine the specific requirements for your degree.

Completing Registration Requirements

Continuous registration.

Once the Dean of Graduate Studies approves your application and you have been admitted to candidacy, you are required to continuously register for the dissertation course (_99W) or treatise course beginning the next long term. (Music majors and treatise option students should check with their graduate adviser for registration requirements.)

The Graduate School regularly reviews and approves candidacy applications during the first half of terms, but applications submitted after the halfway point may not be reviewed immediately or in time for pre-registration.

If you will be applying for candidacy later in the term and want to sign up for the required _99W course the following term, it is suggested you pre-register for a placeholder course of the equivalent hours until your application is reviewed and approved.

If you advance to candidacy after the 12th class day you are not required to enroll in the _99W course until the next long term, after which point you must remain continuously enrolled in dissertation hours until graduation.

If you have questions about advancing to candidacy or completing the application, contact your departmental graduate office.

RECRUITING NEW PhD Student and Postdoc for fall 2025!

August 5, 2024

In a longstanding collaboration between the Moffitt-Caspi Team and the Hariri Lab https://www.haririlab.com/home.html , we are recruiting a new PhD student and a new postdoctoral fellow for fall 2025. We seek trainees who have a specific interest in midlife brain aging , its origins in early life, and its implications for mental and physical health in later life. The research training will be grounded in the ongoing longitudinal Dunedin Study, which has followed a population-representative birth cohort for six decades , funded by the National Institute on Aging . We collected a first wave of MRI data in 875 Study members when they were 45 years old and are currently collecting a second wave of data as Dunedin Study members turn 52 years old this year . We expect the second wave of data collection to be ready for analysis by fall semester 2025 . This will lead to many opportunities to map individual life histories (e.g., childhood adversity, environmental exposures, history of mental illness) onto changes in midlife brain structure , cognitive changes, epigenetic aging measures , and risk markers for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. The research training will also afford opportunities to extend findings from the Dunedin Study through other MRI datasets and epigenetic datasets, including those collected through ADNI, UK Biobank, BrainLat, and ENIGMA. The trainee will be collectively supervised by Avshalom Caspi, Ahmad Hariri, and Temi Moffitt. Applications for the Duke PhD program may be submitted through either the Clinical Psychology training area or the Cognition & the Brain training area in the Department of Psychology & Neuroscience , as well as the Cognitive Neuroscience Admitting Program. Applications for Postdoc training can be submitted through a number of T32 Training Grant programs in the Duke Medical School. Ideal candidates will have existing research experience with MRI data analysis including a strong background in programming , or experience with epigenetics research . Contact us to discuss your application.

Terrie Moffitt
Avshalom Caspi
Former Mentees
Our Travels
Weekly Pandemic Newsletters
Progress Report and Literature Review
Our Publications
Validation of DunedinPACE in EPIC V2 Data
Links to Podcasts, Video Talks, & Other Resources
Code to Implement the Tool, DunedinPACE
Dunedin Study
Dunedin Neuroimaging Study
E-Risk Study
Empirical Studies
Theory & Methods
Polygenic Risk
Serotonin Transporter Gene Debate
MAOA, Crime, and the Courts
Crime and Punishment
Classroom Discussion
Theoretical Essays
Empirical Articles
Articles of Interest
Cannabis and the IQ
Systematic Social Observation
Study of Relative Deprivation
Statistical Code
Publications
Video Gallery
The Origins of You

Read the special English-language DEMOS on the occasion of the European Population Conference 2024 in Edinburgh

Nidi is the national demographic research institute. nidi conducts leading, high-level scientific research in the broad field of population studies thereby also contributing to solving societal challenges. the research is organized around four core themes, is characterized by an interdisciplinary approach and is internationally oriented., nidi 50 years • cross sections of population research, nidi is proud to be partner in the summit project socion receiving 30 million of funding, ggp newsletter june 2024, vacancy: senior researcher migration, latest issue of demos, our bulletin on population and society (in dutch).

Congratulations to Aart Liefbroer for winning the Dirk J. Van Der Kaa Award at #EPC2024 ! Thanks for your work and for being such an inspiration for all of us! pic.twitter.com/ecR2iouNzh — NIDI (@NIDI_KNAW) June 15, 2024

publication alert [9-7-2024]:

Kalmijn & Henkens - , in: .

publication alert [5-7-2024]:

Lössbroek & Van Tubergen - , in: .

📢 Job Alert! GGP is looking for 2 new colleagues: 🎒Junior Researcher, application deadline June 23, more info and application here: https://t.co/TMcC7hySjS 💼Senior Coordinator, application deadline July 15, more info and application here: https://t.co/UmpBeHP84h pic.twitter.com/nLZ1dhlUzO — GGP (@GGP_i) June 19, 2024

The new #demos is out - a special issue for the EPC (extra long + in English). You can read it here: https://t.co/s9XniE8i3o pic.twitter.com/bgrmbULLIj — NIDI (@NIDI_KNAW) June 4, 2024

In de nieuwe #demos lees je over digitaal nomadisme: wat kenmerkt dit en hoe groot is de interesse hierin? Verder: hoe is de mentale gezondheid aangetast tijdens covid-lockdowns? En nemen vakantietrips toe na pensionering? Link naar het volledige nummer: https://t.co/detNDVldDM pic.twitter.com/K6yJumme1m — NIDI (@NIDI_KNAW) May 3, 2024

Een artikel over het proefschrift van @LRouvroye verscheen vandaag in de Volkskrant: https://t.co/p1OeBE25Lh — NIDI (@NIDI_KNAW) April 15, 2024

With a budget of 1 million euros, the project will study the diversity in forms and causes of this loneliness. This knowledge will be translated into practical tools to reach lonely older migrants and to tackle their loneliness. 2/2 — NIDI (@NIDI_KNAW) December 6, 2023

PhD defence Joeke Kuyvenhoven

Call for papers iussp international population conference 2025, latest publications, families & generations, migration & migrants, data infrastructure & dissemination, ageing & longevity, work & retirement.

Doktora nedir? PhD Nedir? Kapsamlı Anlatım

Doktora Nedir?

Doktora ne demek, phd nedir phd ne demek.

PhD -Doctor of Philosophy (Çeşitli Alanlarda Doktora Programı) / (Sıklıkla Görebileceğiniz)
DBA- Doctor of Business Administration (İşletme Doktorası)
DEdPsy – Doctor in Educational Psychology (Eğitim Psikolojisi Doktorası)
DClinPsy – Doctor in Clinical Psychology (Klinik Psikoloji Doktorası)
DPsy – Doctor in Psychotherapy (Psikoterapi Doktorası)
EngD – Doctor in Engineering (Mühendislik Doktorası)
MD – Doctor of Medicine (Tıp Doktorası)

Doktora Başvuru Şartları Nelerdir?

Doktora yapma şartları (güncel – 2022).

Sizler için hazırladığımız Yeni Sistem ALES Puan Hesaplama Motoru ile de sınava hazırlanırken tüm eksiklerinizi görebilirsiniz.

Doktora Nasıl Yapılır?

Doktora kaç yıl sürer, bütünleşik doktora nedir, bütünleşik doktora şartları nelerdir, doktora adaylarına tavsiyeler.

E-posta adresiniz yayınlanmayacak. Gerekli alanlar * ile işaretlenmişlerdir

Daha sonraki yorumlarımda kullanılması için adım, e-posta adresim ve site adresim bu tarayıcıya kaydedilsin.

Benzer Yazılar

YÖK 100/2000 Doktora Bursu – Güncel Gelişmeler!

Post Doktora Nedir? Post Doktora Bursları 2022-2023

Doktora Yeterlilik Nedir? Doktora Yeterlilik Hazırlanma Süreci

Fulbright Doktora Sonrası Araştırma Bursu 2023-2024

Daha fazla makale.

Akademik Personel Maaşları 2024 | Zamlı Akademisyen Maaşı

Hostes Maaşları 2024 – Ne Kadar? THY Pegasus SunExpress Qatar Airways !

2023 YLSY Başvuruları Başladı! YLSY Nedir? Güncel Başvuru Şartları Neler?

Asteğmen maaşları 2024: asteğmenler ne kadar maaş alıyor.

Doktor Maaşları 2024: (ZAMLI) Doktor Maaşı Ne Kadar Oldu?

Yazılım Mühendisliği Maaşları 2024 | Zamlı Maaş Bilgileri

Emekli Öğretmen Maaşları 2024 | Yeni Ocak Zammı Birlikte

Para Kazandıran Oyunlar 2023 -Oyun Oynayarak Para Kazan

11 . 24 . 19
Build Your Network , LinkedIn

I Reviewed 53 PhD Linkedin Profiles. Here’s What I Saw

Posted by: Chris

One morning in December, I put the call out on Twitter that anyone with an advanced degree looking to build a career should join the new Roostervane group on LinkedIn.

Plus, I promised to do a LinkedIn review of anyone who joined that day.

The requests started rolling in quickly. And by the end of the day, I’d reviewed 53 profiles. It was amazing to see the caliber of people in the group. So many with fantastic skill sets and interesting backgrounds. And while so many of the profiles had so many great things, I noticed a few common places where they could be improved.

This post may contain links to affiliate products, which–if you choose to purchase–pay us a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps to support our work. We only promote products we’ve used and love.

You can read my story about leaving academia in Doctoring: Building a Life With a PhD–Available on Amazon.

1. Work from top to bottom

Go look at a few LinkedIn profiles and see what you notice. If you’re like most people, you see:

The Picture
The Headline
The “About” Section
The “Experience” Section
Anything else

Exactly in that order.

When you fill out your Master’s or PhD LinkedIn profile, the temptation is to put the most work into the “Experience” section—like a resume—to show what you’ve done.

But the thing about LinkedIn is that people open a page, start at the top, and stop reading if they get bored. Unlike a resume, they can’t glance down at your history; they have to scroll.

When people have all their career details buried in the “Experience” section, which some readers will never get to, it hurts the profile.

Since the “About” section comes first by default on LinkedIn—some people never get there.

Make sure your profile starts with a strong headline, at least a few sentences of “About” that are interesting and show some personality.

2. The Picture

So arrange your priorities based on the list we just wrote.

What’s the first thing people notice? Before they even click on the link that takes them to your site?

The picture!

This is so important. The picture should be clear and close up. It needs to be close enough that people can look into your eyes and trust you. And if you’re smiling it goes a long way!

Professional headshots are great. But if you don’t have that, wash your face, do your hair, put on something clean and professional, and stand against a wall outside and smile directly into your phone’s camera-selfie lens. You’ll get something that looks good. (I know it’s awkward. I’ve done it too. Push through it.)

Allow me to demonstrate.

This picture is me.

This picture is also me.

Crooked tie, I know. But still, it’s obvious which one is best.

The thing that’s vital… and I mean vital… to understand, is that a connection request from the first picture will get ignored. The second might get some traction.

3. Make your headline shine

If employers or recruiters search for a role they need to fill on LinkedIn, your name will only come up if you have some of the keywords they’ve searched for. Then, they see your name on a tiny little list of people that pop up.

Try it yourself.

Search for a job title in the LinkedIn search bar and notice what you see. Which profiles stand out to you?

If you’re trying to get a non-academic job in a specific field, it’s important to add a field-specific word to your headline. “Researcher” doesn’t mean much, so it’s way better to have “AI Researcher” or “Historical Researcher.” I’d identify a field here with ONE ADJECTIVE ONLY. Keep it tight.

Also, if you’re looking a PhD for a non-academic job, I’d recommend having “PhD Candidate” or “PhD Student” as part of your headline—BUT ADD MORE THAN THIS! This is a bad PhD LinkedIn.

Fill it out a bit with a few extra descriptives.

If you are changing fields or are in a field that’s less relevant to non-academic work, try adding an aspirational title to your headline that identifies a specific value you bring to the job market.

For example, you might be a “Project Manager,” “Data Analyst,” or an “Editor.”

So all together, this could look like: “AI Researcher | Data Analyst | PhD Candidate” or “Historical Researcher | Research Project Manager | PhD Student.”

I format mine like this—with the tiny little bars—but you don’t have to. Have a look around LinkedIn at different ways to do it.

4. Be careful with academic jargon

This advice depends. If you’re looking for altac work splicing genoisotopic hormones of CHN—and there’s an industry for that—totally leave it in. (I just made that up, so don’t google it.)

But if you’re looking to make yourself hireable to a wider variety of employers, I’d keep it simple. “I do gene splicing,” or “I’m a conservation archeologist.”

And for humanities students in obscure fields (like my ancient history degree was), I wouldn’t talk too much about your research. Focus more on general value propositions you bring. So “my research is on ancient Egyptian sacrificial urns” might become “I’m a historian studying how people build meaning into their lives…” or something like that.

5. Let’s talk “About”

The “About” section is important. As I said above, it’s the thing people often see first, and sometimes the only thing they see.

I love an “About” section that’s engaging and shows some personality.

Remember, a lot of employers see academics as being out of touch and having their heads in the clouds.

There’s no better way to contradict this than with an engaging career story that shows that you’re more than just a pretty brain. ( I also wrote this post about assumptions employers make about PhDs and how to counteract them .)

Use first person.

Tell your career story with limited jargon.

Don’t just talk about your research field. Talk about the skills you bring to the workplace that employers want.

And don’t be afraid to say where you want your career to go.

6. Lead with your thoughts

If you’re on the non-academic job market or you will be soon, it can be great to engage in some thought leadership on LinkedIn. Start sharing links of posts in your field. Comment (kindly and intelligently) on things others have written or shared. And write your own material on LinkedIn or a blog and share it!

It’s a great way to get eyes on you and your profile and to establish yourself as an emerging voice. ( I wrote this post about the value of thought leadership ).

A few final thoughts about your PhD LinkedIn…

There are different seasons of a PhD LinkedIn. I’m not job-searching anymore. I’m an entrepreneur. And so, I don’t need potential employers to be impressed by my LinkedIn.

However, I do use LinkedIn for thought leadership! So I use my LinkedIn differently. And opportunities now come to me from my network.

LinkedIn was a great tool in building this network in the first place. And a LinkedIn reach-out literally got me my first job. So the possibilities are endless!

Finally, there’s no one way to do LinkedIn. If you search for advice on how to do it, you’ll find different things. People have different opinions on what works, and it changes regularly.

But if you focus on 1. Who you are, 2. What your skills are, and 3. How they can solve a problem for an employer —You’ll be fine.

Hey! If you’re in the process of building a career with a PhD, check out my book about leaving academia– Doctoring: Building a Life After a PhD — now available on Amazo n.

Psst… Did you know Roostervane has a YouTube channel? Here’s a video I made with some quick networking tips. Don’t forget to subscribe!

Consulting Secrets 3 – Landing Clients

Photo by Christian Sterk on Unsplash There’s a new type of post buzzing around LinkedIn. I confess, I’ve even made a few. The post is

You’re Not Good Enough… Yet

Last year, I spent $7k on a business coach. She was fantastic. She helped me through sessions of crafting my ideas to become a “thought

$200/hr Expert? Here’s the Secret!

Photo by David Monje on Unsplash I was listening to Tony Robbins this week. He was talking about being the best. Tony asks the audience,

EMAIL UPDATES

Weekly articles, tips, and career advice

Roostervane exists to help you launch a career, find your purpose, and grow your influence

Write for Us

The misuse of PhD(c)

Why a designation used by some students is seen as unethical

By Amy Novotney

September 2016, Vol 47, No. 8

Print version: page 36

Degrees and Programs

A few months ago when University of Louisville counseling psychology professor Mark Leach, PhD, read an email from a psychology student on a listserv he belonged to, he noticed that the sender had put "PhD(c)" after her name. He reached out to her right away.

"I contacted her because the "c" stands for candidate, but is not officially recognized and has the potential to mislead the public," Leach recalls.

The PhD(c)—also sometimes written as PhD-c or PhDc—has been popping up more often over the last several years in curricula vitae and email signatures. The designation is meant to indicate that the person has completed all of his or her requirements for a PhD except for the dissertation—akin to "ABD" (all but dissertation) that many also use.

Students say the term's use has become common among their colleagues, leading others to think that it is an appropriate way to highlight one's career path. But many psychologists say it's important to understand how these designations might be perceived outside of their use in casual conversations between psychologist friends and colleagues.

"Within academic circles we understand it, but my concern is that as soon as you send something out in an email, it can go anywhere in the world," Leach says, including into the hands of nonpsychologists and nonacademics.

The concern is that this designation comes off as deceptive and has the potential to mislead others regarding training and experience and undermine the public's trust in psychologists, says Lindsay Childress-Beatty, JD, PhD, of APA's Ethics Office. In fact, APA Ethics Code section 5.01—Avoidance of False or Deceptive Statements—specifically addresses the issue of designations, stating that "Psychologists do not make false, deceptive, or fraudulent statements concerning (1) their training, experience, or competence; (2) their academic degrees; (3) their credentials..."

"Would the general public be able to make the distinction between someone in training using these designations and a psychologist who has completed the degree?" she asks. Probably not. Many consumers don't understand the psychology field and the training and credentials necessary to become a psychologist. "The responsibility falls on psychologists and psychology students to educate them by accurately portraying their degrees and qualifications," Childress-Beatty says.

Using PhD(c) and ABD is also a bad idea because these letters can be confused for other degrees, points out Nabil El-Ghoroury, PhD, of the American Psychological Association of Graduate Students. For example, ABD could easily be mistaken for a doctorate of business administration, he says.

Rather than using PhD(c) and ABD next to one's name, he recommends that students use "advanced graduate student" to describe themselves and include a sentence in their cover letters that explains they have completed all their coursework but are still writing their dissertations.

"That's what a cover letter is for," he says. "But when it comes to your resume, email signature or even an online application, only list the degrees you've earned because we all have a responsibility to be ethical and to protect the public."

Letters to the Editor

Send us a letter

[email protected]
+27731232637

Our Purpose
History of MWAPSS – Founders
Research & Projects
Publications
Photo Gallery
Dynamic Page 1
Dynamic Page 2

Malawi Association of Political Science Students (MWAPSS)

The Confluence for all political science students and early-career researchers in Malawi MWAPSS is a consortium of students, early-career researchers, and emerging industry professionals with backgrounds in political science and its allied fields.

Read More...

Conferences

MWAPSS hosts the bi-annual conference to bring together early-career academics and students in the field who are producing cutting-edge research on politics in Malawi, Africa, and the rest of the world.

Our Objectives

We have some special crieteria that will help you, promote better understanding.

MWAPSA wants promote a better understanding of political science and its related fields.

PROMOTE INTERCHANGE

Promote interchange among all Malawian political science students through short courses, workshops, discussion, conferences, and publications.

REPRESNT UNDERGRADUATE

To represent the undergraduate political science students before other departmental groups.

Know Our Founders

Lloyd george banda, raphael ned, joseph mezuwa chirwa, chikondi chizinja, rodwell katundu, jayne asantesana kanyangale, our publications, we are young innovative social scientists with more publications to come, training workshop.

Qualitative Data Analysis with Chikondi Chidzanja (PhD Candidate)

All our skilled team members are listed below

IAPSS Country Coordinator | Malawi

President and Representative, University of Malawi

Are you interested to know more?

Do you want to be receiving our daily updates, then email us now.

phd candidate nedi

IMAGES

VIDEO

COMMENTS

PhD Nedir? Doktora Derecesi Nasıl Alınır?

PhD’nin tarihi ile başlayalım

PHD nasıl yapılır?

PHD başvuru şartları nelerdir?

Phd candidate ne demek

PHD araştırma süreçleri nelerdir?

Türkiye’de kaç kişi PHD yapıyor?

PHD'nin önemi nedir?

Doktora en erken kaç yılda biter?

Bütünleşik doktora kaç yıl sürer?

PhD’nin açılımı nedir?

PhD kaç yıl sürer?

PhD ünvanı nasıl kullanılır?

YKS Sıralamaları

What is the Difference Between a PhD Candidate and a PhD Student?

Introduction

Who is a PhD Candidate?

Upcoming Events

Recent Posts

Research Assistant/PhD candidate in Environmental Process Technology

Where to apply

Additional Information

Work Location(s)

PhD Candidate vs Student: What’s the Difference?

What I s a PhD student?

What Is a PhD Candidate?

PhD Candidate vs Student: 6 Key Differences

1. Program Stage

2. Research Progress

3. Relationship with Advisors

4. Level of Support

5. Flexibility and Structure

Tips for PhD Candidates

Stay Organized

Focus on Your Research

Actively Seek Out Feedback

Take Advantage of Networking Opportunities

Take Care of Yourself

How Long Is a Typical PhD Candidacy?

Benefits of Being a PhD Candidate

1. Research Opportunities

2. Networking

3. Critical Thinking

4. Career Opportunitie s

5. Salaries

6. Personal Fulfillment

Qualifying Exams to Become a PhD Candidate

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I Put ‘PhD Candidate’ after My Name?

How Long Can You Be a PhD Candidate?

Do PhD Students Take Classes?

Key Takeaways

Lisa Marlin

14 Cheap Spring Break Destinations for College Students in 2024

Computer Science Graduate Admission Trends: Annual Results

The Best Academic Planners for 2024/2025

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Recent Posts

News & Events

About the 2024 Alumni of Influence recipients

Gordon Beach (BSc’74)

Tenille Campbell (BA’07)

Aaron Genest (BSc’07, PhD’13)

Pat Atkinson (BA’73, BEd’77)

Related Articles

Alumni Book Nook: Dr. Matthew R. Anderson (BA’81)

Pursuing his passions on the stage and in the classroom

AIRING: 3rd Annual MFA Group Exhibition

Couzyn van Heuvelen: CAMP

MFA Exhibition: Demilade Otayemi

What is a PhD?

PhD vs Doctorate

What Are the Entry Requirements for a PhD?

How Long Does a PhD Take?

How Much Does a PhD Cost?

What Does a PhD Involve?

Stage 1: Literature Review

Stage 2: Research

Stage 3: Write up of Thesis

Stage 4: Attending the Viva